Thursday, December 12, 2013
++Müller Complains Against the Lack of Solidarity With Bishop Tebartz-van Elst
Curial Archbishop Gerhard Ludwig Müller: It is not Christian, "if you duck for cover from one of the dirtiest and most inhuman campaigns against a man, fellow Christian, pastor and bishop"
Passau (kath.net / CBA / PNP / pm) Curia Archbishop Gerhard Ludwig Müller has lamented a lack of solidarity with the Limburg Bishop Franz-Peter van Elst Tebartz again. It is not Christian, "if you duck for cover at one of the dirtiest and inhuman campaigns against a man, fellow Christian, pastor and bishop," the prefect of the Congregation of the Roman told "Passau Neue Presse" (Thursday). But he did not address his criticism in more detail.
In the affair of the construction of the Limburg diocesan center some individual German Bishops also distanced themselves from Tebartz van Elst. The Limburg Bishop has been given a time outside of his diocese pending to a decision of the Pope since the end of October for an indefinite time. During this time, a church commission shall review the allegations to the construction project on the Limburg Cathedral Hill. The administration of the diocese during the absence of the bishop has taken on behalf of the Holy See by Vicar General Wolfgang Rösch. Mueller also made a statement back to the Munich Cardinal Reinhard Marx, who said the prefect of the Congregation could not end the debate on the remarried divorcees. The former Bishop of Regensburg had previously stressed in an article in the Vatican newspaper "Osservatore Romano" that the discussion on re-married divorcees, must take place in accordance with the Church's teaching. However, Müller now says, "as one can easily see, we are not to speak of a termination of the discussion, but their foundations in the teaching of Christ and the Church, which are not under discussion for a plebiscite on questions of faith". The Creed was "not to be confused with a party program that can be variably developed in accordance with the wishes of the members and voters." . A "responsible pastoral" is always built "on sound doctrine".
For a presentation of the weekly newspaper "Die Zeit", in which he has been called "the most stubborn opponents" of Pope Francis, the Prefect of the Faith kept with the words: "Rational arguments do not help against bad fantasies." For considerations of the Church critic Hans Küng to the point, Müller is shining to the fact that Benedict XVI. could act as a "shadow Pope," the archbishop explained that he was "a little proud, that is still grown in pure opposition to yours truly from a bitter opponent to an ardent supporter of the Pope". Müller continues: "What a pleasure is is to see Hans Küng still rave in his old age, to be seen by the followers of Christ and visible head of the whole Church', as it says in the Second Vatican Council."
The Prefect of the Faith issued a rejection to an initiative of priests and laymen, who aim to participate in the election of the future Archbishop of Cologne. He relied in this on Pope Francis, who again and again warns against "misunderstanding the Church as if it were an organizations made by people". When ordering bishops it doesn't involved "an ideological power struggle, power distribution and power purchased by narrowed factions which destroy the unity of the Church". Although it was important "the testimony of all that a candidate is worthy," but ultimately applies that "the bishop is chosen by Christ and appointed by the Holy Spirit"
(C) 2013 Catholic News Agency KNA GmbH. All rights reserved. Trans: Tancred vekron99@hotmail.com
Link to Kath.net....
AMGD
Saturday, May 5, 2018
12,000 Euro Fine for Child Porography in the Possession of Married Deacon
The former bureau chief of the Bishop Bätzing of Limburg had child pornography images on his service computer in the bishop's palace
The permanent deacon and father of his own children had already told the "Nassauische Neue Presse", that he deeply regretted his offense and that he was undergoing therapy.
At the beginning of February 2017, the offices of the clerical employee in the bishop's palace and in the seminary had been searched, as well as his apartment.
The former office manager was the dean, he was a judge at the episcopal marriage court and training director of deacons. In addition, the 57-year-old was the president of the nationwide active consortium Permanent Diaconate, from which he resigned from office shortly after publicity of the first suspicions.
Tran: Tancred vekron99@hotmail.com
AMDG
Tuesday, November 28, 2017
The Certificate to Kill Can be Received at the Diakonie (Catholic Social Services)
Photo: Bistum Limburg
Monday, September 5, 2011
Neo-Conservative Bishop Makes Old Rite Priest Cathedral Rector
Germany, Limburg. Bishop Franz-Peter Tebartz-van Elst has named Fr. Gereon Rehberg (55) as the new Cathedral Rector in the Cathedral Chapter. This has just been reported by the Limburg Diocesan homepage. The new Cathedral Rector has been since the Feast of the Assumption also the new Cathedral Pastor. He is also the director of the Pastoral Area of Limburg. He's been celebrating the Wednesday Mass in the Old Mass for years in Wiesbaden.
Link to kreuz...
Friday, November 24, 2017
Diocese of Limburg Continues to Advertise for Murder
Picture: Detail Screenshot hochtaunus.bistumlimburg.de
Monday, April 26, 2010
The Nazis Attacked Catholic Schools As Well
The 'Völkischer Beobachter': "What sensible, responsible parents could still be accountable, who give their boys and girls over to an organization, where more than one thousand men are sex criminals?" Von Hubert Hecker
[kreuz.net] In 1937 the National Socialist Courts convicted more than 9,000 persons of homosexual offenses.
Really, Propaganda minister Joseph Goebbels (+ 1945) allotted the press these cases only in short reports -- some for the purpose of shock effect reporting especially severe punishments.
Thisis tet one other manner of proceeding against about 250 condemnations of homosexual failings in the ecclesiastical realm. The media would then broadly and maliciously portray an "animalistic bawdiness" in the clergy.
The press also attacked the Church's trust and ability to educate in trials where protected classes or minors under 21 years were concerned.
The Sexual Aberrations of the Catholic Clergy
Goebbels clearly explained these points in his notorious diatribe of 28th of May 1937 -- as always with numerous exaggerations:
The Church causes "the planned moral destruction of thousands of children and sick." and indeed, "innumerable cases of the shameless corruption of our youth."
The "sexual aberrations of the Catholic clergy" was the "physical and spiritual menace to a healthy harvest of German youth."
The NS-Paper 'Völkischer Beobachter’ [people's observer] echoed Goebel's tirades:
"What sensible, responsible parents could still be accountable, who give their boys and girls over to an organization where more than one thousand men are sex criminals?"
NS- War against Catholic Youth Organizations
The NS-attack against the moral integrity of the Catholic Education served not least of all, served to cover and conceal the degenerate sexual morality in the National Socialist youth organizations.
From the year 1936 these sexual-anarchic Organization "Jungvolk', 'Hitlerjugend' and 'Bund Deutscher Mädel' - were declared "State Youth".
With the threat of a double membership and other harassment the National Socialists attempted to pressure the Catholic youth organizations.
They were finally completely forbidden at the end of 1937.
The NS-Strike against Catholic Schools
The Goebbels' Kulturkampf drove the Church from school and home.
The National Socialists wanted to establish socialistic national schools. For that reason all Catholic public and private schools were dissolved.
Then, the NS-Authorities were left to suppress the denominational schools. In 1935 a quarter of all the Community Schools (Volksschulen) anyway, were closed.
From 1936 the Schools run by Religious Communities were generally oppressed, harrassed and punished by having their assets taken away.
The Reichsminister for Education, Bernard Rust ( + 1945), forbid all officials in 1937 to send their children to ecclesiastical private schools.
The Nazi-State drove the Catholic Sisters from Kindergarten, in order so that even the smallest could be indoctrinated in National Socialist ideology.
The Catholic must give way to the National Socialist Person
The National Socialists promoted the "Unity of education on the basis of national- socialist Community Education."
All public educational jurisdictions promote the "Unity of Education on the foundation of national-socialist Community Education."
All public educational jurisdictions like Kindergarten, 'Jungvolk and Hitlerjugend, Community School (Volkschule) and higher schools like School Home (Schulerheime)should "form the National Socialist person".
In early 1939 the National Socialialist regime in the struck the last blow against the still remaining ecclesiastical schools and institutions.
With the start of 1st February "School Homes" and Convents may only be staffed with National-Socialist direction.
For the school town Hadamar in Westerwald that meant that the closing as well of the episcopal convent and the Franciscan House of Study.
Even the state Upper School for boys in Hadamar was dissolved on the 31st of March 1939 and reestablished as a national socialist girls school in a suburb of Limburg.
Liquidation of Catholic Schools
On March 23 the Community of the Dernbacher Sisters to the foundation of the Limburg Marien School with 460 students was displaced. The school buildings were sold.
In the course of 1939 the NS-Authorities had the School of the Oblates of the Abbey of Marienstatt closed.
Then it struck the Oberschule (Finishing School) of the English Lady in Wiesbaden and a Middle School of the Dernbacher Sisters in Oberlahnstein.
The renowned Oberschule of the Ursulines in Frankfurt Geisenheim and Koenigstein were only operating until Easter of 1940.
The Bishop trusted Talk
Bishop Antonius Hilfrich († 1947) of Limburg spoke on St. George's feast-day, 23 April 1939, at the Cross Celebration of Limburger Cathedral about the school closing and theft of Church property.
About 3,000 young men were present, who supported the bishop with high spirited interjections.
The NS-public prosecutor's office reacted immediately with a preliminary investigation against the Bishop.
Link to original...
Thursday, December 24, 2015
Broadcaster: Archbishop Gänswein Suggests Resignation of the Cathedral Chapter of Limburg
Frankfurt (kath.net/KNA) The German curial Archbishop Georg Gänswein is suggesting the resignation of the Limburg cathedral chapter, according to Hessischer Rundfunk (hr). As the station announced on Tuesday, Gänswein responded in a radio interview on the question whether the chapter should resign as a consequence of the financial affair of the Limburger bishop's residence and the local cathedral chapter: "You could say yes to that of the gentlemen of the chapter ." On inquiry, the prefect of the Papal Household and private secretary of Pope Emeritus Benedict XVI.according to HR, agreed with this request for resignation.
As was said, Gänswein stressed: "Whoever has responsibility and makes mistakes, should also take the appropriate action." The first part of the discussionn is in the show "Horizont" on the HR television on 25 December at 10:10, the second part on 26 December at 10 o'clock.
When asked why he had defended the former Limburger bishop Franz-Peter Tebartz-van Elst for a long time, Gänswein told HR he had done so out of the clear sense that Tebartz had been treated unjustly.
Tebartz-van Elst had offered the Pope his resignation as bishop in October 2013. Five months later, the Pope accepted his resignation. In addition what was a perceived by many as an authoritarian administration, a wave of indignation over the construction costs of the episcopal residence on the Limburger Cathedral Hill in the amount of approximately EUR 31 million and the [alleged] concealment of these costs had contributed decisively to the resignation. (C) 2015
CBA Catholic News Agency. All rights reserved. Photo (c) kath.net/Petra Lorleberg
Link to Kath.net
Trans: Tancred vekron99@hotmail.com
AMDG
Sunday, March 2, 2014
Newspaper: Limburger Bishop Not Criminally Guilty
The report has been in the possession of the Chairman of the Bishops' Conference, Archbishop Robert Zollitsch, since Friday. He will now study it intensively and consult with Rome, Zollitsch said. He denies that a decision will be reach decision Rome even before the start of the Spring Plenary Assembly of the Bishops' Conference on 10 March in the matter of Limburg bishop.
According to "Welt am Sonntag", the report has no reviews according to several authors, but consists only of facts and the representation of processes. There had been no disagreement among the examiners. "The factual arguments speak for Tebartz van Elst, but not for the chapter that is partially responsible," the paper said quoting its sources.
In the "Welt am Sonntag" Hesse Ex-Minister of State Jochen Riebel (CDU), a member of the finance committee of the Episcopal See in Limburg, has leveled new allegations against the bishop. He claimed to have been lied to by Tebartz van Elst as to the question of how many antique and artistic figures had been purchased for the diocesan center. "Tebartz van Elst has promised me in a confidential meeting high and swore that all the figures that are placed there, came from the pool. That was a lie," the paper quoted Riebel. "Only two of the figures are from the collection, all others were purchased."
Copyright 2014 Catholic News Agency, Vienna, Austria (www.kathpress.at) All rights reserved.
Thursday, March 6, 2014
"With Love" From Freiburg -- Zollitsch Attacks Müller!
Zollitsch criticized the German Cardinal Gerhard Ludwig Müller. Accoding to the Assessment, The Report Showed no Wrongdoing by Tebartz van Elst. Zollitsch expressed this: "It amazes me that the old saying of Wittgenstein, 'Whereof one can not speak, thereof one should remain silent' is ignored." On the question of the influence he had on the decision on Tebartz, Zollitsch said: "The Holy Father knows my opinion. I have full confidence in him that he will make the right decision. "Zollitsch had handed over the report on Carnival Monday on the controversial construction projects in the diocese of Limburg to the Prefect of the Congregation of Bishops in the Vatican, Cardinal Marc Ouellet.
Wednesday, February 16, 2022
Cardinal Duka Calls out Evil Cardinal Marx
Cardinal Dominik Duka accuses Cardinal Marx of apparently defaming Pope Benedict XVI..
(Munich/Prague) The Czech bishops are jumping to Benedict XVI's side to protect him because the German bishops are obviously unable or unwilling to do so. Cardinal Dominik Duka, Archbishop of Prague, defends Benedict XVI. in an open letter against the dirt bucket campaign that is underway in Germany against the former head of the Church. At the same time, he accuses Cardinal Reinhard Marx, the incumbent Archbishop of Munich and Freising, "of having defamed and tarnished his reputation".
The heckling from Prague shook the bishop's palaces in Munich and Limburg like thunder. Cardinal Duka, the primate of Bohemia, reads his German brothers the riot act in an open letter. Even more: He practices devastating criticism of one of the most powerful bishops in Europe.
The report with which Benedict XVI. is "unjustly slandered and hurt," as far as is now clear, is not worth the paper it is printed on. This report "probably cost hundreds of thousands of euros," said Cardinal Duka. The words weigh as heavy as lead: The Czech cardinal says frankly that apparently a lot of money was paid to drag Benedict XVI. through the dirt.
Cardinal Duka, persecuted by the Communists, knows how directed discrediting campaigns work. The Munich lawyers who prepared the report were unfair to Benedict XVI. because, as the cardinal implies, they apparently already had the intention of pillorying the former pope. The motivation remains unclear for the time being. Cardinal Duka ignores it. Do the lawyers just want to attract attention in a cheap way, make themselves important? One thing is certain, according to Duka: "No evidence" was presented, only an "opinion" was given.
The canon lawyer Stefan Mückl, who in the course of the dirt bucket campaign against Benedict XVI. explored the allegations made in detail, meanwhile, came to a clear conclusion: More than 40 years ago, the then-Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, Archbishop of Munich and Freising, had "no knowledge of the criminal acts of these priests", contrary to the assumption in the Munich report.
Specifically, there are four cases. The report scandalized the fact that the archbishop at the time knew about the cases but did nothing to counteract them. "But it's not true. He didn't know what these priests did," said Mückl after studying the files.
Monsignor Bätzing, Bishop of Limburg and President of the German Bishops' Conference, plays an opaque role in the matter. In any case, he did nothing to improve and defend the reputation of Benedict XVI. On the contrary, after the publication of the dubious allegations by the Munich report, he was ready to join the chorus of critics of Benedict. Cardinal Duka does not mention Bätzing by name, but the head of the German bishops is also washed with it.
Far more serious is the accusation that Cardinal Duka makes against Cardinal Marx. Marx, former President of the German Bishops' Conference and representative of Europe in the Council of Cardinals, which advises Pope Francis in the governance of the universal Church, was guilty of "defamation", the defamation of his predecessor as Archbishop of Munich and Freising and later Pope Benedict XVI.
Cardinal Marx, who has twice offered his resignation to Pope Francis in connection with the cases of sexual abuse by clerics, albeit only pro forma, is standing in front of a pile of rubble. Cardinal Duka's accusation weighs heavily: the Archbishop of Prague says that Cardinal Marx has lost his credibility.
It really is time for Marx to resign.
Text: Giuseppe Nardi
Image : Wikicommons
Trans: Tancred vekron99@hotmail.com
AMDG
Monday, January 20, 2014
Gänswein: Commission Will Exonerate Tebartz-van Elst
Prefect of the Papal Household, "I do believe that the investigation will clear up allegations of wasting money, non-communication and skipping of controlling bodies in favor of the bishop" - Cardinal Lehmann: "media campaign."
Regensburg (kath.net / KNA) The Prefect of the Papal Household, Archbishop George Gänswein (photo), expects the exoneration of Limburg's Bishop Franz-Peter Tebartz van Elst by the Episcopal Conference Commission. "I do believe that the investigation will clear up allegations of a waste of money, non-communication and skipping of controlling bodies in favor of the bishop," Gänswein said in an interview with the online edition of the "Mittelbayerischen Zeitung" in Regensburg.
The result must then be submitted to the Congregation for Bishops in Rome, continued the private secretary of Benedict XVI. "Only then, and after careful consideration, the Holy Father will himself make the decision."
Gänswein took part on Sunday in the celebration of the 90th birthday of Georg Ratzinger in Regensburg, representing the emeritus pope. "For him, it was comforting that I have come to his side. But it is also naturally a bit difficult for him." Benedict XVI. will no longer journey to Regensburg, not even secretly, says Gänswein. "After so many years of experience, I think that's impossible."
Georg Ratzinger turned 90 years old on 15 January. Today he celebrated Mass along with his brother in Rome, who is four years younger. On Sunday in Regensburg, a Pontifical Mass in his honor was held in the cathedral. There, the Cathedral Choir led by the former Director of Music for one of his own compositions on the Mass "L'Anno Santo". On Saturday they had surprised the former Director of Music with a serenade outside his home. Georg Ratzinger headed the world-famous choir from 1964 to 1994.
Cardinal Lehmann took a position in the CBA interview about Tebartz van Elst and replied that after a visit with Pope Francis, the matter should be made clear as soon as possible, so that it should not endanger the Church's spirit of optimism. Because the process fosters mistrust and a hostile sentiment against the Church.
"I told him that I think the Limburg Bishop is a very intelligent, well educated, communicative and polite man, of whom I have never experienced anything of wasteful swank," said Lehmann as to his view of the Pope's audience, however, a certain policy of secrecy is said to have burdened the process, and. «a media campaign has stoked it." 90th birthday of Monsignor Georg Ratzinger - With Curia Archbishop Georg Gänswein and Bishop Rudolf Voderholzer - Celebration in Regensburg Pontifical Mass in Regensburg Cathedral in honor of Domkapellmeister em.
Georg Ratzinger (C) 2013 Catholic News Agency KNA GmbH. All rights reserved. Archbishop Gänswein Photo (c) Paul Badde
Monday, November 26, 2012
More News Stories -- Resistance Against French President -- Underground Bishop Dies
France. Two thousand French mayors are asking of French President, Comrade Francoise Hollande, that no homosexual marriages are to be conducted. On Wednesday, the speaker of the Socialist government, that no mayor will be able to fall back on his conscience.
Limburg: Diocesan Speaker Leaves After Three Months
Germany. Eva Demmerle (45) is resigning from her post as Press Speaker of the Diocese of Limburg after only three months for family reasons. This was reported by the site 'mittelhessen.de'. Frau Demmerele made her decision while on vacation. She was the Press Speaker of the Emperor's eldest son Otto von Habsburg (+ 2011).
Underground Bishop Has Died
On November 6th the Chinese Underground Bishop Samuel Guo Chaunzhen (94) died. This was reported by Vatican newspaper 'L'Osservatore Romano' recently. The deceased began in 1944 with his priestly ordination. After the Cultural Revolution he spent sixteen long years in a work camp and under house arrest. In 1963 the Communists forced him to work in the food industry, so that he could not be active as a priest. Then 19 years later he could work as a pastor. In 1983 he founded a Seminary in eastern China. In 1988 he was named by John Paul II as the Auxiliary Bishop of the Archdiocese of Jinan.
Hate as an Answer to Truth
Germany. On Monday the famous Cologne Capuchin, Father Paul Terwitte, in the broadcast 'Hart aber fair" in the forced church tax broadcaster 'ARD' about euthanasia. In the broadcast Witwer introduced a lady who had been euthanized by a Death Doctor. The priest asked the husband: "Why should your wife conduct her suicide with the help of a doctor? Why didn't you find a razor with which she could have cut an artery?" Already during the broadcast, there was a hate campaign against the critics of euthanasia. On Wednesday the intimidated priest apologized on 'twitter.com'. In a forced church-tax broadcaster he should have asked "more sensitive questions". He still remains, however, an opponent of euthanasia.
Insurance Fund Pays for the Killing of their Customers
Holland. The Netherlands introduces euthanasia on a health insurance certificate. The Insurance Fund 'Menzis' has already been working since March together with mobile death teams. The governing body of the Insurer openly lets its members offer euthanasia.
Link to kreuz.net....
Wednesday, October 5, 2022
Vote For Aberrosexuality, Or Else — Minority of German Bishops Support Catholic Moral Teaching
Prof. Werner Münch, former Prime Minister: "It's enough now, Bishop Bätzing!"
"Bätzing seems to be completely indifferent to a split in the Catholic Church, which has meanwhile also long since occurred." Guest commentary by Werner Münch
Bonn (kath.net) Not long ago, numerous believers breathed a sigh of relief when Cardinal Marx announced that he would resign as chairman of the DBK and thus also out of the synodal path. Many members of the committees in which they had anything to do with him were relieved, because too often they had to endure the exaggerated, often angry and uncontrolled outbursts of their chairman.
A media wave of praise and sympathy preceded Bishop Georg Bätzing of Limburg, who was appointed to succeed Cardinal Marx for both offices. His leadership qualities have been described as engaging, forgiving, and balancing. If we use this as a benchmark for his previous term in office and judge it critically, then we must come to the conclusion that we have heard fairy tales. Bätzing works like a political functionary, and it is no coincidence that the people who work with him compare his methods to "disciplinarian Herbert Wehner". He is convinced of himself, resistant to advice and unteachable. When it comes to his ideas for realizing the "right" goals of the synodal path, even Pope Francis is not taken seriously. When in his letter to the "pilgrim people of God in Germany" he called for a new evangelization as the main goal of the synodal path, he received the cynical answer from Bätzing that that was exactly the program of the synodal path, which, like everything else, which as everyone knows, isn’t true. As proof: When Bishop Voderholzer and a few other bishops made a motion at the 1st Synodal Assembly to set up such a forum, this request was rejected. Bätzing seems completely indifferent to a split in the Catholic Church, which has long since happened.
Other examples that prove that he lacks any form of self-criticism should be mentioned without claiming to be complete:
1. Bätzing tried several times publicly, to accuse Pope em. Benedict XVI of lying - even after his employees had long confessed that they had made a mistake in one point of Benedict’s research and that Benedict had publicly apologized for it. The aim of this attack by Bätzing was to prove that Benedict was partly to blame for the failure to deal with the abuse when he was bishop in Munich, which failed miserably.
2. Bätzing gave free rein to his impatience in the case of Cardinal Woelki, whom he regarded as his determined opponent in the synodal path, by publicly urging the pope several times to make a decision about Woelki, i.e. finally him as a cardinal from Cologne recall. He didn't seem to notice that this request was becoming more and more embarrassing for Bätzing, or he didn't want to.
3. It may be that Curial Cardinal Kurt Koch did not express himself clearly in his comparative presentation of positions from the Nazi era and the contents of the synodal path. But is it fraternal coexistence among shepherds that Bätzing immediately demanded a public apology from Koch, and if this was not done "immediately" then he would immediately "lodge an official complaint to the Pope"? Can't one first try to solve this in a more discreet way, as would be more appropriate to the offices of 2 Catholic pastors?
4. When foreign bishops (from Poland, Scandinavia, USA, Canada, Australia, Japan and other Asian countries to highly recognized representatives of the Benedictine monastery in Heiligenkreuz in Austria) competently and critically deal with the content of the synodal path in Germany, is it the right way to brush them off according to the motto: It's a pity that you don't understand what it's all about?! Such a reaction speaks of arrogance and hubris. Perhaps it is therefore good that, according to a recent survey, 72% of those questioned answered that the name Georg Bätzing was unknown to them.
5. In the 4th Synodal Assembly from 8th to 10th October, the text on the liberalization of Catholic sexual morals was rejected in certain votes due to the 1/3 blocking minority of the bishops specified in the statute. Participants reported that they were under pressure even before the vote (one participant said: “I've been scared for months”). After the vote, the bishops who had not agreed to the proposed text were summoned behind closed doors. In the plenum there was “head washing, victor's fists, reproaches, protest posters, nervous breakdowns and insults such as treason! snipers! Cowardice! Laziness" (see "Die Tagespost", September 15, 2022). After the rejection of this text, which broke with the previously valid sexual morality of Church teaching, Bishop Bätzing defiantly announced that he would nevertheless implement the rejected paper in his diocese in Limburg and also present it in Rome.
And from now on the screws were tightened: A request for a secret vote, which must be submitted by at least 5 members, was also submitted in the assembly, but was rejected after a vote with a large majority, although a vote on a request of this kind is expressly not intended. Now the deviants (“traitors”) could finally be arrested immediately.
Now we wait and see how courageously the pope will deal with the episcopal heretics. The German bishops' ad limina visit in November is a good opportunity for him to take a clear position.
Robert Cardinal Sarah bitterly said the following after this synodal assembly: “What is happening in Germany is terrible. One has the impression that the truths of faith and the commandments of the Gospel are put to the vote. By what right can we decide to renounce part of the teaching of Christ?” (quoted in: “Die Tagespost”, September 15, 2022).
Summary:
The result of Georg Bätzing's administration is devastating. His management style is extremely authoritarian because he doesn't leave the slightest room for dissenting opinions. It is not certain how much longer the bishops, priests and laity will put up with this. However, demands from the laity for corrections towards a synodal cooperation are hardly to be expected, because they were selected according to the principle of guaranteeing a "secular majority". If now, after the end of the synodal path next spring, the already elected "synodal councils" monitor and demand the implementation of the resolutions of the synodal assemblies - one is still pending - the Catholic Christian in Germany experiences a heterogeneous diocesan landscape in which he can can no longer find some in his beliefs. We have fallen into a terrible trap because Bishop Bätzing and his friends drove the Catholic Church in Germany to a wall.
Prof. Dr. Werner Münch, is Prime Minister a. D., and member of the Board of Trustees "Joy in Faith"
Archive photo Prof. Münch (c) Werner Münch
Trans: Tancred vekron99@hotmail.Com
AMDG
Thursday, December 12, 2013
Preliminary Result of Papal Reconstruction of the Curia -- Nine Members of the Congregation for Education Dismissed
Personnel Decisions of the Pope
Confirmations, Layoffs, Promotions
Differentiated Intervention in Congregation of Education
The Newly Appointed Members: Cardinal Koch
The Confirmed Members: Cardinal Schönborn and Cardinal Marx
The Dismissed Members: Cardinal Woelki
Campaign against Cardinal Burke: "Too Conservative and Traditionalist"
image: Settimo Cielo
Tuesday, June 21, 2011
Bishop Heinrich a Favorite for Berlin's Archbishop
Germany. The new Archbishop of Berlin will be decided by 30 June. This was according to the news service 'dpa'. The 'Passauer Neue Presse' says that Bischof Gerhard Ludwig Müller von Regensburg has only been discussed a brief time for the office. Of the actual propsed three are Auxiliary Bishop Matthias Heinrich von Berlin, Archbishop Ludwig Schick von Bamberg and Bishop Franz-Peter Tebartz-von Elst von Limburg. The newspaper has chosen Auxilliary Bishop Heinrich as favorite.
http://www.kreuz.net/article.13395.html
Wednesday, May 28, 2014
Bishop Voderholzer Will Be Assigned to the CDF
Some may recall that His Lordship said Mass in St. Peter’s with unjustly disgraced Bishops Walter Mixa of Augsburg and Franz-Peter Tebartz-van Elst of Limburg.
He received his episcopal consecration from the hands of the Old Liberal Cardinal Marx.
Thursday, May 14, 2020
Princess Gloria Thurn u. Taxis Tells of the Bishops: "Who No Longer Seem to Believe in the Sacrificial Meal."
"You can really get the impression, where here there are state officials who act brazenly and submissively, of those who no longer seem to believe in the sacrificial meal."
"The President of the Episcopal Conference is by no means the chief, but at best a kind of moderator."
"One often gets the impression that the bishop's collective with a large or very large president suffocates the authority of the individual local bishop."
"These are facts that, under the pretext of the Covid 19 epidemic, in many cases inalienable rights of citizens have been violated and their fundamental freedoms have been disproportionately and unjustifiably restricted, including the right to freedom of religion, expression and freedom of movement."
"To denigrate any counter-opinion as right-wing populism is enormously damaging here."
Nardi Picture: The World (Screenshot)