Friday, December 31, 2021

Munich Police Stop Public Rosary

Edit: I'll bet they wouldn't dare try to impede Mohamedans or Jews. (Or Antifa!)

About 200 participants had to finish the public prayer and also blow out their candles.

 Munich ( The Munich police interrupted a rosary prayer in downtown Munich on Wednesday evening with around 200 participants.  This was reported by a participant in the demonstration in a Telegram group.  The participants had to end the peaceful prayer and also extinguish the candles [Oy veh, a fire hazard!]  The police had previously announced on Twitter that meetings, gatherings and elevators that were not displayed in the urban area and related to the measures to protect against infection were prohibited.  "The offense constitutes an administrative offense," wrote the police.  According to media reports, the police had threatened people with massive fines if they took part in unauthorized meetings, the talk is of fines of up to 3,000 euros.


Jews Mad About Dolfuß Admiring Austrian Leader

 Edit: don’t apologize, it makes you look weak. Don’t be like Holy Steve! Of course the journalist doesn’t like Dolfuß, the saintly Austrian steward of the kingdom on the Danube. Karner has cravenly offered to “rework” the museum featuring Dolfuß to satisfy his Jewish masters.

Finally, was anything the Austrian craven said about Israel and the United States poisoning the environment substantially wrong?

Pfizer’s Jewish developer, whose family were Sephardic Jews from Thessaloniki, Greece, is helping his evil company make billions on the deadly klot shot, which is killing many and sickening many others. What a cohencidence!

BERLIN (AP) — A Nobel laureate in literature, Jewish students and other prominent figures in Austria want the country’s new interior minister removed from office because of allegedly antisemitic comments he made during a regional election campaign more than a decade ago. 

Gerhard Karner, who became interior minister a week ago when predecessor Karl Nehammer became Austria’s new chancellor, said Monday that he regrets what he said and wouldn’t say it now, but he rejected allegations of antisemitism. 

According to a report in German news weekly Der Spiegel, the conservative Karner once accused Austria’s center-left Social Democrats of working “against the country with gentlemen from America and Israel,” and described them as “climate poisoners.”


Tuesday, December 28, 2021

The Blood of the Faithful is Europe’s New Hope

The blood of the faithful is the hope for a new Europe.

From Arduinus Rex *

"Blessed are you when you are insulted and persecuted and slandered in all possible ways for my sake" (Mt 5:11).

In the difficult days of the recent history of the Archdiocese of Paris, when Archbishop Michel Aupetit renounced the office of diocesan bishop, the Holy See decided on November 25th to recognize the martyrdom in odium fidei of five priests during the time of the so-called Paris Commune.

The uprising, which raged from March 18 to May 28, 1871 in the French capital and became known as “La Commune de Paris”, wanted to implement a form of government and a social program that was independent of the French Republic and that was based on rationalism and  libertarian socialism.  The Communards were obsessed with the idea that the Catholic religion must be suppressed in order to overthrow the old regime and establish a new form of society.  They immediately unleashed violence and persecution against the Church, ransacked many places of worship and imprisoned hundreds of clergy and religious.  When the regular French army besieged Paris on May 21st, the Communards committed atrocities known as “Semaine sanglante” or “Bloody Week”.  In those days the leaders of the insurrection carried out their plan to execute those whom they considered to be opponents.  Among the victims who died out of love for Christ and His Church were a priest of the Institute of Religieux de Saint Vincent de Paul (Religious of Saint Vincent de Paul), Henri Planchat, and four priests of the Congregation of the Sacred Hearts of Jesus  and Mary and the Eternal Adoration of the Most Holy Sacrament of the Altar (Arnstein Fathers).  They were killed on May 26, 1871, with gunfire and edged weapons.

 P. Henri Planchat

Mathieu Henri Planchat was born on November 8, 1823 in La Roche-sur-Yon in the Vendée and spent a truly pious childhood and youth, first in his hometown, then in Chartres and Lille, where his father, a judge, was transferred.  In 1837 the boy was accepted as a boarding school student at the Collège Stanislas in Paris.  He stayed there for three years and then continued his studies at the Collège de l’Immaculée-Conception of Abbé Ferdinand-Marie Poiloup in Vaugirard (then a suburb of Paris).  The years he spent in Vaugirard were decisive for the further course of his life.  He got to know the Vincent Conferences, was convinced of their idea and turned to them with great enthusiasm.  In his free time he devoted himself to the poor in the neighborhood.  He looked after the people's library set up by the parish conference, looked after the children in the schools, and spent Sundays in the patronage that the brothers of St. Vincent de Paul (today: Religious of St. Vincent de Paul) recently opened on Rue du Regard  and took care of the apprentices.  And every Sunday the young man ended the day in prayer at the feet of Our Lady of Victory.

Planchat had a bright future ahead of him, assured by his father's reputation, wealth, family connections, exceptional intelligence and brilliant law degree.  In his soul, however, the vocation as a priest grew and the desire to place himself entirely at the service of the simplest people in the institute of the brothers of St. Vincent de Paul, whom he had met in Vaugirard.  Once qualified as a lawyer, he entered the Issy seminary.  The young seminarian made no secret of the fact that he was interested in the apostolate in the lower classes.  To some of his companions it seemed impossible that a young man with the path to a brilliant ecclesiastical career open to him could dream of such a humble ideal.  Still less did they understand how he could be satisfied with a completely unadorned cell and a very modest outward appearance.  But Henri gave them an answer that betrayed the spirit with which he prepared himself for the priesthood: “Ce n'est pas à ceux qui ont de belles pendules et de beaux tapis dans leurs appartements que l'on va se confesser, quand  on veut se convertir ".  (You don't go to confession because you have beautiful clocks and luxurious carpets in your apartment, but when you want to convert).

Ordained a priest on December 21, 1850, he introduced himself three days later to Jean-Léon Le Prevost, former official of the ministry of culture and President of the Saint-Sulpice parish, superior of the small community of the Brothers of Saint Vincent de Paul.  which he founded together with Clément Myionnet, Maurice Maignen and Louis Paillé.  He was the first priest to be accepted into the young congregation.  From then on, his whole life was to be a constant act of sacrifice, terrible and magnificent at the same time, for those people whom he loved so much and from whom his executioners would also emerge.

And so he walked day and night through the streets of Grenelle, a suburb of Paris, where an indifferent, religiously self-forgotten and sometimes a working-class population lived that was hostile to Christ and Church.  The “soul hunter”, with his pockets full of medals, pictures and good books, set out to discover this world.  He penetrated every alley, went into the most disreputable corners, entered the dirtiest huts and the most polluted slums.  He also did not shrink from insults and threats.  On the contrary, they were sometimes an opportunity to have a conversation that ended in confession.  In a short time everyone got used to the fact that this priest tirelessly walked the streets of the neighborhood and entered every house.  Something changed.  Soon everyone began to come to him to confide in him their worries and needs, without being afraid to open their hearts laden with misery and suffering.  He went to everyone and brought them the comfort and help they had hoped for.  From the first months the results were admirable: high-profile conversions, people returning to the Christian faith, conversions in the face of death, legalization of civil marriage through sacramental marriages (up to five hundred per year).  Such an intense apostolate could not prevent Planchat from deteriorating in health.  After a year he got sick and had excruciating nerve pain.  A stay of several months in Italy enabled him to regain the strength to continue his service.  In April 1853 he returned to Grenelle, recovered.  He resumed his apostolate with renewed zeal.

On one of his apostolic trips he happened upon a laundry.  The sight of the priest, and a priest so poor-looking at that, shocked the workers, who treated him with sarcasm.  Without getting excited, Planchat entered the premises, handed out medals, pictures and rosaries to everyone and gave a little speech that shook all those present deeply.  When he was about to leave, the lady of the house joined him and with tears in her eyes asked him to accept a gift for a Mass for their concerns and those of the workers.

One evening he went to the house of a dying man who was far from God.  Despite his best efforts, he could not bring the sick man closer to the Savior.  Rather, he was chased away with insults and threats.  But the good priest did not want to abandon this soul.  He went down into the street, saw a curb not far away and, in spite of the icy wind that was blowing relentlessly, sat on it and began to say the rosary.  The hours passed and Planchat continued to pray the rosary.  At midnight he was still there praying for the poor dying man.  A woman ran out of the house and begged him to go up to the sick man at once.  The priest came in time to take his confession, give him the final unction and take his last breath

It was winter and Father Planchat had gone to the end of the Issy Plains to help a dying woman.  It was snowing, it was after midnight, and he had not come home yet.  His confreres were already restless.  Finally Planchat appeared covered with snow and half frozen to death.  He wasn't alone.  He had picked up a soldier who had lost his way on the plain and a homeless man in the street.

On another winter night the porter Planchat was surprised how he tried to enter the house unnoticed.  He walked at a pace that was not his usual.  When the porter asked: “What are you wearing on your feet, Reverend?” He replied: “Nothing, nothing” and tried to make himself smaller.  But the attentive porter looked at him more closely and was amazed.  Planchat was without shoes.  His socks were wet and icy.  He apologized.

“I gave it to a poor man on the Esplanade des Invalides who had none.  What can I say?  He was older than me. "

Many other anecdotes could be told about him, examples of heroic charity.  Just think of how at the outbreak of war he organized a wonderful service of spiritual and material help for the soldiers and how he went with the Abbé de Broglie on the battlefield to bring the fighters the facilities of the sacraments and spiritual service.  In order to get an idea of ​​his apostolic work, it should be remembered that in the Patronage of Saint-Anne alone, from July to December 1870, in addition to his usual apostolate among the young and poor in the area, he received four thousand soldiers, confessed and received them  gave them Communion.  In the following February it would be eight thousand!

Ladislas Radigue was born on May 8, 1823 in Saint-Patrice-du-Désert, took the habit of the Congregation of the Sacred Hearts and made perpetual vows on March 7, 1845.  He was ordained a priest on April 22, 1848.  For twenty years he was novice master, then vicar general of the congregation and finally superior of the motherhouse in the Paris district of Picpus.

Polycarpe Tuffier was born on March 14, 1807 in Le Malzieu.  During his youth he studied at the College of the Congregation of the Sacred Hearts, where he received his calling.  On May 14, 1823, he resigned from his religious profession.  He was ordained a priest in 1830 and worked as a pastor, chaplain of the sisters of the order and in various cities as superior of the respective college.  Eventually he became procurator and general councilor of the congregation.  He was distinguished by the depth of his sermons.

Marcellin Rouchouze was born on December 14, 1810 in Saint-Julien-en-Jarez.  He placed his religious vows on February 2, 1837 in the hands of the Servant of God Marie Joseph Coudrin, founder of the Congregation of Sacred Hearts.  He was sent to Belgian colleges of the Congregation as a teacher of Latin, mathematics and philosophy.  Although he considered himself unworthy of the priesthood out of modesty, he was ordained a priest on June 5, 1852, at the age of 42, for the good of souls.  A man of calm character and pure heart, he was called to Paris as General Secretary of the Congregation.

Frézal Tardieu was born in Chasseradès on November 18, 1814 and professed on April 6, 1839 in the Congregation of the Sacred Hearts.  He was ordained a priest in 1840.  After being master of novices in Vaugirard, Leuven, Belgium, and Issy, he moved to Paris as General Councilor of the Congregation, where he continued to teach dogmatic theology.  Gifted with an excellent intellect, he repeatedly showed extraordinary charity.

Martyrdom was recognized by five victims in odium fidei of the Paris Commune.

Father Planchat was arrested on April 6, 1871, Maundy Thursday.  On April 12 of the same year, a Wednesday in the octave of Easter, the Communards broke into the motherhouse of the Congregation of the Sacred Heart, stole the precious cult objects, desecrated the Most Holy Sarament of the altar and chained the other four servants of God.  All five remained in solitary confinement in Mazas Prison for forty days and were then transferred with many other priests to the prison for convicted prisoners in La Grande Roquette.  On May 26th, they were taken from prison by the mob and soldiers who were inspired by the odium fidei, and the massacre began in a villa on Rue Haxo.  The priests were killed and their corpses desecrated.

Before they were arrested, the religious priests were aware of the danger.  Although they could have escaped, they stayed in Paris to carry out their priestly duties.  Planchat, who had been warned of his probable imprisonment, also stayed at his post to take confession from the faithful in anticipation of Easter.  As far as possible, they also made confession while they were in captivity and gave absolution.  They even managed to receive Holy Communion, which pious women secretly brought them.

Their fame as a martyrs spread immediately after they were murdered and has persisted over the years to this day.  For this reason, the beatification or the recognition of their martyrdom was initiated.  A first informative process took place from March 8, 1897 to August 8, 1900 at the ecclesiastical curia in Paris.  The diocesan inquiry took place from October 29, 2015 to May 4, 2016. On October 27, 2016, the Congregation for the Causes of Saints issued the decree on the validity of the process.  After the elaboration, the position was presented to the historians among the consultors for assessment on October 20, 2020.  It was then discussed in accordance with the usual canonical procedure whether the servants of God were really martyrs.  On May 11, 2021, the theologians among the consultors gave their approval.  The cardinals and bishops of the Congregation, who met for an ordinary session on October 19th, recognized that the servants of God had been slain for their faithfulness to Christ and the Church.

Cardinal Prefect Marcello Semeraro reported the result of these steps to Pope Francis.  The Pope accepted the vote of the Congregation for the Causes of Saints and ordered that the decree be published and included in the official pronouncements of the Congregation and thus become legally valid.

 * Arduinus Rex, a pseudonym after King Arduin of Italy, a nephew of Berengar II, related to the Franconian Unruochingers and Widonen, writes for the traditional online publication Europa Cristiana, founded and directed by the lawyer Carlo Manetti and the historian Cristina Siccardi.

 Translation: Giuseppe Nardi

 Image: Europa Cristiana

Trans: Tancred


Petty Effeminate Prelate of Chicago Has New Restrictions on Immemorial Mass of All Ages

Anyone should have guessed that the venomous gays who run the Church in the world would attempt to tear down what was beginning to be rebuilt. These restrictions are so petty as it would almost be hard to believe were it not for general familiarity with the modern princes of the Church.

May God rebuke them we humbly pray!

Since Traditionis Custodes things have been going on in quick succession.  More and more radical measures are being taken against tradition - each with the approval of Pope Francis.  This was followed by Cardinal Blase Cupich, the "man of the Pope" in the USA with his guidelines.

(Washington) Cardinal Blase Cupich, Archbishop of Chicago and spokesman for the Bergoglian minority in the USA, published yesterday his implementation of the anti-tradition Motu proprio Traditionis Custodes.  It is far more radical than that for the Diocese of Rome - with the approval of Pope Francis.

As Archbishop of Chicago, the Chief Shepherd, appointed by Francis and created as a cardinal, presides over one of the three most important dioceses of the universal Church, alongside Milan and Cologne.  As the “man of the Pope” he last proved at the autumn plenary meeting of the US Bishops' Conference that, although he is only a representative of a minority, he is the real strong man in the Church of the USA.

When Pope Francis issued his Motu proprio Traditionis Custodes  on July 16, with which he wanted to eliminate the traditional Rite and the representatives of tradition, Cardinal Cupich spoke up just five days later.  His reaction was eagerly awaited, and it was surprisingly cautious.  He announced in a statement that he wanted to “study” the motu proprio and “think about” it.  He will “consult with others” and “offer a way in due course”.  The key phrase was:

 "Meanwhile, current practice regarding the 1962 Missal remains."

This gave the all-clear, if only for the time being.  A decision that was pointed out to be a role model for progressive bishops.

From the Christmas slaughter to the Christmas stab in the back

Shortly before Christmas Eve, on behalf of Pope Francis, the Roman Congregation for Worship published more precise details on the motu proprio in the form of Responsa ad dubia, which became a Christmas slaughter against tradition.

Yesterday, sooner than expected, the final guidelines for the implementation of Traditionis custodes in the Archdiocese of Chicago followed.  The two leading US progressive media, National Catholic Reporter and America, the magazine of the Jesuits in the US, and VaticanNews, the news portal of the Holy See, announced it at the same time.  VaticanNews published a report on the Chicago Guidelines in English and Italian at the same time.  In the progressive Church circles in the USA and Rome they knew in advance and prepared the publication together.  It follows that Cardinal Cupich, the Jesuits, and Santa Marta all attach particular importance to the guidelines for Chicago.

Cardinal Cupich published an article on Traditionis Custodes in the National Catholic Reporter and America Magazine on November 10th.  Neither VaticanNews nor the press office of his archdiocese or the social media channels directly affecting him took notice of it at the time.  On the same day, the guidelines for the implementation of the motu proprio in the diocese of Rome were published with radical restrictions on tradition.  This coincidence of events also suggests coordination.

In his essay, Cardinal Cupich declared Traditionis Custodes with the “need” that Pope Francis saw “to secure the legacy of the Second Vatican Council”.

Not only the aforementioned synchronous publication is remarkable, but also the non-publication of the new measures by the Archdiocese of Chicago itself. No media channel of the Archdiocese reported on it.  Wouldn't it require at least a minimum of tact and decency for the believers concerned to be informed first and directly?

 Every fourth Sunday and public holiday canceled

This indicative form of publication means that the Chicago Santa Marta Guidelines are viewed as the desired model for the US dioceses.  The USA plays a central role in Pope Francis' thinking, both in terms of the world church and world politics.  The USA is home to a large and, above all, lively part of the traditional world, as the Save the Latin Mass initiative, against which Traditionis Custodes is directed, shows.

The simultaneous publication signals that Rome has given the Cupich measures the placet.  This not only gave the willing bishops the opportunity to “cling to” them, but Santa Marta also set a standard against which the behavior of the US bishops can be “checked”.

While Cupich ensured relaxation on July 21, by leaving everything as it was for the time being, he now struck with full force.  The Archdiocese of Chicago Policy for Implementing Traditionis Custodes restrictions it issued apply from January 25, 2022.

They are so restrictive that at the same time even celebrations ad orientem are forbidden in the Novus Ordo.  All celebrations in the new rite must be made versus populum in the future.

In its radicalism, Chicago goes beyond the implementation in the Diocese of Rome.  Cardinal Cupich forbids the celebration of the traditional rite on the first Sunday of the month.  Traditionis Custodes turns the Church year in the Vetus Ordo into holey Swiss cheese.  The decree for the Diocese of Rome “only” provides a gap for the Triduum Paschale from Maundy Thursday to Easter Sunday, in which priests and believers of tradition are to be forced to participate or concelebrate the Novus Ordo in order to demonstrate their loyalty and unity to Peter and the universal Church.

Cardinal Cupich adds a whole series of other gaps, just with the ban on celebrations on the first Sunday of each month, there are twelve.  But that's not all: even at Christmas and Pentecost, Holy Mass is no longer allowed to be celebrated in the traditional Rite.

According to this model, 18 Sundays and public holidays were declared taboo for the traditional Rite.  Depending on the area, this corresponds to more than a quarter, in some countries almost a third of all public holidays.  With Christmas, Easter and Pentecost, the heart pieces are torn out of it.

 The new year will present tradition with great challenges.

 Text: Giuseppe Nardi

 Image: Archdiocese of Chicago / / Save the Latin Mass (screenshots)

Trans: Tancred


Dreher Supports Fake Conservative Jew Candidate in French Elections — Is Shea a She?

Edit: I always love to read TP. One thing he missed, however, is that the soy filled Dreher is supporting the Jewish spoiler candidate who is running against Le Pen just like that black fraud Alan Keyes who ran against Pat Buchanan in 1992 when he looked poised to run George Bush out of D.C..

Some conservacucks are cuckier than others and I think Skojec has Dreher beat in terms of low-t.

Speaking of Low-t. Mark Shea’s net worth is allegedly at 1-5 million. Is that true that the fake conservative Shea who has for a long time  openly campaigned for leftist agendas and political causes, has made so much money tap dancing for Catholic pewsitters?  And the wiki article uses the pronoun “she” to describe Shea. We always knew Shea ate a lot of soy, but is SHE transitioning?

 By Tom Piatak

[American Remnant] Rod Dreher is singing the praises of Eric Zemmour’s announcement of his candidacy to be president of France. Understandably so. It is a powerful, moving speech. It is so powerful, in fact, thatYouTube has “age restricted” it. We can’t have the kids listening to Zemmour without a warning!

In any case, Dreher also composed his own version and asked readers to imagine the impact that would have here. It is a good speech; Dreher is a talented writer. Dreher also likens Zemmour, as others have, to Tucker Carlson. Well enough.


Sunday, December 26, 2021

Bergoglio Christmas Present: Get Third Jab or You’re Fired!

Pope Francis had Corona apartheid tightened in the Vatican.  If you don't let yourself be injected a third time, you'll be kicked out.

 (Rome) Shortly before Christmas, the Vatican State Secretariat tightened vaccination apartheid.  If the employees of the Holy See do not get themselves “vaccinated” a third time within January 31, 2022, they face the risk of dismissal.

Citing the decree he issued on September 28, Cardinal State Secretary Pietro Parolin had a new Corona decree published yesterday in the Osservatore Romano on behalf of Pope Francis.  With the September decree, the new apartheid regime had been established at the Roman Curia, which had been introduced shortly before in the Vatican State.  Since October 1st, only those who have a so-called EU Green Pass can enter the Papal States, which corresponds to the 3G regulation in the Federal Republic of Germany, the 2.5G regulation in Austria and the certificate regulation in Switzerland.  According to this regulation, healthy people - at any point in time since the outbreak of the pseudopandemic have been at least 99.5 percent of all people - no longer exist, which already says everything about their meaningfulness.

Those who do not have a Green Pass are only allowed to enter St. Peter's Basilica and there only for the four Masses that are celebrated in the morning between 7:30 and 9:30 a.m.  The stay is limited to this period.  As soon as the Mass is over, the Green Pass tickets will be invalid.

According to official information, however, the epidemiological curve north of the Alps has been falling for a month, and rapidly.  It has dropped to an eighth of the November high.  South of the Alps this takes place somewhat more slowly, but the extent is known from other countries and does not pose a risk of overloading the health system. Nevertheless, the corona measures are tightened by the governments and are constantly reaching new, unfamiliar and, above  all, negative climaxes in their language.

The Coronavirus policy of the government was carried out without facts at any point in time, but this was not so clearly recognizable for the citizens in 2020. It is now quite obviously happening.  The Holy See also joins the tightening regardless of real developments.  This particularly affects the staff and employees of the Holy See.  Anyone who does not get “vaccinated” a third time by January 31, 2022 is considered to be “unvaccinated”.  That means constant worries about the workplace.  Anyone who refuses will be banned from entering.  As at the beginning of 2021, the Vatican is threatening its employees with a worthless suspension and dismissal without notice.

 The “redeeming vaccination” brought nothing but dangers

 All those who believed that the “redeeming vaccination” (Bill Gates: “Only vaccination can save us”) would put an end to the Corona theater were already mistaken a year ago.  A “vaccination” with a genetically modified Covid preparation became two syringes.  Now there are already three.  And there is no end in sight.  The EU has reduced the “validity” of the gene serums to nine months.  Further reductions are already in the room.  The next identical decree of the Cardinal Secretary of State for the fourth “vaccination” has already been announced.  And every new step that belies all announcements and promises is made under massive pressure: The threat of losing one's job meets all the criteria of coercion, especially in view of the fact that the Covid syringe can have dangerous side effects and consequential effects.  But Pope Francis, the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith and the Corona Commission of the Vatican are silent on the morality of this highly dubious approach.  Rather, through their pioneering role, they provide other governments with a “moral” justification for their dubious actions.

The failure of the ecclesiastical hierarchy and, in its wake, moral theology meanwhile cries out to heaven.  It reflects in a significant way that Covid-19 is not the threatening killer virus, but is being misused for completely different interests.  SARS-CoV-2 was never a pandemic, which is why there is talk of a "planemia" to show that someone is directing in the background.  But the Corona Theater is even more a pandemic of the corrupt, because there are gigantic profiteers, large and small Corona winners and, above all, the criminal silence of many who would know better.

The Holy See was even the first state to introduce compulsory vaccination and vaccination apartheid.  Pope Francis has been setting a bad example for 22 months, which is why he is rightly criticized in that he plays a leading role in the Corona theater.  It was also he who disguised “vaccination” as a “moral duty” and called it an “act of love”.

A vaccination that is not one, that nobody needs, that does not work, but is dangerous, should be an “act of love” and a “moral duty”?  In the meantime, even those who have been vaccinated are laughing at the supposedly “dangerous” Omicron variant.  More and more people are beginning to see through that since December 2020 the same choreography has been repeated for the umpteenth time.  Whenever the facts create a relaxed mood in the population, a "new variant" of the virus emerges, with which governments and accomplices are stirring up panic.

Cruel mercy

The Vatican, which has a pioneering role in the governments' corona delusion measures, will only allow access to the Vatican State from February 1 to employees who have been vaccinated three times.  If you cannot show a third “vaccination”, your Green Pass will lose its validity.  However, anyone who does not appear at their place of work because the Vatican gendarmerie denies them entry is considered to be absent "without excuse", is suspended from work without continued pay and risks being fired.

 That is the cruel "mercy" of Pope Francis in Corona madness year number three towards his own employees.

 Literally it says in the decree published yesterday by Cardinal Secretary of State Parolin:

“The absence leads to the consequent suspension of the wages for the duration of the absence, without prejudice to the pension and social assistance deductions as well as the family allowance".

 However, if the absence persists, one will be dismissed.

 The Cardinal Secretary of State describes this procedure as “appropriate measures” to “counteract the speaking of the current health emergency and to ensure that activities are carried out safely”.

Pope Francis gave his employees a "Christmas present" that weighs like a yoke on them.

Text: Giuseppe Nardi

Image: Church Militant (screenshot)

Trans: Tancred


Friday, December 24, 2021

The declaration of the Austrian Bishops' Conference on the government's compulsory vaccination - a pathetic document.

The declaration of the Austrian Bishops' Conference on the government's compulsory vaccination - a pathetic document.

 Notes from a stunned Martha Burger *

The focus is currently on Austria.  The discussion about mandatory vaccination is responsible for this.  The Alpine republic is the experimental laboratory for doing what not even the totalitarian communist China has done so far.  Austria's bishops yesterday published a statement giving the government the green light for radical intervention.  The Bishops' Conference stood behind the sharp fall that its President, Archbishop Franz Lackner OFM, made before the federal government on December 3rd (see Archbishop Lackner, wake up!).  The bishops say to the people in an exaggerated way: accept the compulsory vaccination and shut up.  They say it more euphemistically: accept the compulsory vaccination and be "reconciled".

 The bishops are not solving the corona issue because they apparently don't want to bring it into line.  They bypass all questions that concern them directly and that people want an answer to (see 32 Corona questions to the bishops and moral theologians).  It is regrettable, but it should be noted, that they have degenerated into an appendage to the government.  The Bishops' Conference executes the turquoise-green-red corona will.  What is meant by this - yesterday's government reshuffle showed it - the will of the hardliner duo Mikl-Leitner / Sobotka, two former ÖVP interior ministers from Lower Austria, who installed the third in the league, the previous interior minister Karl Nehammer, as the new Federal Chancellor yesterday.

History does not repeat itself.  What does repeat itself are mechanisms that work in history.  What we are experiencing right now is history for the history books.  An anonymous meme that circulates on the Internet, with a view to the incidence values ​​that are put forward by the governments as the basis of their coercive measures, articulates strikingly: "Warning: The current incidence is 1933".  One could also write: "Warning: the current incidence is 1984".  Who can hear, hear.

The bishops, above all their President, Archbishop Franz Lackner of Salzburg, and the most influential prince of the Austrian Bishops' Conference, Cardinal Christoph Schönborn, Archbishop of Vienna, neither hear nor see.  At least they pretend they can neither hear nor see.  They are led by a government that is blind and deaf.

Some details of the explanation

— No, the Covid vaccination is as little an “act of charity” as a disinfectant dispenser is a “place of charity”.  It is also not an "essential contribution":

— because the Covid gene therapies are not a vaccination and the Bishops' Conference is apparently unwilling to make this distinction correctly;

— because the Covid gene therapies are useless, i.e. not necessary, for 98 percent of the population, because SARS-CoV-2 does not pose a threat to them;

— because, according to the government, the Covid gene therapies would "protect" and is "safe", but this has not been proven by any independent studies;  rather, they seem rather ineffective, as demonstrated by vaccination failures ("vaccination breakthroughs"), hospitalized vaccinated people and vaccinated corona deaths;

— because the Covid gene therapies lead to vaccine damage, which, however,is denied by the same government and its supply chain for opinion control in the same apodictic style as they previously talked about (tested) the alleged "pandemic".

 The alleged “broad scientific consensus” of which the bishops speak cannot be grasped on the basis of scientific studies.  Where are the studies that support this “broad scientific consensus”?

How does the Bishops' Conference explain that the US FDA has recently decided not to make the reasons for the “emergency approval” of Pfizer / Biontech's gene preparation available until 2076?

How does the Bishops' Conference explain that the Italian government, despite a court ruling calling on it to do so, does not publish the reasons on which facts and whose recommendation made it the first western country to impose a lockdown at the beginning of March 2020?

Both questions concern Austria directly, on the one hand because of the provisional approval in the EU, which was only carried out in a crooked manner, on the other hand because the Austrian federal government imposed a lockdown a week after Italy and with reference to the Italian example as the second country.

Who “reports on a daily basis” that the resources in the hospitals are “exhausted” and that “even the most urgent operations have to be postponed”?  Where is the evidence for these claims and, most importantly, their contextualization?  Why do the bishops step onto the thin ice of government propaganda without need?

Like Archbishop Lackner last Friday, the Bishops' Conference also suppresses the fact that the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith excluded compulsory vaccination in its note of December 21, 2020 by stating that vaccination could only be voluntary.  With such central abbreviations, the bishops do not act as servants of the church, but as bailiffs of the government.

And no, nobody has to get vaccinated for SARS-CoV-2, because this virus has the relevance of an average flu.  Therefore, only the relatively small risk group has to weigh up between corona damage and vaccination damage, which should not be done lightly.  But the bishops do not say a word about this, just as the government does not.  On the contrary.  If it has her way, virtually everyone will be driven into the needle.  Where does this unusual vaccination fanaticism come from?  Shouldn't the bishops ask themselves that too?

In any case, nobody needs to be vaccinated to “protect the health system”.  Strengthening the health system would be the job of the government.  In the context of Covid-19, it would even be their only job.  Instead, the government turned a medical problem into a political one.  Only then did the matter begin its fateful course.  The bishops should finally demand that the government put the facts on the table, who or what prompted them to set fatal decisions in spring 2020 and why.  Until today she has not done that.  Wouldn't the knowledge of these fundamentals be the first prerequisite for being able to take a position at all, as the bishops did yesterday?  Do the bishops even have the information they need?  They cannot have this from the government because it does not communicate them.  But where from then?  From the politically controlled ORF?  From the daily newspaper, which is dependent on Corona special  press funding?

Incredible waste of money paired with hypocrisy

 Question to the bishops: What did the federal government, what did the state governments do during this time to strengthen the health system?  How many intensive care beds were newly created in the pandemic?  How many new staff were employed?  What improvements have been made for the self-sacrificing health workers (pay, working conditions, etc.)?

How much money was instead wasted on mass tests on healthy people who are without any sustainability?  Let's look at the numbers:

The total costs of the entire intensive treatment of all levels (personnel, medicine, energy, kitchen costs, laundry, etc.) for adults (children do not play a role in Corona) amounted to 931 million euros in Austria in 2016.

The total costs of the more than 99.9 percent pointless corona tests (since the state forces healthy people to test and does not bind a positive result to a clinical diagnosis despite contrary WHO guidelines) are estimated by the Federal Ministry of Health at 1.8 billion euros by the end of the year.  This does not even include tests in companies and schools, which make up two thirds of the tests estimated by the ministry.

In plain language, the government's corona policy wasted an enormous amount of money through the tests taken into account by the Ministry of Health in the cost accounting (approx. 60 percent of all tests), with which the capacities for intensive treatment could have been doubled.

Isn't that known to the bishops?

Because if they knew it, one would have to accuse not only the government but also them of hypocrisy.  What else are the federal government's crocodile tears about an “overloaded” health system that is being saved to death by the same government.  For many corona and vaccination deaths, this is tragically to be taken literally.

These 1.8 billion euros do not even include the costs for 40 percent of the tests and for the Covid gene preparations and for their storage, transport and delivery (premises, staff, vaccination buses, vaccination advertising, etc.), which are for the health service and  withdrawn from other areas, flow into someone's wallet.  They do exist, the Corona  profiteers.  The bishops do not see them.  They’re  looking in the wrong direction.

Limiting key points: Compulsory vaccination only if proportionate and without alternative

The bishops name restrictive cornerstones for compulsory vaccination.  Obviously, they are not serious about it.  In the context of their explanation, the comments seem to be more of an alibi to actually advertise the need for vaccination among byte faithful.  If they were serious, they should first and foremost have to state clearly and unequivocally that the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith has made it clear that vaccination (by which it wrongly means the genetic manipulation Covid syringe) can only be voluntary.  The bishops keep this fact quiet.

After all, they  write that a mandatory vaccination can only take place “with due regard to proportionality” and if “all other options have been exhausted”.  They also write that it is "ultimately" the "responsibility of the rulers to judge whether these conditions are met".  “Ultimately” say the bishops.  Up to this “ultimately”, however, a transparent, fair and open dialogue would have to be conducted.  A vaccination requirement is excluded a priori in connection with SARS-CoV-2 because of the low risk.  Because if a mandatory vaccination is enforced, what kind of “duties” will we have to face tomorrow?  Should the entire human species really be made dependent on the pharmaceutical industry?  Is that the human image of the year 2021?

By the way, what contribution do the bishops themselves make to the dialogue on these pressing questions?  What contribution do the bishops make to enable others to conduct this dialogue?  This does not take place.  It is only dictated from above.  Woe to you if you disagree!

According to their own declaration, the bishops are making no contribution.  This coincides with the painful observations made over the past 22 months.  The bishops do not say a word about the "proportionality" situation and whether "all other possibilities have actually been exhausted".  On the contrary: on December 3, Archbishop Lackner described the “vaccination” as “without alternative”.  This is not repeated in the statement of the bishops, but what is to be made of this restriction in view of the speech of their President?

Since Bill Gates declared that vaccination alone could “save us”, the government has not even considered “other options”, let alone “exhausted them”.  Rather, it prevents other possibilities, such as the approval of real vaccines, such as Hungary and San Marino have done for example.  She is boycotting drug therapy for Covid-19, which would automatically relieve the burden on the healthcare system through treatment at home.

The restrictions on compulsory vaccination mentioned by the bishops cannot be meant seriously for this reason alone, otherwise they would have admonished the rulers to finally give up the one-sided vaccination fixation.

Are the vaccination dead of a "temporary" mandatory vaccination only "temporarily" dead?

When the bishops finally speak of a “temporary compulsory vaccination”, this can only be understood as a euphemism.  Otherwise it would be mockery.  Spiking with a genetic manipulation preparation, which the bishops themselves describe as a “serious interference with the physical integrity and freedom of the individual”, cannot be reversed.  So what does “temporary” mean when the goal is to spike everyone?

Is that how cheap you want to make the poisoned apple palatable?

The pastor of St. Ulrich am Pillersee in Tyrol (Archdiocese of Salzburg) died on November 22nd, one day after his third vaccination.  The chronological sequence more than suggests a causal relationship to be assumed.  This one tragic death, which is currently repeated across the whole of the country, should have prompted the Archdiocese of Salzburg to be extremely careful with regard to “vaccination” and compulsory vaccination.  Nothing like that happened.  Some scribes hastened to deny any connection with clairvoyant gifts.  Anyone who asked legitimate questions was accused of spreading fake news.  The archdiocese has remained silent since then and deleted the dead pastor from the diocese's personal database days ago.

In the opinion of the bishops, how should one imagine the "temporary" obligation to vaccinate for vaccinated dead and vaccinated victims?  Are they even “temporarily” dead or disabled?

As a reminder, when someone dies of a virus (unless artificially created), that's the way of things.  When someone dies of a vaccination, it is a pointless, man-made death, and there are clear sources or blame.

Yes, bad things are going on.  They only affect a virus peripherally.  To a far greater extent, they concern a non-transparent, authoritarian and fact-free government policy.  And above all they concern abysses in interpersonal dealings, in dealing with other people and their dignity.  These abysses show up, which is very painful, also with the bishops, especially Archbishop Lackner.  The pastor of St. Ulrich am Pillersee, who received the third vaccination and dies, affects Archbishop Lackner directly.  The censorship against Dean Ignaz Steinwender, when he published an orientation guide for the vaccination, affects Archbishop Lackner directly.

And anyway: What does “temporary vaccination” mean?  Anyone who lets themselves be spiked “buys” a vaccination subscription.  A government expert has already said that a “booster vaccination” may be necessary every month.  The government has lured people into the "vaccination" with the promise that it would then be "over".  In reality, nothing is over.  Now do the bishops want to drive people into “vaccination” with a similarly misleading promise?  No, your Excellencies, this “vaccination” never ends, because the wrong course set by the government does not allow an end from the beginning (through mandatory mass PCR tests).  And once the mandatory vaccination has been introduced, the “temporary” mandatory vaccination becomes a permanent mandatory vaccination.  Will someone then apologize to the people?  No, the government has not kept a corona promise so far and has never apologized.  Apart from that: What use is an apology if, with the blessing of the bishops, the permanent vaccination regime is in place?  The PCR tests are then no longer needed, at least according to government fantasies.  Then there is no longer any need for a virus.  The law then forces every citizen to be “vaccinated” twice, three times, four times (twelve times?) A year.  Virus or not.  Those who do not lose their civil rights.

And the icing on the cake: It will never have been officially verified whether SARS-CoV-2 is really the threat claimed by the government.  A few years ago the term "post-factual" was in vogue.  Now you know what is meant by that.  Reality was yesterday.  What counts today is who can enforce his fiction.

So where and how should healing occur when the damage is in full swing?

How is healing to be made if those who cause harm do not turn away and the bishops encourage them to do so?

Unilaterally assumed inability to discourse

Do the bishops make fun of the people when they write in their declaration: "Unfortunately, a threatening level of discourse inability has already been reached"?

The bishops do not indicate with a word that with this statement they mean, or at least mean, the government and the opinion-controlling media close to the government.  Why not?  The inability to discourse, which can actually be ascertained to a terrifying extent, comes from the government.  The mainstream media are even actively preventing the discourse in government wake.  This development is not just a few days or weeks old, but almost two years old.  Didn't the bishops even notice?  Do you not even notice the one-sidedness with which a certain corona narrative is dictated and other opinions are suppressed and defamed?

Are you not familiar with the qualitative difference between the inability of individual citizens to discourse and the inability of the government and the mass media to discourse?

Not only that: the bishops even unilaterally pass the “buck” on to the concerned citizens, who often feel powerless because they have not been heard for many months, but are ostracized and insulted.  The division of society, Excellencies, does not come from the common citizen, because he has no access to the ORF, no access to the daily newspapers, no access to the ministries and the medical associations, and certainly not to the corona profiteers.  You don't even have access to the bishops, who have already sealed themselves off and supported the corona policy tacitly or hastily (remember the ban on public services), and who have now passed over to open complicity.

What would you call it when the bishops do not reproach those responsible in government and the media, but they do reproach the people?  How do the bishops define government membership?

The bishops warn, albeit late, that people who do not want to be vaccinated should not be denigrated across the board.  But what is compulsory vaccination if not this denigration by the state?  Or do the bishops want to say that one shouldn't verbally abuse the unvaccinated, but one may disregard their conscience and vaccinate them against their will?

“We urgently need a salutary disarmament of words and gestures”, but that requires the government to give up its authoritarian compulsive fantasies.  At this point, as at others, the statement by the bishops falls short.  Why?  Because it is the highest maxim of the bishops in everything they say: not to criticize the government.  Not even a government that is seriously threatening to lock a third of the people (and the trend is rising) in prison from next year?

What will happen when the two-thirds who were spiked for believing the government realize they have been betrayed?  Yesterday alone, the vaccination status of 300,000 Austrians was changed from "vaccinated" to "unvaccinated".

Action is required for healing and reconciliation

First, the end of the government's insane corona policy, the total failure of which is only not yet generally apparent because it is doggedly covered up by the mainstream media.  But how long will that be possible?

Second, an end to dictation and instead an honest, free and open discourse about corona politics.  Linked to this must be a return to real information instead of propaganda.

It should therefore be made clear that SARS-CoV-2 is neither a killer virus nor a threat to the general public.  It's no more dangerous than your average flu.  As long as this fact is not recognized, any Corona fight will remain "deception and delusion", as it is currently sung so appropriately in the Advent song "O come, come, Emmanuel":

If these two conditions are met, especially the first, healing and reconciliation will break out.

Thirdly, I would like to say a word to the bishops: They have proven a terrifying failure in the Corona crisis, which in their area is not inferior to the total failure of the government's Corona policy.  One reason for this is the subservience with which they offer themselves to the government.  The climax of this unworthy attitude is the appearance of Archbishop Franz Lackner on December 3rd in Vienna and the seriously deficient declaration of the Bishops' Conference published yesterday

Finally, as a serious warning, a word from a letter to the reader:

"Lord, in heaven, you help us, because government and bishops have betrayed us! "

The statement of the Austrian Bishops' Conference in the wording:

Protection.  Heal.  Reconcile.

Declaration by the Catholic bishops on the debate about a temporary vaccination requirement

The corona pandemic, which has dominated our lives for almost two years, continues to present us with great challenges.  In the meantime, various vaccines are in use around the world that have been shown to provide protection against severe disease.  Nevertheless, quite a few people in our country have not yet accepted this vaccination offer.  The reasons for this are diverse.  Now the state intends to introduce a legal obligation to vaccinate against the coronavirus.  As bishops, we would like to help clarify the issues related to this.


A broad scientific consensus rates vaccination against Covid-19 as an essential contribution to protecting people from serious, even life-threatening illness.  Those who get vaccinated also protect the public health systems from overload and all those who need intensive medical treatment not because of Corona, but for other reasons.  It is reported daily that the resources in the hospitals are exhausted and that even the most urgent operations have to be postponed.  For this reason we urge the bishops to be vaccinated again.  We recall the words of Pope Francis: “Vaccination is an act of charity”.  However, since the previous calls have not been sufficient, the government is now planning a temporary legal obligation to vaccinate.

Compulsory vaccination is a serious interference with the physical integrity and freedom of the individual.  It is therefore only permissible if all other possibilities have been exhausted, taking proportionality into account, in order to protect the population - in the event of a pandemic, the health system and thus human life.  Ultimately, it is the responsibility of those in power to assess whether the prerequisites are met and whether a temporary vaccination requirement is now the appropriate means of protecting the common good.  We cannot give a detailed vote on the concrete form of the law and will therefore not take part in the assessment process.  However, we would like to point out that it is urgently necessary to make exceptions due to the situation or health and also to keep the legal consequences within an appropriate framework.  The goal must be to protect health and freedom equally.


Along with the debate about the appropriateness of measures to combat Covid, we perceive a dangerous polarization in society.  It shows itself in the overheated and disrespectful way of attacking each other with careless accusations, insinuations and violent language.  Unfortunately, a threatening level of incapacity for discourse has already been reached.  In addition to appropriate forms of protest, the state measures to contain the pandemic are increasingly related to the Nazi regime of injustice.  Such shameful trivializing of Nazi crimes must not be tolerated.  It also meets with our absolute incomprehension when people who fight for the lives of people in medical care and nursing are mocked.  It is also decided to reject the blanket denigration of all who do not want to be vaccinated.

We urgently need a salutary disarmament of words and gestures.  Too many injuries and rifts have already happened, presumably with dangerous long-term consequences for our family and social relationships.  We have to work towards a new culture of conversation at all levels.  Listening is healing!  Let's do everything we can to learn this most important prerequisite for every successful communication over and over again.  Only respect for opposing opinions and different points of view can ensure peaceful coexistence.  However, this also includes the general acceptance of legal requirements that must be met in the interests of the common good.


Advent is the time of preparation for the feast of the birth of Jesus.  Many people these days long for more silence, deceleration and relief.  For this reason we propose, right now, to avoid unnecessary outrages and fruitless debates as far as possible.

Let us refrain from anything that might degrade, hurt, or humiliate someone.  A collective pause like this would do us all good.  Let us use the time to reflect on our own point of view and to think about the contribution to reconciliation that each of us can make in our living environment.  Let us also use the time of Advent for personal and common prayer, in which we give space to the healing presence of God.  We bishops expressly invite you to do so!  Prayer doesn't need many words, just an openness of mind and heart.

Protecting, Healing and Reconciling is an Advent program that is a real alternative.  It shows an ingenious way to a reconciled coexistence, which our country absolutely needs in the face of the great challenge.  "Be humble, peaceable and patient, bear one another in love and strive to maintain the unity of the Spirit through the bond of peace" (Ephesians 4: 2f), the apostle Paul calls out to us.

We consciously ask God's blessings for all people in this challenging time!

 Vienna, December 6th, 2021

 * added by Giuseppe Nardi

 Image: (screenshot)

Trans: Tancred


What are they planning after Omicron?


Saturday, December 18, 2021

Anti-CovidRestriction Protests in London Turn Nasty for Establishment

[Daily Mail] Video footage of the incident shows antagonistic protesters remonstrating with police. 

As well as Plan B, the demonstrators are opposed to the possible introduction of vaccine passports and the future imposition of a more restrictive Plan C.  

Later in the afternoon, at around 3pm, another crowd of protestors stopped on Regent Street where they began abusing people inside and hurling eggs at the property, police said. 

Officers remain in the area to 'monitor the situation'. No arrests have been made.


Friday, December 17, 2021

Nigel Farage Interviews South African Doctor About Omicron


You Can Get Abortion Pill to Murder a Baby, But No to Ivermectin

 Edit: they really want to shit down people dealing with this plandemic with effective remedies, don’t they?

As long as women continue murdering and stifling the next generation of European Christians, it’s ok. The destruction of the West must continue!

[Daily Mail] Under US regulations on the pill, it must be dispensed in clinics or hospitals by specially-certified providers who must sign an agreement, and obtain the patient's signature to acknowledge the provider informed them about the drug.

The second drug in the regimen, misoprostol, which is taken up to 48 hours after the first, though. has long been obtainable with a prescription at any pharmacy. 

But on Thursday, the Food and Drug Administration means that medication abortion will become more readily available to women who find it burdensome to travel to an abortion clinic, and those who would like to terminate their pregnancies from the comfort of their own home.

It allows patients to have a telemedicine appointment with a provider who can prescribe them the abortion pills, and send them to the patient by mail.

The decision, though, comes as the Supreme Court is set to hear a major case about abortion rights - and could overturn Roe v. Wade. 


Tuesday, December 14, 2021

Quarantine the "vaccinated" right now!

 Well, that would be the most sensible thing to do following the logic of the past two years.   However, Omicron is really a blessing for two reasons.  First, it is showing how ineffective the vaccines are when those in power are trying to get everyone jabbed to eliminate the Control Group (those still un-jabbed).  Secondly, historically, the most effective vaccines have contained live attenuate viruses (virii?).   That's what Omicron is, it just isn't administered via a needle.  This thing could spread like fire giving everyone natural immunity, including the sheep who got jabbed.