Sunday, March 3, 2024

Flagship Nicolaite Church in Spain to Be Shuttered

Edit: Francis will probably intervene! I’m shocked he hasn’t done so already!

EL ESCORIAL, Spain (LifeSiteNews) — A Catholic church near the Spanish capital may be subject to deconsecration after a simulated homosexual “wedding” was held there.

The sacrilegious wedding-like ceremony took place in a private Catholic chapel, part of the Finca El Campillo, a palace residence in the Spanish town of El Escorial.

Father Florentino de Andrés, a parish priest in El Escorial, told the Spanish-language outlet ACI Presna that he had no prior knowledge of the event. He said that he would talk to the property owners, and if the reports of what happened were correct, he would demand that the chapel be deconsecrated.


Saturday, March 2, 2024

Modesty in Speach

Let's hear it for Brother Nathanael!

What?!? Not even the Flu Shot is safe?


Evil Belgian Bishops Push for "Deaconesses" and the Abolition of Celibacy

Belgium's bishops will propose the introduction of "deacons" and the abolition of "compulsory celibacy" at the second and final session of the Synodality Synod in Rome next October. According to the bishops, the starting point for their reflections is the question of what “society, culture and the times in which we live teach us”.

When exploring this question, they came to the conclusion, on the one hand, that the position of women had developed to such an extent that it made sense to ordain women as “deacons”. In addition, according to the Belgian bishops, the requirement of celibacy for priests is “highly controversial” and should therefore be abolished.

Of course, there is no lack of appeasing restrictions. Belgium's bishops point out that "deaconesses" are not priests and have only limited powers, i.e. they can "only" celebrate weddings and conduct baptisms...

According to the bishops, the abolition of (annoying) celibacy would also clear the way for “viri probati”, i.e. married men with families who are committed to the faith, to be ordained priests. And here too there is the restriction that these married priests cannot become bishops.

However, the reference to “restrictions” is meant quite differently, namely that for the time being only “deaconesses” are wanted. The demand for “priestesses” and “bishops” will be delivered in a next step. The same should apply to married priests, who will also be able to become bishops in the next step. The model of the Belgian bishops is obviously not the Eastern Orthodox Church, but rather Western Protestantism.

“The transfer of greater pastoral responsibilities to women, as well as the ordination of women to the diaconate, should not be universally obligatory or prohibited,” the Belgian bishops write in the draft text they distributed to the country's dioceses to outline their position for the Synodality Synod in October to prepare. Walloon and Flemish bishops agree on this. The German-French Rhenish Alliance of the Second Vatican Council still exists today, as the example of Belgium shows.

According to the Belgian bishops, “gender equality and the importance of equal opportunities for men and 

women are not fashion trends, but rather developments that reaffirm the New Testament understanding of the equality of men and women in Christ”. Even if Jesus Christ himself was probably too much of a man, two thousand years ago he did not seem to have been aware of this in the same emancipatory spirit of the bishops.

The bishops have not explained exactly how this progressive thinking can be derived from Holy Scripture and tradition. Instead, they provide a “striking” example of logical thinking, realizing that “more and more women are taking on pastoral tasks.” Therefore, they concluded, the question is legitimate whether women can also be admitted to the ordained service of the diaconate.” The priority of practice over theory could hardly be demonstrated more clearly.

The bishops answered the question themselves in the expected sense. Since women “take on pastoral tasks,” the question of whether they should also receive ordination positions should be answered with a clear yes.

The sources of these innovations can be found elsewhere than in the Bible and tradition, namely in neo-Marxist thinking, which, for example, drives the Greens, in whose ranks quite a few of today's church hierarchs feel emotionally at home, at least in the German-speaking world, seem. The leanings of certain parts of the church towards the New Left have been known since the student protests of 1968 and can be documented right down to the last diocese. Now that the former New Left is in government in the German-speaking world under different labels, it only seems obvious that its thinking should also try to break ground in the church sector.

The second point of the Episcopal Révolution belge / Belgian Revolutie is similar. Since when revolutions actually start from above is a completely different question. The latter is likely to have something to do with pent-up demand. Neo-Marxist thought lives in the constant, highly romanticized striving for the “revolution” that will make everything new, but which its epigones were never able to implement. Apparently they want to make up for it now that they are in power. Who cares about the contradiction: Practically speaking, practice corrects every theoretical deficit.

Belgium's bishops point to “increasing problems” with priestly vocations. They see the reason for this, again as expected, in a central obstacle: the “lively questioning” of the requirement of celibacy. This is essentially seen as coercion and is rejected.

The implementation scenario resulting from both demands, which are called “proposals”, is known: “Every bishops’ conference or continental assembly of bishops should be enabled to take certain measures regarding the ordination of priests who are viri probati”, which in plain language, means ordaining married men as priests. The same should apply to the introduction of “deaconesses”. No bishop's conference and no bishop should be forced to ordain women, but those who want to should be able to do so.

The method behind it is what Francis describes as the “synodal church” and what he has already told the entire church when admitting believers in irregular situations (homosexuals, adulterers, etc.) to communion through Amoris laetitia and of homosexual couples, in “wilder Marriage” imposed on cohabiting or adulterous couples for blessing by Fiducia supplicans.

The advantage of this method: It can be extended to all areas.

This method is the result of a painful and long learning process in neo-modernist church circles. Painful and long because they were unable to bring the 1968 revolution into the church to the extent and speed they had hoped. Popes John Paul II and Benedict XVI stood by them  and in their way for 35 yearsAnd already with Paul VI., they had previously fallen out when the revolutionary impetus became too impetuous and went too far, even though they themselves came from their ranks.

Modernism had failed twice in a century – and in 2013 it seemed almost dead. It failed because there was too much resistance in the church. The lesson learned from this was that another path had to be taken. There should no longer be any attempt to change the doctrine. The election of Pope Francis made the new path possible. By allowing each bishop's conference and each bishop to decide for themselves in their jurisdiction whether an innovation is introduced or not, there is no need for general resolutions that have always failed in the past. There is no decision or resolution that remarried divorced people should be admitted to communion and that gay couples should be blessed. Formally, everything remains unchanged, but it is permitted - for “purely pastoral reasons”, as it is emphasized - if one in a diocese is of the opinion that one would like to do things differently...

The “brilliant” and fatal thing about it is that this instrument can be used universally and everywhere.

According to progressive thinking, it is assumed that once an innovation has been introduced there is no going back. The power of the fact leads to habituation and thus to slow acceptance. In other words: the dioceses led by progressive bishops are rushing forward and the conservative bishops are supposed to block and prevent it, because the decisive breakthrough compared to before has already been achieved. And in the dioceses that are still missing from the progressive appeal, it is only a matter of time before the incumbent conservative, blocking bishop is sooner or later replaced by a progressive one. That takes some time, but is effective, while the direct attack against the traditional religious and moral teachings did not succeed despite massive battering rams.

That's exactly what the Belgian bishops say, and twice: the ordination of women as "deaconesses" "should neither be generally obligatory nor forbidden"; “The priestly ordination of viri probati should be neither generally obligatory nor forbidden.”

The draft they sent to the dioceses should now be examined, discussed and possibly changed by mid-May. A final version should then be formulated and sent to the Synod Secretariat for the second and decisive session of the Synodality Synod.

Someone might say: Belgium only has nine dioceses, but the universal Church has 3,190. So what does it matter if 0.28 percent of diocesan bishops howl at the moon? However, the reality is different.

The coincidence of the thinking of Pope Francis and the Belgian bishops has been known at least since the revelation by Johan Bonny, Bishop of Antwerp, at the general assembly of the German Synodal Way in March 2023. Bonny, a “protege” of Cardinal Godfried Danneels, who was supported by the like-minded Apostolic Nuncio at the time, Karl-Josef Rauber, who foisted him on Pope Benedict XVI., (Pope Francis rewarded Rauber with the dignity of a cardinal for his services), who then announced at the time that since Amoris Laetitia it had been “normal” in Belgium to bless gay couples. Belgium's bishops informed Francis in November 2022 during their ad limina visit to Rome that they had designed their own gay blessing ritual. Francis did not admonish or correct them, but approved of their actions. The only prerequisite for their frontal attack on the Church's teaching on marriage and morality was that "you all agree."

In the area of homo-heresy there is therefore a direct and close agreement between Francis and the Belgian bishops. Why shouldn’t the same interaction also exist in the area of “deaconesses” and married priests? The current move by the Belgian bishops suggests exactly this.

Finally, it should not be forgotten that both points, both the admission of women to ordination and the relaxation of celibacy, were already on the agenda at the Amazon Synod in 2019 . What didn't work back then should now be made up for. In Rome it is said that a step towards women's diaconate could be expected in the coming weeks. It seems clear that everything should be done at the latest with the Synodality Synod in October , as a sort of preparation for the Holy Year 2025, with which it is hoped to calm down the believing people somewhat.

Image: VaticanMedia (screenshot)

Trans: Tancred


Tuesday, February 27, 2024

Friday, February 23, 2024

Cardinal McElroy attributes opposition to Fiducia supplicans to “anti-gay sentiment.”

Robert McElroy, a Bergoglian straight out of a picture book (from Santa Marta)

After Pope Francis recently stated that the resistance to the Fiducia supplicans declaration concerns “small groups” of “hypocrites,” one of his close confidants in the USA, Cardinal Robert McElroy, Bishop of San Diego, followed up and claimed that the resistance to widespread homophobia in church circles was going away.


Much of the opposition to Rome's permission for priests to bless gay couples and other couples who find themselves in an objectively sinful position is based not on doctrinal principles, Cardinal McElroy said, but on a "long-standing hostility" against gays and lesbians. The notorious US Bergoglian made this statement at a congress on the subject of the Synodality Synod sponsored by the Archdiocese of Los Angeles .

“It is entirely legitimate for a priest to personally refuse to perform the blessings described in Fiducia supplicans because he believes that this would undermine the strength of marriage,” said the cardinal. But it is “particularly troubling in our own country that resistance to Fiducia focuses overwhelmingly on the blessing of people in same-sex relationships and less on men and women in canonically invalid heterosexual relationships.”


As is well known, there are no limits to dialectics. It is now known that Cardinal McElroy, as Bishop of San Diego, does not object to the blessing of gay couples or other irregular relationships. But he wants to criticize the critics of Fiducia supplicans all the more and thus accommodate the Bergoglian agenda. The “logic” is even used that the criticism of the papal homosexual agenda cannot be valid because other irregular situations are not also criticized. 

This dialectical game from the mouth of a cardinal sounds like this:

“If the reason for rejecting these blessings is indeed that such a practice dilutes and undermines the marital bond, then the rejection should be at least equally focused on the blessings for these heterosexual relationships in our country. We all know why this is not the case.” Because, says McElroy, there is “a long-standing hostility from too many people towards LGBT people.”

The sinner, who is a criminal in the eyes of God, is declared a victim, and the critics of public sin are labeled hypocrites. Bergoglio lo vult.

It is not the only insinuation that Cardinal McElroy makes to defend Fiducia supplicans . He claims that the critics of the Roman declaration do not act in defense of the truth of the faith, i.e. for compelling, objective and well-founded reasons, but out of subjective arbitrariness because they have an aversion to homosexuals. For progressives like McElroy, homosexuality is not a problem; its sinfulness is swept under the carpet, at best mentioned in an unheard aside, and there is no longer any talk of it being one of the four blatant sins.

No, this has nothing to do with the doctrine of faith, says McElroy, whom Francis made a cardinal because of his merits, such as this statement, but only with personal, arbitrary aversions.

And everything has been clarified dogmatically and morally anyway, says McElroy, since Fiducia supplicans does not force any bishop or priest to give gay blessings. If one follows the Bergoglian US cardinal, this option regulation makes any check as to whether Fiducia supplicans is orthodox  or heterodox superfluous.

The Cardinal of Francis' grace appears to be a master of obfuscation and attempts to raise false questions in order to distract from the real ones. It goes without saying that McElroy reiterates that “no doctrinal change was made” with Fiducia supplicans.

Progressive churchmen like McElroy have a clear agenda, but for the purpose of deception they do not say it openly and distort the facts. The legalization of homosexuality is the most important point of the Bergoglian agenda.

Text: Giuseppe Nardi
Image : VaticanInfo

Trans: Tancred


++Dolan Isn’t the First to Stage a Stunt for Degeneracy

Edit: I wonder if people are thinking this sort of thing is unprecedented? Perhaps Cardinal Schönborn is chaffing about the recognition going to ++Dolan? Surely, ++Schönborn would courageously embrace this disgrace if it had happened in Stepansdom, Vienna’s Cathedral and one of Europe’s most glorious cathedrals.  Even Schönborn removed the blasphemous Hrdlicka’s Last Supper when pressed by popular opinion. He moved it into the bookstore and downplayed the whole thing. But he later made it up to the artist, Alfred Hrdlicka.

If there are still people around who remember Alfred Hrdlicka, who was a Marxist aberrosexual who fashioned the demonic Saint Restituta shrine at Stepandsdom in Austria. He died in 2009. The Freemason Cathedral Rector officiated at his funeral, where the local Communists and Antifa (who routinely collaborate with the police to attack Austrian Prolifers) were in attendance and Hrdlicka  was even buried in the cathedral cemetery.

It’s an event that touches on degeneracy and Freemasonry. It’s certainly good timing for another Cardinal to push Freemasonry

Opus Devil is wrong again, Tay-Tay attacks Dolan. Back to the drawing board there, Opus Devil.


Sunday, February 18, 2024

The Clot Thickens


Monday, February 12, 2024

CIA Tucker Says Moscow is Nicer Than Any American City

Edit: get ready for the wailing and raving of the usual crowd, the chattering asses. 



US Professional Football is Gay

 Edit: this ad for the Pooper Bowl is an appallingly saccharine attempt to justify sins that cry out to heaven for vengeance, the destruction of the West by unopposed Islamic invasion, vagrancy and baby killing.

Shout out to Mel Gibson Fan Channel.

Apparently this is an ad campaign, “He gets us”. I found this in Tay-tay’s Twitter.


Saturday, February 10, 2024

People like Gaybrielle won't be happy until they can be hooked up with an IV drip

We never expected any more from Mark Shea who probably writes his own letters to the editor, but the hierarchy needs to be held accountable for their complicity in trying to wipe out brown people.

with the vestment and sacramental of a new religion

Wednesday, February 7, 2024

Musclehead Swishop Baron Says God Fired Elijah for Killing the Priests of Baal

Edit: just keep posting your Ls muscle man! Maybe Thug can take over as his spotter?



Two guys who get everything wrong about Galileo

Bergoglio's Consciousness Raising C9 Discusses Deaconesses With Judaizing Liturgical Dancer, Anglican Priestess and Alleged Sex Predator Cardinal Lacroix

The renewed C9 Council of Cardinals discusses “upgrading the role of women in the Church”. 
Also present is Cardinal Lacroix (Encircled), who is being investigated in Canada for homosexual abuse. In the background the three speakers: (from left) Giuliva Di Berardino, Sr. Linda Pocher and the Anglican bishop Jo Bailey Wells.

(Rome) The Council of Cardinals C9, which advises Pope Francis on the leadership of the universal Church, is currently meeting in Rome. It is already the second meeting of the Council of Cardinals with the topic: enhancing the “role of women in the Church”. The rumor has been going around for months that everything is being prepared to introduce a female diaconate.

Sunday, February 4, 2024

The Political Engagement of Jorge Mario Bergoglio ad maiorum Soros gloriam


By José Arturo Quarracino*

Criticizing the current pontiff as a Peronist and overlooking his undignified commitment to and connections to the predatory and genocidal plutocracy is not only a grave mistake. It also leads to the spiritual, religious and political impotence of trying to make the Catholic Church missionary and evangelizing by tolerating the fact that the “homoaffective” prelates (Tucho Fernández dixit) are a bunch of Satanists and not shepherds of the flock Jesus Christ entrusted to them.

In his recent, excellent article “El proceso sinodal, la temible 'caja de Pandora' ” (“ The Synodal Process and the Dreaded Pandora's Box” ) 1 , Argentine Archbishop Emeritus Héctor Rubén Aguer  argues it is like an inverted pyramid: all Church institutions should remain connected to the people and always start from the bottom.”  As an Argentinian, I see in these papal inclinations the ideological matrix of Peronism (to clarify: I refer to the thinking of Juan Domingo Perón, three-time president of Argentina).

I repeat the excellent remarks of Msgr. Aguer in the above-mentioned text, which no believer interested in the current affairs of the Catholic Church should miss. Except for one caveat, which leads me, for the first time, to disagree with the prelate's claim about the Peronist "ideological matrix" underlying the Bergoglian conception of the "people."

This belief in the image of a “Peronist Bergoglio” is not limited to the archbishop. Whenever the various forms of political behavior of Jorge Mario Bergoglio are analyzed, various authors resort to this image, but it is completely distorted and unreal, since strictly speaking the current Bishop of Rome was never a Peronist and did not rely on one concept and ideology to formulate his ecclesiological doctrine.

This distorted image was fueled by the fact that in the early 1970s, when Jorge Mario Bergoglio had just been elected provincial superior of the Society of Jesus in Argentina, he managed to establish a political connection with a Peronist organization of the time - the Iron Guard. It was a connection that enabled the then Jesuit Provincial to place the administration and management of the famous Universidad del Salvador, originally founded by the Jesuit Order in 1958, in the hands of that organization in 1975. It was a tactical alliance of convenience that dissolved within a few years, severing Bergoglio's connection with the group's leadership. 2

To understand Bergoglio's attitude and behavior in the position he has held since 2013, we must look at, on the one hand, his Jesuitism and, on the other hand, his subordination to the globalism promoted by the Rothschild dynasty and the political strategies of George Soros, a political actor in the aforementioned banking family.

As to the first point, it is typical of his Jesuitism to act formally as the superiors general of the Society of Jesus did, including St. Ignatius of Loyola himself, often exercising absolute and brutal command in the manner of a military commander , e.g. by dismissing bishops without cause and without observing canonical administrative procedures. Another example of Jesuitism is also the methodology and dynamics applied in the Synodality Synod that Jesuits exercise in the famous Ignatian Exercises. And the recourse to the mental reservations that have characterized the nefarious and hypocritical actions of various Jesuits throughout history - the case of Mirko Ivan Rupnik being the most recent of these - is highlighted in a recent well explained article by Augustinus Hipponensis, “ Joseph Ratzinger, Jesuitism and Saint Peter: Questions of Coherence ” 3

Bergoglio's recent intervention in defense of the sacrilegious and blasphemous declaration Fiducia supplicans, in which he justifies the "non-liturgical and non-ritual" blessing of same-sex couples by stating: "(...) when a couple spontaneously asks for the blessing, It is not the connection that is blessed, but simply the people who asked for it together. "Not the covenant, but the persons" 4, in a very clear example of this hypocritical exercise of the mental reservations so dear to Jesuitism: what is implied and "thought" by this argument is that the couple comes to ask for a blessing, but at the very moment of the blessing their union falls apart and after the blessing they are reunited.

As for the second point, Bergoglio's Peronist populism, this characterization is unfortunately not accurate, because it overlooks a fact: Bergoglio's "devotion" to the people does not come from his late approach to Peronism, but from the strategy of the Jesuit order, which was outlined by the then Superior General Pedro Arrupe (1965–1983) and in the XXXI. and XXXII. General Congregation of the Society of Jesus (1965-1966 and 1974-1975) in order to inculturate the Jesuit order in the life of the people and to identify with it.

That is, Bergoglio adopts the term “people” not because of his proximity to Peronism – the largest Argentine popular movement of the 20th century – but because of his membership in the Society of Jesus .

Why is it important to clarify this confusion? Because what Bergoglio promoted during his pontificate is not “Peronist populism”, but the divisive, multifaceted and progressive politics that George Soros has promoted in the hearts of nations over the past decades, in order to create “new” concepts and ideas among peoples, to spread practices that are in direct contradiction to the great humanistic and Christian tradition that has shaped the souls and feelings of the peoples of the earth throughout history. Something very similar to what Bergoglio is doing in the Office of St. Peter: abolition of the liturgical and doctrinal tradition, veneration of Pachamama, criticism of “indietrism,” new “doctrinal pastoral developments,” neutralization of the two-thousand-year-old ecclesiastical magisterium, priority of “pastoral charity” over that doctrinal truth, etc.

Already in December 2020, Father Jorge Mario, together with Cardinal Peter Turkson, formalized the Vatican's alliance with the Council for Inclusive Capitalism , promoted, institutionalized and led by Baroness Lynn Forester de Rothschild. 5

And last year, the Bishop of Rome placed control of the teaching, research, promotion and dissemination of the Church's social teachings in the hands of the Soros family 's Open Society Foundations and rejected the evangelization of America as part of Catholic teaching. 6  For this purpose, Pan-American Committee of Judges for Social Rights and Franciscan Doctrine was incorporated into the Vatican structure as a private association of believers with an international character and the Fray Bartolomé de las Casas Institute was founded to research and promote the social rights for academic, teaching and training purposes on the topics of social rights, migration and colonialism, whose board members are affiliated with the Open Society Foundations .7 The Bishop of Rome has thus placed control of the social teaching of the Catholic Church in the hands of one of the political arms of the Rothschild family, distancing true Catholics from this social apostolate.

In other words, Father Jorge Mario Bergoglio acts in his pontificate not as a pontiff, but as a political agent of George Soros, the front man of one of the families that own the world. This is the essence of Bergoglio's papal practice: transforming the Church of Christ into a hybrid, ad maiorem Soros' gloriam.

In this sense, the Bishop of Rome neither commits a mistake nor exercises a heterodox papacy: rather, he implements a political plan to colonize and neutralize the missionary and evangelizing work of the Church.

Criticizing him as a “Peronist,” which he never was and is not, and ignoring his progressive anti-Catholic work is a grave mistake that leads to spiritual, religious and political impotence, which is exactly what the great enemy of God wants and intends for humanity.

When King Antiochus Epiphanes in the 2nd century B.C. when the “abomination of desolation” was carried out in the Temple of Jerusalem in the 1st century BC, Judas Maccabee and his brothers led the rebellion against the blasphemous crime.8 Where is the Catholic rebellion today in the face of the “abomination of desolation” being committed in the bosom of the Church of Christ?

*José Arturo Quarracino, Professor Emeritus of Philosophy at the Universidad del Salvador in Buenos Aires.

Image: Wikicommons/Flickr/ by Michael Wuertenberg

1 Héctor Rubén Aguer: El processo sinodal, la temible 'caja de Pandora'.

2 Details about this connection and the myth of the “Peronist Bergoglio” can be found in the interview “ Bergoglio is not a Peronist . ”

3 Augustinus Hipponensis: Joseph Ratzinger, il gesuitismo e S. Pietro: questioni di coerenza , January 23, 2024 .

Address of the Holy Father Francis to the participants in the general assembly of the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith, January 26, 2024; see also: Francis officially commented on Fiducia supplicans for the first time, January 29, 2024.

5 José Arturo Quarracino: The 30 Monedas de Plata al Concejo para el Capitalismo Inclusivo, March 16, 2021 ; see also: Mel Gibson: The Vatican is a wolf in sheep's clothing. Francis, the agenda of the globalists and 'monsters with miters' , September 15, 2021.

Joint Statement of the Dicasteries for Culture and Education and for Promoting Integral Human Development on the “Doctrine of Discovery” , March 30, 2023.

Quirógrafo del Santo Padre por el cual erige el “Comité Panamericano de Juezas y Jueces por los Derechos Sociales y la Doctrina Franciscana (COPAJU) como Asociación privada de Falles with character internacional, y creat bajo su dependencia el “Instituto de Investigaciones jurídicas Fray Bartolomé de las Casas , August 15, 2023; see also: “Inexplicable appointments” by Pope Francis, September 4, 2023 .

8 1 Mac 1:57; Deuteronomy 9:27; cf. Mt 24:15.