Wednesday, February 24, 2021

The Freemasonic Europa Movement


 The Freemasons strive to overcome the European nation-states as a stage towards a world republic, the world-unit state.

By P. Paolo M. Siano *


Professor Gianmario Cazzaniga, a scholar esteemed by the Grand Orient of Italy, explains how the idea of a World Republic between the 17th and 18th centuries was prepared by a Republic of Scholars and Scientists, that is, by a cultural network of writers, nobles Writers, publishers, antiquarians and scholars, which was promoted by Huguenot circles, by Protestant (but not only) financial sectors in Geneva, Amsterdam and London, and from 1717 by the Masonic lodges. 1


The French scholar Yves Hivert-Messeca also affirmed that the Freemasons in the 18th century dreamt of a supranational and interdenominational society / fraternity, that is, of a new Europe.

 2

It is logical to deduce that the realization of a European Republic or World Republic according to Masonic principles, as a project or at least implied the hope of a socio-cultural transformation (according to the Masonic principles of secularism and anti-dogmatism) and / or the revolution and the political-military overthrow of denominational Catholic monarchies (for example the Habsburgs) and the then the Papal States.


In 1868, the first edition of the newspaper Les Etats-Unis d'Euro-pe printed [The United States of Europe], an organ of the International League for Peace and Freedom, based in Bern (Switzerland), and offices in France, Belgium, Italy, Germany and England. In the first edition of January 5, 1868 it is announced that the Freemason Giuseppe Garibaldi is its honorary President (p. 1). Freemasonry is praised in number 47 of November 22, 1868 (p. 187f).


In 1889, Austrian Catholics at Catholic Day meeting in Vienna, accused Freemasons of desiring the destruction of the Catholic Austria: Delenda est Austria . 3


From August 31 to September 2, 1900, an international congress of Masons will take place in Paris under the auspices of the Greater Orient of France ( GOdF). The Grand Master of the Swiss Grand Lodge Alpina, Edouard Quartier-la-Tente (1855 - 1925), expressed the hope for a coalition of all worldwide Masonic powers to realize the Masonic ideals and the world-re-pu-Republic to set up: " Pour la fondation de la République Universelle." 4


The Grand Master of the Greater Orient of France, Louis Lucipia (1843–1904), praised the French Revolution, criticized clericalism and the Catholic “theocracy” (p. 73f). Various Freemasons reaffirm the demand at this congress: “ Vive la République universelle! "(P. 124, 128, 134, 156 - 160).

In 1902, about sixteen years before the fall of the Habsburg Empire, the Rivista della Massoneria Italiana of the Grand Orient of Italy published the article by the Italian Freemason Emilio Bossi (1870 - 1920 ), who wrote the following from Lugano (Switzerland):


"It is Freemasonry, which should allow the international arbitration incurred in preparation for future federation of the United States of Europe, which is the prelude to the United States in the world." 5 


From July 3rd to the 5th, 1909, a meeting of French and German Freemasons took place in Baden-Baden. The high dignitaries of the Grand Orient of France, Charles Bernardin, offered a toast to the United States of Europe from ( "Etats Unis d'Europe") and Freemasonry. 6

Journal of the International League for Peace and Freedom, 1868

The Hungarian Jewish historian François Fejtö (1909 - 2008) explained that the Freemasons project of the 18th and 19th century, claimed that the United States of Euro-pa and the World Republic implied the destruction of the Catholic Habsburg Monarchy and that Freemasons and Freemasons estates, especially the Grand Orient of France, played a major role in this. 7th


Indeed, with the end of this empire, Freemasonry could return to Austrian soil and especially to Vienna. In 1918 the Grand Lodge of Vienna is founded. In 1922 Richard Nikolaus Graf Coudenhove-Kalergi (1894 - 1972) was initiated into the Vienna Lodge Humanitas, then he was initiated into the "Mozart Chapter" of the 18th degree - Knight of the Rose Cross of the Old and Accepted Scottish Rite. Kalergi founded the Pan Europa Bewegung that is supported from the outset by the Grand Lodge of Vienna. 8th

In the book Practical Idealism. Adel - Technik Pacifismus (Pan-Europa Verlag, Vienna-Leipzig 1925) the Masonic Kalergi identifies the European spirit as equal with Lucifer-Prometheus, the bearer of light:

"In Jewish mythology, the European spirit corresponds to Lucifer, in Greek to Prometheus, the lightbringer who carries the divine spark to earth, [...] the father of battle, technology, enlightenment and progress [...]", p. 83.

 According to Kalergi the "spirit of Europe" has broken political despotism, and only with its emancipation from Christianity does Europe find itself (see page 83. - 85).

Also in the second half of the 20th century the "United States of Europe" 9 and the "United Europe" 10  were hailed in circles of the Grand Orient of Italy and in its Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite, as can be seen, for example, can be read in the monthly magazine for Masonic and profane culture L'Incontro delle genti, which had been led since 1960 by the Masonic Elvio Sciubba 33 ° (1915-2001). In a book from 2010, the Freemasons Alain Bauer (former Grand Master of the Grand Orient of France) and Jean-Claude Rochigneux (former Council of the Grand Orient of France) quotes the Contrat Maçonnique Européen (European Masonic Treaty) of the Greater Orient of France (Strasbourg, June 5, 1993), which among other things affirms:


  • Freemasonry defends secularism [= secularism], hence the separation of church and state, because only secularism defends absolute freedom of conscience and religion;

  • Freemasonry bears the European idea incorporated into universalism;
  • Freemasonry wants a Masonic Europe ("Europe maçonnique") that contributes to the construction of a cultural Europe. 11

Masonic Europe ("l'Europe maçonnique"), represented by the Grand Orient of France, consists both in the Union of European Freemasonry and in a Europe that is culturally, politically and socially based on the principles of Freemasonry, including secularism is (p.70 - 76)), means what secularism, i.e. the exclusion of any influence of the Catholic Church from society.


In Brussels, on October 15, 2010 and November 30, 2011, the delegations of various European Freemasonries (including the Greater Orient of Italy and the United Grand Lodges of Germany) met with their respective Grand Masters and representatives of liberal and humanist associations with the heads of the European Union ( with the Presidents of the European Commission, the European Parliament and the European Council). They should agree on a common plan to promote “democratic” and “libertarian” ideals. 12


On March 2, 2012, the then Vice-President of the European Parliament visited the headquarters of the Grand Orient of Italy and endorsed the Masonic commitment to secularism. 13


In April 2011, the center-right majority in the Hungarian parliament (262 votes in favor against 44 against) approved a constitution that came into force in early 2012 and is based on God, speaking of Christian roots and the traditional family (by a union of a man and woman). The Hungarian constitution also restricts the powers of the banks, defends the right to life of the unborn and does not recognize the “right” to abortion or homosexual relations. The European Union (EU) responded by, among other things, defending the absolute independence of the banks (ECB and IMF) and threatening economic sanctions. The British BBC also criticized Orbán's conservative “drifting away”.


Even today, proponents of what the Masonic Kalergi called “The Spirit of Europe” try to restrict the sovereignty of European states by imposing certain policies on them, for example with regard to homosexuality / gender and abortion, which are incompatible with the Christian roots, the real roots, of real Europe.


Father Paolo Maria Sia-no  belongs to the order of the Franciscans of the Immaculata (FFI); The Church historian with a doctorate is considered one of the best Catholic experts on Freemasonry, to which he has dedicated several standard works and numerous essays.


Translation: Giuseppe di Nar-
image: Corrispondenza Romana

Trans: Tancred vekron99@hotmail.com


  1. 1, Compare Gianmario Cazzaniga: Massoneria e Letteratura. Dalla République des Lettres alla letteratura Nazio-na-le (Freemasonry and literature from the République des Lettres for national literature.), In: GM Cazzaniga - G. Tocchini - R. Turchi, Le Muse in loggia. Massoneria e letteratura nel set-te-cen-to (Freemasonry and literature in the 18th century), Unicopli Edizioni, Milan 2002, pp 11-32).

  2. 2. See L'Europe sous l'Acacia. Histoire des Francs-maçonneries européennes du XVIIIe siècle à nos jours (Europe under the acacia. History of European Freemasonry from the 18th century to the present day). Volume 1: Le XVIIIe siècle. L'âge d'or de la franc-maçonnerie en Europe. Le temps des Lumières et des Obscurités. Le rêve universel de fraternité et les limites de l'autre (The 18th Century. The Golden Age of Freemasonry in Europe. The Age of Enlightenment and Darkness. The Universal Dream of Fraternity and the Limits of Each Other), Editions Dervy, Paris 2012 , P. 305.

  3. 3. See G. Kuéss - B. Scheichelbauer: 200 years of Freemasonry in Austria. The 175th birthday of the United Lodge, Verlag O. Kerry, Vienna 1959, p 152f).

  4. 4, Grand Orient de France - Supreme Conseil pour la France et les Possessions françaises, Congrès Maç. ·. International , Compte rendu of séances du congrès, le 31 Aout, 1er, 2 Septembre 1900 Secrétariat Général du Grand Orient de France Paris 1901, p 38f.

  5. 5. E. Bossi: Qual è la missione essenziale della Massoneria nell'epoca attuale? (What is the essential mission of Freemasonry in this day and age?), In: Rivista della Massoneria Italiana ., # 13 - 15, July 15 - August 15, 1902, Rome, p.232.

  6. 6. See Brüd . ·. Meeting on July 3rd - 5th in Baden-Baden - Reunion des Francs-Maçons 3 - 5 Juillet à Baden-Baden 1909 , p. 18.

  7. 7. See François Fejtö: Requiem pour un empire défunt: Histoire de la destruction de l'Autriche-Hon-grie , Lieu Commun, Paris, 1989, page 309 - 313 337 - 349, dt output. Requiem for a monarchy. The smashing of Austria-Hungary , Bundesverlag, Vienna 1991.

  8. 8. See E. Semrau: enlightenment and United dung-ble- Studien Verlag, Innsbruck 2012, p.95.

  9. 9. See Albert Tura: Europa divisa ( Divided Europe), in: L' Incontro delle genti, Mensile di attualità e cultura, Anno XV, No. 7–8 (July – August 1975), Rome, pp. 8f.

  10. 10. See Un'Europa di Garibaldi (A Europe of Garibaldi), in: L'Incontro delle gen-ti April-June 1979 Rome, P. 11, see also Elvio Sciubba. L'E-co , in: L'Incontro delle gen-ti , July – September 1979, Rome, p. 1.

  11. 11. See A. Bauer - J.-C. Rochigneux: Les relations internationales de la franc-maçonnerie fran-Cai-se (International Relations of the French Freemasonry, Armand Colin, Paris 2010) pp 50-53.

  12. 12. Cf. Antonio Panaino: La Massoneria protagonista della vita sociale e morale dell'Europa (Freemasonry as protagonist of the social and moral life of Europe), in: Erasmo notizie, Bulletin of the Greater Orient of Italy, No. 18, October 30, 2010, Rome , P. 1f; see also Erasmo notizie, No. 20, November 30, 2011, pp. 1–5.

  13. 13. See. Il vice presidente del Parlamento europeo Pittella in visita al Grande Ori-en-te (the European Parliament Pittella Vice-President on a visit to the Grand Orient), in: zie noti-Erasmus , No. 4-5, 15 March 2012, p. 6.


AMDG

Monday, February 22, 2021

Bawdy Irish Priest is a Triple Threat

Edit: a triple threat to Faith, Hope and Charity. I thought the fictional Father Jack was bad, but this priest is laughably indecent. This sort of thing is an abominable mockery to the priesthood.  There's a similar, more recent video of this bawd here at TIA

Events like this are conceived to demoralize you. Don't let it. Ignore your Bishop's annual appeal and send the money to a more worthy and pious effort. 

 

AMDG

Thursday, February 18, 2021

“Monsignor” Craig Harrison Resigns Priesthood

 Edit: wow, if only they could get rid of more narcissistic flamers like this. 

Tbh, he sounds like the kind of person who doesn’t belong in the priesthood in the first place.

Stephen Brady had this cancer in his sights

BAKERSFIELD, Calif. (KERO) — Lawyers representing Monsignor Craig Harrison said he has tendered letters of resignation as the Pastor of St. Francis Parish and from his obligations as a Catholic priest.


According to a release from the Law Offices of Kyle J. Humphrey, Msgr. Harrison will address his resignation at 12:10 p.m. Thursday.


Allegations against Harrison were investigated in Kern County, Merced County and Fresno County. No authorities have moved to file charges against the monsignor.

AMDG

Monday, February 15, 2021

A Shameful Attack Against the Bacon Priest


Father Werenfried van Straaten in a picture of the aid organization he founded, Church in Need, where a pathetic "purge" of its founder is currently in progress.

Notes by Giuseppe Nardi


The steamroller is once again being driven around in the German Church. That's not new. The stage directions are known, hence who is steering the steamroller and against whom it is directed. And the result is also foreseeable. The victims are currently a cardinal and a long dead man who can no longer defend himself. How convenient.


In a decades proven alliance between left main-stream media, and progressive Church circles are conquering and defending positions of power. Bit by bit, the axis in the Church in Germany has been shifted to the left over the past 60 years. Every successful operation does not mean saturation, but only an intermediate stage to the next operation. What personalities and institutions stand in the way of “another” Church are dismantled. Labels are awarded for this so that the non-church allies always and immediately know who is friend and who is enemy.


The first labels were for the so-called “pre-Conciliarists” including the variants “backward-looking”, “the day before yesterday” and “archconservative”. The latter title became a "long runner". It is suitable to this day. The Mainstream, so far removed from any understanding of the Church, that not the slightest chance exists for more than merely a minimal understanding, means that any Church representative, who isn't stamped with the "seal of approval:" progressive,  leftliberal or modern, is considered "arch-conservative." But that is only one of several practiced assasin vocabularies.


As early as the 1960s it became clear that the interplay between inner-Church circles and non-church media results in an efficient alliance that benefits both sides to achieve a shift in power in the Church for one and the enjoyment of Church dismantling for the other.


Many well-known and less well-known Church representatives have since fallen victim to this unholy alliance. When they licked blood in the 1990s and realized that they could even “shoot” bishops, things really got going. Since then, one campaign has followed the next, always with the same pattern, always with a shameful pretext, always with the same hunting party, always with a prominent victim, always with another axis shift to the left. The trophies include prominent names such as Archbishop Haas, Bishop Mixa, Bishop Krenn and, with Archbishop Groer, even a cardinal. One to one was implemented in the Church area, which was also the case in the political area. The most recent example of this alliance is the presidential election campaign in the USA. With the election of Pope Francis, the unholy alliance has moved into the highest position.


According to the Maoist principle, one opponent must be beaten by way of example in order to intimidate a hundred opponents. Every successful persecution in the past decades has meant a growing intimidation of conservative Church circles, even greater reluctance, and even more abstinence from the public. It also meant that the criteria for the selection of future bishops were constantly being scaled back and adjusted. The dominant image was that of docile submission in the hope of appeasing the hounds. Nothing of the sort happened, as was foreseeable, which frightened conservative Church leaders even more and made the superiors, who openly or surreptitiously sympathize with the left, ever bolder. 


So bastion after bastion was lost. Anyone who looks at the Church in the German-speaking area today can no longer imagine a situation that still prevailed in the 1950s. Most bishops may be pious men, at least this is what the believing heart hopes, but with only a few exceptions they are characterized by two aspects: They are latently, even if gradually graduated, positioned progressively. And the less progressive they are, the less leadership they show. 


In the past 60 years, the Church was dismantled not from below, but from above. It is also not conceivable otherwise in a hierarchically constituted, divine foundation.


Hunt for Cardinal Woelki - the hunters are called Marx and Bätzing

 

The most recent prey selected by the hunting party is the Archbishop of Cologne, Rainer Maria Cardinal Woelki, and the "Bacon Priest" Werenfried van Straaten. Cardinal Woelki does not necessarily belong to the type of bishop and prince of the Church who should go down in history. His unforgivable flaw is that he is more conservative than the left-wing majority of the German Bishops' Conference. His institutional position as Archbishop of Cologne and Cardinal of the Holy Church makes him a troublemaker among his confreres. And in 2018 he dared to turn to Rome against the impossible majority decision of the Bishops' Conference to admit Protestant spouses to Holy Communion. What under John Paul II and Benedict XVI. in extremis was able to remedy the situation, but since Pope Francis rules Rome, it became an own goal.


The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith wanted to take action, but was called back by Francis. Cardinal Woelki had exposed himself without being able to achieve anything. The small minority of bishops he heads because of his rank were counted. The DBK majority found Woelki's heckling against the "Synodal Way", with which the Church in Germany is on its way to schism, is no less disturbing. 


The reaction to this is that the majority leaders of the Bishops' Conference are working towards the transfer of the Archdiocese of Cologne, one of the largest, richest and most important in the Church along with those of Milan and Chicago, into other hands. It's all a question of power. So it is not surprising that the most dangerous headwind for Woelki does not come from any media, but from the Church itself. Nor is it surprising that Cardinal Reinhard Marx, as Archbishop of Munich and Freising, the holder of the most important bishop's seat after Cologne, and Bishop Georg Bätzing, the President of the German Bishops' Conference, put themselves in the limelight as Woelki's most vocal critics.


The excuse can always be found. That seems to be the slightest problem in a dishonorable power struggle: whether dodgy behavior by religious women in the diocese of Speyer, or whether dealing with a clerical abuser in Cologne. But anyone who assumes that one or the other case is actually at issue is vastly wrong. It's about a power struggle within the church that is supposed to bring Woelki to his knees, ideally even to steal the Archdiocese of Cologne from him.


The second hunt illustrates this striving for power even more clearly, because the "prey" is long dead. Buckets of dirt are pelted at an outstanding, but long-dead personality. It is a kind of monument fall that has been in vogue on the left not only since the racist machinations of organizations like Black Lives Matter.


The Bacon Priest - a fighter who suffered less and less after 1968


The Dutch Premonstratensian Werenfried van Straaten, canon in the Flemish Abbey of Tongerlo, was one of the real greats of the post-war Church. When Germany was the war on the ground, he did something that probably today by definition would already regarded as shameful and intolerable. He began to help the defeated Germans who had been displaced and made homeless in the millions. This resulted in the Ostpriesthilfe because Father Werenfried initially helped the Catholic priests from the eastern German regions and linguistic islands, who were stranded as displaced persons in the western Allied occupation zones. Over time it became an international aid organization for the persecuted Christians behind the Iron Curtain, and later worldwide. In 1953 he also founded the Bauorden, in which young adults could help with social and non-profit building projects. The first projects were homes for German displaced persons.

Wherever Father Werenfried preached, he filled the churches in the 1950s and 1960s. For an extensive media apostolate he used the most modern means available. Above all, however, he was not a man of low tones. When in the course of the Second Vatican Council the wind shifted in the Church, which also hit him. His adherence to ecclesiastical social and moral doctrine and his understanding of the Church made him as a “conservative” more and more an undesirable person. This development within the Church coincided with the overall development, as the political left seemed to be spurred on by an apparently unstoppable rise in the 1970s. The Bacon Priest was denounced an enemy, as it states in the anticlerical communist East block and the local Catholic underground Church, but it also supported the persecuted Orthodox Church. Communist groups in West Germany controlled by the KGB and MfS from Moscow and East Berlin targeted Father Werenfried.


His main problem, however, was that he was no longer suffered within the Church in the 1980s and was therefore increasingly left out in the rain by his own side. The division of Germany seemed irreversible to many, anti-communism only a nuisance. Eventually Father Werenfried began to be marginalized. In some dioceses he was hardly suffered any more and had to be happy if he got churches to preach there. Through his fiery words to the conscience of the people, with which he also addressed those topics that hardly anyone dared to address in the Church, such as chastity, celibacy, marriage, the right to life of unborn children, he had become an outsider.


He did not let that deter him. He had with the relief organization Church in Need, as the Ost Priesterhilfe was now called, because its area of operations had expanded, created something lasting, something that the Christians persecuted more than ever needed worldwide. When Father Werenfried - a name, a concept - died shortly after his 90th birthday in 2003, he was no longer in the middle of the Church where he had started, but rather on the edge. Not because he had changed, but because the leading Church districts had changed.


He was lucky to have found a capable successor in his niece Antonia Willemsen, who continued his legacy with the help of capable employees. In doing so, they understood this inheritance in full in the sense of the Bacon Priest only as material help for the persecuted Christians in distant countries, but also as spiritual help for the Christians in the western states. The German section in particular developed a number of initiatives for evangelization in the German-speaking area after the turn of the millennium. The relief organization, still disliked by Father Werenfried in some Church circles, was seen by progressive Church representatives as one of the few remaining “conservative” organizations, which is hardly tolerated today.

Since the death of Bacon Priest there is a more or less intense impulse contending for control of ACN in progress. This not only has to do with the ideological opposites described, but also with desires such as power and influence. In order to have their backs, some personalities are pressing to limit themselves to helping persecuted Christians abroad. Also a form of quiet kicking.


The dirt buckets with Church tax money


Yesterday, the supplement Christ & Welt of the left-liberal weekly newspaper Die Zeit published a frontal attack on Father Werenfried. A confidential letter from a now retired auxiliary bishop from 2010 had been leaked to the paper, listing aspects of Rome that could stand in the way of a possible beatification process. It's routine. In the Roman method, there is, the historical figure of advocate diaboli. These references would only be relevant if they were confirmed.


The letter was sent to the Church in Need, the German bishops and the Vatican. It is not difficult to imagine from which side it was leaked to the Hamburg newspaper editors. For this, it is enough to know that Christ & World since 1980 was owned by the German Bishops' Conference, is that as editorially independent special supplement of the weekly newspaper since 2010. The time is displayed. The attack is financed with Church tax money.


On February 10th, Christ & Welt (Die Zeit) published the accusation against Father Werenfried under the title “Good and Evil”. The two authors use that mocking and derogatory tone that is now taken for granted in left-wing circles when reports are made about people who think differently. So it says boldly in the opening credits: "What happens to the Church if it loses an icon?"


The focus is on an alleged "coercion", also known as an alleged "rape attempt", which the then 60-year-old Werenfried is said to have undertaken against a 23-year-old employee. The charges are being flogged 18 years after the death of the Bacon Priest. The alleged victim did not report herself until years after his death.


The accusation of sexual abuse (for once, not homosexual) is currently the most targeted manslaughter instrument against a cleric and the Church as a whole. Indeed, shameful things have been done and neglected by a small clerical minority, think of the McCarrick case, but mostly in a homosexual context. This club can be swung particularly easily against Father Werenfried: he can no longer defend himself.

The extent of the dilemma in which the Catholic world finds itself in our latitudes has become evident in the past few hours. In fact, there is nobody to defend Father Werenfried, while the media in unison drag his memory through the dirt without questioning it. The younger ones don't know him anymore. In addition, the different parts of the Church have drifted apart, an organization like Kirche in Not [Church in Need], which has been branded with the label “conservative”, feels this particularly hard.


The result was shown yesterday. No sooner had Die Zeit started its shameful attack, reminiscent of the conviction in a show trial, than the aid organization Church in Need went on its knees, without a fight and weak in the knees as pudding. Thomas Heine-Geldern, the managing president, hurried to keep the greatest possible distance from Father Werenfried and implicitly hammered hard on the monument of a great man, as if he were eager to support the two Zeit journalists in the fall of the monument. To get praise and recognition? The motto in the aid organization's headquarters in Königstein seems to be: "Save yourself, whoever can!"


Heine-Geldern listed a total of 27 partly redundant points, which are a single pathetic dismantling of the renouned Bacon Priest. A shameful act by someone who basks in the life's work of Father Werenfried, but does not even attempt to defend him. A mere shout from a certain side is enough to capitulate today.

Nothing should be ruled out, but credibility and probability are at stake. It is not enough to jump out of cover after 36 or 48 years, that is, six or 18 years after Werenfried's death, and make the most serious accusations. The executive president of Kirche in Not, Heine-Geldern explains succinctly that the description of the then 23-year-old woman about the alleged coercion, alias rape attempt, is “credible”. That is not enough to take a guilt for granted, but that is exactly what the Heine-Geldern declaration means. In this way every deceased could be destroyed effortlessly. With Friends Like These, who needs enemies?
Whoever got to know Father Werenfried personally, like the author of these lines, knows about his integrity. Of course, even in the 80s it was a pleasant exception in the midst of the Church leaders who lagged behind the zeitgeist. It is therefore not enough for me what allegations are now being brought against him by journalists financed by Church taxes with obviously destructive intent, and it should not be enough for anyone.


What “credible” means is known since the literally unbelievable allegations against Hans Hermann Cardinal Groer. The archbishop of Vienna at the time did not fall because of the hostile, campaign-like attacks by the media and politics, but because of internal Church bills that were paid and because of the cowardice of Church officials, whose duty it would have been to defend the cardinal. Instead, those who wanted to "wash their hands in innocence" as quickly as possible, prevailed. The fact that the accused had to jump over the edge was accepted in a weighing of interests in which it was asked what was “more important”.Some did not want to put themselves in the line of fire of the press and socialists. 


A similar calculation seems to have been made in today's leadership of the Church in NeedThe "credibility" that Church in Need President Heine-Geldern mentions sounds like a fearful endeavor to get rid of a story that was perceived as unpopular - and that means buckets of filth for the media. The result was available yesterday. Father Werenfried van Straaten, a great figure in the post-war Church era, does not deserve that. 


And many do not seem to have earned their offices and posts in Church in Need and the German Bishop Conference.


Image: Church in Need (screenshot)

Trans: Tancred vekron99@hotmail.com

AMDG