Wednesday, August 25, 2021

Jews Pull Reigns on Pet Pope

 Edit: they’re shameless, but Bergoglio is their creature. I expect they will have more than just these initiatives to make him act right. 

[Times of Israel] Rabbi Ratzon Arusi, the chair of the Chief Rabbinate’s Commission for Dialogue with the Holy See, has expressed concern over recent remarks by Pope Francis about Jewish law, Reuters report.

According to the report, Arusi sent a letter to the Vatican requesting clarification of comments the pope made to a general audience earlier this month.

On August 11, Francis spoke at the Vatican about the first five books of the Bible, known in Hebrew as the Torah. The pope referenced the biblical story of God giving the Torah to the Jewish people: “God offered them the Torah, the Law, so they could understand his will and live in justice. We have to think that at that time, a Law like this was necessary, it was a tremendous gift that God gave his people.”

https://www.timesofisrael.com/liveblog_entry/israeli-rabbis-send-letter-to-vatican-expressing-concern-over-papal-remarks/?fbclid=IwAR3T_NVCRjxJPsh5KFvy0zEH_goRMOq_h_E_atfniPrY5zU0P79QZeeysNU

AMDG


8 comments:

Anonymous said...

Former bar bouncer Bergoglio isn't looking so robust anymore since he go his double dose of the abortion tainted VAXX a few months ago.

Constantine said...

please keep on mind, as an antiVaxxer, I also find "Jews" that are for it and against it. And atheist Jews are the only ones that involve themselves in senseless "Dialogue". To "Dialogue" means to give legitimacy to atheist and New Age Zionists and Masons.

Tancred said...

Oh, ok, we’ll just forget about the Jewish legacy at being in the vanguard of progressive degeneracy of the West, because there are “good Jews” who form false opposition.

Anonymous said...

"Anonymous Anonymous said...
Former bar bouncer Bergoglio isn't looking so robust anymore since he go his double dose of the abortion tainted VAXX a few months ago."

I read on one Catholic site that they were informed by people close to the VAtican and Pope Francis that:
1). The operation will mitigate the effects of his new ailment for a time, not cure it. It is a severe and progressive process and will eventually cause weakness, loss of weight, etc.
2) The doctors at the Polyclinico Agostino Gemelli in Rome wanted Bergoglio to stay in the hospital longer, because he was not doing as well as expected. He was doing "satisfactory", which is different than "good". In hospital terms, a statement of "satisfactory", is about a 70 (on a scale of 1-100). Passing, but not great.
3).I read that there is a growing air of "end of the Pontificate" in the Vatican, and that many higher-up clerics, even cardinals, know it....and some are distancing themselves from Francis agenda so as not to be tainted by it at Conclave time.....hence the fact none save for PArolin and 1-2 others praised his brutal smack-down of Summorum Pontificum.
4). Francis actually apparently told more than one associate (who blabbed), that "there might well be a new Pope in the Vatican by Spring).

Don't wish him ill, but I would'nt be surprised if this time he's right.

Damian M. Malliapalli

Anonymous said...


DON PIETRO LEONE AND RORATE CAEILI INTERPRET VATICAN COUNCIL II LIKE FR. JOHN COURTNEY MURRAY SJ : LUMEN GENTIUM 14(BAPTISM OF DESIRE) IS AN EXCEPTION TO TRADITION FOR THEM.
'The Council and The Eclipse of God' by Don Pietro Leone - Part XIV: The Church and The State’ on the weblog Rorate Caeili seems like the last death knell for the Lefebvrist and liberal interpretation of Vatican Council II which Bishop Athanasius Schneider corrected in his latest interview by Dr.Taylor Marshall.
Don Pietro Leone writing from his ivory tower built some 50 years back has interpreted the Council with Lumen Gentium 14 ( baptism of desire) referring to physically visible examples of salvation outside the Church since 1965.Then with this false premise, he rejects the traditional ecumenism of return of the Syllabus of Errors(he cites UR 3 as an exception in a previous installment of this series). He rejects the teaching on exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church according to the Athanasius Creed and the traditional ecclesiocentrism as Mass in Greek during the first four centuries.This is there in black and white in earlier blog posts on Rorate Caeili.
His non traditional interpretation of the Council,with the false premise(visible baptism of desire etc), like the popes from Paul VI, supports Fr.John Courtney Murray and Cardinal Richard Cushing in the separation of Church and State.
The liberals still ask, « Why should there be the non separation of Church and State and why should we proclaim the Social Reign of Christ the King in all political legislation, when non Catholics can be saved outside the Church ? ».Don Pietro Leone would agree with their reasoning. He is saying the same thing.
Pope Benedict also asked the same question. In an interview with the Italian daily Avvenire he said that EENS was no more like it was for the missionaries in the 16th century. There was a development with Vatican Council II. He also questioned the need for Mission. Since Vatican Council II says ( according to Pope Benedict and Don Pietro Leone) that there is salvation outside the Church.
He means with visible cases of the baptism of desire, of course.This is the salvation outside the Church he has always been supporting.
Rorate says:
In Chapter 4, Don Pietro turns to consider the Council’s teaching on the Church and State. He explains how the Church has a duty not only to Her members, but also to the entire world. Her role in regard to the State is to guide Kings and governors to promote the best interests of their citizens, i.e. in the final analysis the attainment of eternal life in Heaven, such as has been the constant teaching of Holy Mother Church. (Lionel : This cannot be done when Don Leone, Rorate Caeili and Pope Benedict interpret Lumen Gentium 14 with a false premise unlike Bishop Athanasius Schneider and Dr. Taylor Marshall ). Readers will be amazed to learn that an entirely new political vision was to supplant this teaching, a vision which originates in Freemasonry and of which the most notable fruits are the Declarations of the French Revolution and the American Constitution, namely, the total separation of Church and State.(Lionel : It was made possible theologically with the error in the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 to the Archbishop of Boston Cardinal Richard Cushing) The genius behind this devastating work of destruction was the American Jesuit, Father John Courtney Murray, who, unbelievably, was the author of all the speeches of the five bishops calling for these changes. F.R.

Fr. Murray sj could do nothing if Pope Paul VI interpreted Vatican Council II with the rational premise. The Council would be traditional. So religious liberty, ecumenism and inter-religious dialogue would no longer be an issue.The Church would still proclaim the Social Reign of Christ the King based upon the strict interpretation of extra ecclesiam nulla salus.-Lionel Andrades

Anonymous said...


BISHOP ATHANASIUS SCHNEIDER AND DR.TAYLOR MARSHALL SAY THERE ARE NO LITERAL CASES OF THE BAPTISM OF DESIRE BUT THE GERMAN SYNODAL pATH IS BASED UPON THERE BEING LITERAL CASES OF THE BAPTISM OF DESIRE(LG 14) BASED UPON THERE BEING LITERAL CASES OF THE BAPTISM OF DESIRE(LG 14) IN THE PRESENT TIMES
Bishop Athanasius Schneider in an interview with Dr. Taylor Marshall has said that there are no literal cases of the baptism of desire in the present times(2021). So LG 14 ( Case of the Catechumen) would be a hypothetical and speculative case only. But for Cardinal Marx this is not his interpretation of Vatican Council II upon which is based the German Synodal Way.For him LG 14 and also LG 16, UR 3, NA2, GS 22, LG 16,LG 8 would refer to literal cases of non Catholics in the present times (1965-2021) saved without ‘faith and baptism’(AG 7), outside the Church. It is only in this way that he can avoid affirming Catholic Tradition (EENS, Syllabus of Errors etc).
If the Germans interpreted LG 14 like Bishop Athanasius Schneider there would be no theological bases for the German Synodal Breakaway.
In France, Bishop Roland Mitterand in Dijon, wrote his books on the Concordats and the theology of religious pluralism by interpreting LG 14 irrationally.The French Bishops’ Conference must be asked to clarify that the baptism of desire is always hypothetical, theoretical and invisible for us human beings.In principle, hypothetical cases of LG 14, LG 16 etc cannot be practical exceptions in 2021 to Tradition ( Catechism of Pope Pius X, Council of Trent etc).
Like the French, Cardinal Peter Erdo in Hungary and the Hungarian Bishops’ Conference, could also be confusing the “implicit baptism of desire” of St. Thomas Aquinas as being explicit in the present times.
In Poland, the National Catechetical Center is in schism with the past Magisterium, since with visible cases of the baptism of desire, a hermeneutic of rupture is created with the Athanasius Creed, the Catechism of Pope Pius X (24Q,27Q).They need to issue a statement on this issue.

Their Episcopal Conference, like those all over the world, interpret the baptism of desire with a fake and not rational premise . So there is a fake break with Catholic Tradition.
The Schneider-Marshall video is really asking the U.S bishops to be ethical and honest.They are saying that the cardinals and bishops in Britain are also dishonest, when they project the baptism of desire as an exception to EENS according to the missionaries and Magisterium of the 16th century.
The bishops in Switzerland had also been asking the Society of St. Pius X to interpret the baptism of desire with the irrationality mentioned by Bishop Schneider, and then to accept the non traditional conclusion.This is not Catholic.
Pope Benedict did not grant canonical recognition to the SSPX and said it was a doctrinal issue.Bishop Charles Morerod in Switzerland would not allow the SSPX to use the churches there, and said it was a doctrinal issue. They had to continue to interpret Vatican Council II with the false premise and accept the non traditional conclusion, like the liberals.
Pope Benedict needs to be honest.He needs to apologize to the SSPX.-Lionel Andrades

Anonymous said...



AUGUST 28, 2021
Bishop Athanasius Schneider has said that there are no known literal cases of the baptism of desire in our human reality but Cardinal Ratzinger wrote Redemptoris Missio and Dominus Iesus with there being literally known cases of being saved with the baptism of desire
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/08/bishop-athanasius-schneider-has-said_28.html

AUGUST 27, 2021
Bishop Athanasius Schneider and Dr. Taylor Marshall are telling Pope Francis that all the books on Vatican Council II are written with a false premise and in general they are obsolete
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/08/bishop-athanasius-schneider-and-dr.html



AUGUST 26, 2021
Bishop Schneider and Dr. Taylor Marshall directly oppose Pope Francis on the New Theology : Vatican Council II is not a break with Tradition when the premise is rational
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/08/bishop-schneider-and-dr-taylor-marshall.html


AUGUST 25, 2021
Bishop Schneider is one step away from saying that Vatican Council II does not contradict Tradition and the SSPX are no more in schism
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/08/bishop-schneider-is-one-step-away-from.html

AUGUST 25, 2021
Bishop Athanasius Schneider has said that we do not know of any literal case of someone saved with the baptism of desire in the present times
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/08/bishop-athanasius-schneider-has-said.html

Catholic Mission said...

AUGUST 31, 2021

POPE BENEDICT HAS ALWAYS SUPPORTED THE GERMAN SYNOD WITH HIS IRRATIONAL INTERPRETATION OF VATICAN COUNCIL II.BISHOP ATHANASIUS SCHNEIDER AND DR. TAYLOR MARSHALL HAVE OVERTURNED THE INTERPRETATION.FOR THE GERMAN BISHOPS LUMEN GENTIUM 14 (BAPTISM OF DESIRE) IS AN EXCEPTION TO TRADITIONAL EXTRA ECCLESIAM NULLA SALUS.FOR SCHNEIDER AND MARSHALL IT IS NOT.

All these years bishops supported the German pope’s political left interpretation of the Council.Now our pope emeritus can break away from his compatriot bishops.He has to issue a statement. He must announce that there are no literal cases in 2021 of non Catholics saved with the baptism of desire(LG 14).This is something obvious. It is a given.
Bishop Athanasius Schneider has exposed Pope Benedict. For the pope, Jews do not need to convert into the Catholic Church as members for salvation. Since the exception (LG 14 etc) is the rule.
But we know that the norm for salvation is Ad Gentes 7( all need faith and baptism for salvation) and there really are no exceptions in LG 8, LG 14,LG 16,UR 3, NA2, GS 22 etc, to AG 7 or the strict interpretation of EENS. Vatican Council II is dogmatic. It supports EENS. The Council is Feeneyite and not Cushingite.

Yet so many German and European authors have published books based upon Cardinal Ratzinger’s New Theology. There is a new liberal culture in the Church. Many of these books, including manuals of theology, are useless. Since they carry the Ratzinger virus .He has also influenced the Americans. So much of Scott Hahn’s writings are now straw.
Pope Benedict has been a modernist pope and has blocked traditional Catholic mission. »Why have mission, » he asked, « when Vatican Council II says there is salvation outside the Church ? ».Vatican Council II says this only with his false premise which creates the new theology.
He does not proclaim the Social Reign of Christ the King in world politics ( Why ? LG 14 says for him, that outside the Church there is salvation).So now there are two interpretations of Vatican Council II. His and Schneiders.

He does not call for the non separation of Church and State(Why ? LG 16 is an exception to Feeneyite EENS).
He wrote the foreword for a book presented before the Italian leftist Senate. It supported the separation of Church and State. His priority was saving his life and the Vatican.

Pope Benedict must acknowledge his great contribution towards the German Synodal Path, also approved by Pope Francis.

The new moral theology with its permutations and possibilities is false. Cardinal Ratzinger let it pass at the universities.

Pope Benedict is the father of the Amoris Laetitia- moral theology. Who among us can judge general exceptions to the teaching on mortal sin, as the Catechism of the Catholic Church suggests, when interpreted irrationally ?.

He also approved seminarians being removed who did not accept Vatican Council II with the false premise.They instead affirmed EENS and got kicked out of the seminary( like me).We can see the results today in Germany and the rest of the world.
Pope Benedict must be asked to tell the German bishops that Vatican Council II can be interpreted with a rational premise and that he had made an objective mistake since 1965.

Also the SSPX in Germany must be allowed to interpret Vatican Council II with a rational premise and so affirm traditional ecclesiocentrism. His books on ecclesiology in Germany promote a false Profession of Faith, Oath Against Modernism and the Oath of Office of the Bishop. There are two interpretations now for the First Commandment, the Great Commission and Vatican Council II itself.- Lionel Andrades

MONDAY, AUGUST 30, 2021
Pope Benedict needs to be honest and apologize to the Society of St. Pius X(SSPX)
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/08/pope-benedict-needs-to-be-honest-and_30.html
____________
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/08/pope-benedict-has-always-supported.html