Monday, April 12, 2010

Traditionalism's Proving Ground

Pretty amazing considering some of the editorial decisions we've heard of taking place at NOR in the last few years. Is this an admission that "we were wrong"? Is it an apology and a recognition of the power of Catholicism as it's always been practiced everywhere? We note the conclusion that NOR still seesm to be witholding judgement, but the fact that 20% of the Seminarians now studying in France are destined to say the Immemorial Rite, could it be that NOR might just want to realign itself in the future and put its money on the better jockey and the stronger horse?

March 2010

How bad have things gotten in the Catholic Church in France? According to a report in La Croix, they've never been worse. The French Catholic weekly has published the results of a recent survey taken by the Institut français d'opinion publique (IFOP). Among other startling statistics, IFOP found that the number of Frenchmen who identify themselves as Catholic fell from 81 percent in 1965 to 64 percent in late 2009. What's more, the number of self-identified Catholics who attend Mass at least once a week fell from 27 percent to an appalling 4.5 percent during that same time period.

To put it in perspective, those of us who observe trends in the U.S. Church have expressed concern that average weekly Mass attendance in this country hovers around the 30 percent range (which represents a slight uptick, according to the latest data from Georgetown's Center of Applied Research in the Apostolate). That's roughly the same as France's high at the close of Vatican II, when the "extraordinary form" of the Mass — the Tridentine Latin version — was still the ordinary form. The Eucharist is supposed to be the "source and summit" of Catholic life, but for French Catholics it's long been a source of ambivalence. Perhaps we have here an inkling of why Church Fathers in the mid-20th century thought a reform was necessary. Unfortunately, Vatican II made an already bad situation worse. Nowadays, if not for tourists, the great historical cathedrals of France would be like empty airplane hangars.

On the catechetical side, things aren't much brighter. A whopping 63 percent of French Catholics believe that all religions are the same — that is, they profess the heresy of indifferentism. Seventy-five percent want the Church to reconsider her teaching against artificial contraception; 68 percent want the Church to do the same regarding abortion. These are staggering figures for a country that was once referred to fondly as "the Church's eldest daughter."

These figures just scratch the surface of a severe crisis. According to official Church statistics, in France between 1996 and 2005:
· Catholic marriages fell 28.4 percent;
· baptisms fell 19.1 percent;
· confirmations fell 35.3 percent;
· the number of priests fell 26.1 percent;
· the number of religious sisters fell 23.4 percent.
Hilary White, reporting for LifeSiteNews.com (Jan. 12), notes that, at the end of 2009, only 9,000 priests were serving in France, and fewer than 750 seminarians were studying for the priesthood. This in a country that is home to over 46 million self-professed Catholics — for now. Projecting forward, this drop in vocations will result in at least one-third of French dioceses either being forced to combine or ceasing to exist entirely in the next 15 years. Yet France ranks fourth on the list of the nations of the world with the most cardinals, boasting nine. Can you say "peter principle"?

French Catholics aren't too keen on the Pope either. Only 27 percent of respondents to the IFOP survey think that Pope Benedict XVI defends "rather well" the "values of Catholicism"; 34 percent think he defends them "badly." On the bright side, these numbers reflect a thawing of the frosty French attitudes that characterized the immediate aftermath of the Pope's January 2009 lifting of the excommunications of four bishops of the traditionalist Society of St. Pius X (SSPX; which has roots in France). At that time, 57 percent of respondents to a Le Parisien poll had a negative opinion of the Pope. A March 2009 poll in Le Journal de Dimanche found that 43 percent of French Catholics wanted Benedict to "step down"; 33 percent of practicing Catholics did as well. And to think that these polls were conducted in the afterglow of Benedict's 2008 visit to France less than six months earlier.

The story of Catholicism in France today is one of utter and abysmal failure.

But nature hates a vacuum, so something must step into the gaping spiritual void in the heart of French culture. According to veteran Vatican observer John L. Allen Jr., the two most dynamic religious movements in France today are Islam and traditionalist Catholicism.

Among European nations, France has the largest Muslim population at five million. But before we get all up in arms over a looming Islamic "threat," we should note that the pile-driving effect of secularism in France hasn't spared that religion: According to a 2008 IFOP survey, only 39 percent of Muslims pray five times a day (as is obligatory for Muslims), and a mere 23 percent attend mosque for Friday prayers on a weekly basis. Still, from the lowly Catholic vantage point, 23 percent weekly attendance is in the stratosphere. Thirty-eight percent of French Muslims consider themselves "non-practicing believers"; 34 percent admit to drinking alcohol (alcohol consumption is forbidden in Islam). Based on these figures, it's difficult to believe that the alleged Islamic fundamentalist takeover of France is as imminent as some Western alarmists contend.

That leaves the other movement vying for France's soul: traditionalist Catholicism. "Nowhere else," Allen has written, "are traditionalists so visible, and, at times, so fractious, as in France." The poll numbers in reaction to the Pope's magnanimous gesture toward the bishops of the SSPX speak to traditionalism's polarizing effect on French Catholicism. In fact, the release of Summorum Pontificum in 2007, Pope Benedict's motu proprio that liberalized the Tridentine Latin Mass, "unleashed negative reactions among moderate-to-liberal Catholics," Allen wrote, "and complaints reached Rome that a handful of bishops were resisting implementing the decree." Summorum Pontificum was "widely interpreted here as a victory for the traditionalist camp."

To the victors go the spoils. Hilary White reports that Summorum Pontificum "is acting as a catalyst for growth in the few areas where it has been accepted by bishops." In the small pockets of French Catholic life where traditional liturgical practice has been allowed to germinate, Catholicism is "flourishing." According to Paix liturgique, a French traditionalist group in union with Rome, since the release of Summorum Pontificum, 72 new chapels and churches have been given over to use of the extraordinary form, an increase of 55 percent over the previous count of 132 approved places of worship (the SSPX reportedly commandeers 184 sites where illicit Catholic Masses are held).

Paix liturgique further notes that 14 percent of French ordinations in 2009 were for the extraordinary form of the Roman rite (the Tridentine Mass), and over 20 percent of seminarians (160 total) are currently destined to serve in the extraordinary form. The Diocese of Fréjus-Toulon, host to the only seminary in the world that trains priests in both the ordinary (post-Vatican II) and extraordinary forms of worship, alone boasts 80 seminarians.

During the Pope's 2008 visit to France he told the French bishops to ameliorate their generally intransigent attitude toward the traditionalists in their care because "every person, without exception, should be able to feel at home, and never rejected…. Let us therefore strive always to be servants of unity!"

The challenge for traditionalism will be to place itself at the service of unity rather than fraction and division, for which it has been known. (To wit, no less than seven splinter groups have broken from the SSPX, which itself broke communion with the Church in 1988.) Traditionalism will have to step away from its insular pockets and free itself of its embattled, embittered aura if it is to stand a chance of attracting the interest and imagination of highly secularized Frenchmen.

The question before us is whether traditionalist Catholicism can not only resuscitate the Body of Christ in France but restore to it enough vim and vigor to challenge the secular Goliath for the soul of the nation while holding off a latent Islam. If traditionalism proves itself unworthy of the task, what hope is there for the future of the faith in France? If it succeeds, it will have drawn up the blueprint for the renewal of the Church universal.


DOSSIER: The Latin Mass & Trad Renaissance

Link to original...

Pope Benedict's Review of Pius XII Film

CASTEL GANDOLFO, Italy, APRIL 12, 2010 (Zenit.org).- Here is a translation of the address Benedict XVI gave Friday at the Apostolic Palace in Castel Gandolfo after viewing the film "Sotto il Cielo di Roma" (Under the Roman Sky). The film is set in 1940s Rome, and reflects the Church’s efforts to save people from the Nazis, as well as Adolph Hitler’s plot to kidnap the Pope.

Read further...

Just Asking: Where Were the Jews When Farrakhan's Priest Buddy Got the Award Last Night?

And Cardinal George is trying to silence Tom Roesser?


Pfleger Controversy.

At the heart of the controversy over the radical Fr. Michael Pfleger’s selection for a “racial justice” honor by the Chicago Catholic archdiocese was the white Pfleger surrounding himself with a black mob and threatening a legally constituted white shopkeeper with hate language and death (“we’ll snuff you out! Come out or we’ll drag you out like the rat you are!”)…but even more significant, the priest’s determinedly close support of Minister Louis Farrakhan who has taunted Jews, lauded Hitler and swims up to his neck in anti-Semitism—while a Catholic priest applauds…uncritical.

But all this we know. My question now is this:

Why have the Jews been so silent in all this…while conservative Catholics and evangelical Protestants have been so aghast at the black preacher’s hated of Jews and Pfleger’s patronizing of him? . Why haven’t Jews been outraged at the white preacher’s evident tolerance of it—and at the Archdiocese for rewarding him?. Moreover, why aren’t the so-called “mainstream media” aroused by this evident transference of a bigot’s number one fan to the role of defender of social and racial justice?


Read further, here...

It's our Kaytn Trauma All over Again: Poland

Among the various infallible dictates of the Nurenberg trials after World War II, was the mistaken notion that the massacre of Poles in the Kaytn forest were attributable to the Germans. What other jokes that post-war Europe played on History will be revealed in eternity?

Waclaw Oszajca was struggling to come to terms with the full scale of his country's worst postwar tragedy. But as he clicked through portraits of the 96 victims of the Smolensk air crash on a news website a very personal story unfolded.

The voice of the 53-year old Jesuit priest and one of Poland's most respected theologians fell to a whisper as he pointed out the faces of friends, including a priest, a military chaplain, government aides and a historian.

"These were some of our best," said Oszajca, who yesterday took a train from his home in Lublin to Warsaw, to pay tribute to them on national radio. "They were wiped out in seconds. Young, old, women, men, leftwing, rightwing. It's our Katyn trauma all over again," he said.


Link to original...

Bishop blames Jews for Sex Abuse Scandal

A furious transatlantic row has erupted over quotes that were attributed to a retired Italian bishop, which suggested that Jews were behind the current criticism of the Catholic church's record on tackling clerical sex abuse.

A website quoted Giacomo Babini, the emeritus bishop of Grosseto, as saying he believed a "Zionist attack" was behind the criticism, considering how "powerful and refined" the criticism is.

The comments, which have been denied by the bishop, follow a series of statements from Catholic churchmen alleging the existence of plots to weaken the church and Pope Benedict XVI.


Link to original...

Why humanists shouldn’t join in this Catholic-bashing

Monday 29 March 2010

The reaction to the paedophile priest scandal is as guilty of scaremongering, illiberalism and elitism as the Catholic Church has ever been.

by Brendan O’Neill

With all the newspaper headlines about predatory paedophiles in smocks, terrified altar boys and cover-ups by officials at the Vatican, it is hard to think of anything worse right now than a sexually abusive priest. Yet today’s reaction to those allegations of sexual abuse is also deeply problematic. For it is a reaction informed more by prejudice and illiberalism than by anything resembling a principled secularism, and one which also threatens to harm individuals, families, society and liberty.

Read Further...

Vatican Celebrates 40th Anniversary of Beatle's Breakup

This must be a joke, a parody or something?

Link to original...

Richard Dawkins calls for arrest of Pope Benedict XVI -Times Online

Richard Dawkins will be mortified some day, hopefully before his death, to find out that his lunacy was more of a help to the "obscurantism" of Catholicism than a hinderance.

Richard Dawkins calls for arrest of Pope Benedict XVI -Times Online

Institute of Christ the King Sisters in St. Louis



At present, Archbishop Carlson is supportive of this initiative begun by soon to be Cardinal Burke. Archbishop Carlson is one of the most intelligent and canny Bishops in the Church today. Some of us thought at one point that all the lights were burnt out in the Vatican and that it was full of venal and shortsighted political creatures, but we're beginning to see that things are beginning to turn around.

BY GREG JONSSON gjonsson@post-dispatch.com 314-340-8253


04/04/2010

Sister Marie of the Love of God inherited a fixer-upper.

The young nun was sent from Italy to St. Louis in September to turn an old convent building at St. Francis de Sales into the American home of her small order, the Adorers of the Royal Heart of Jesus Christ Sovereign Priest.

She found herself in a sprawling old building with a warren of rooms on each of three floors, most of it not fit for human habitation. The challenges it presented would be familiar to anyone who's rehabbed a historic home in the city: an outdated electrical system, ancient pipes, clanking old radiators, linoleum glued down over beautiful wood floors.

"People ask me if I need help," said Sister Marie, 31, originally from Paris. "I tell them yes, for 20 years."
More in religion


Read further...

Photo:(Christian Gooden/P-D)

Let's get the Story Straight: Defrocking and Divorce

| Fr. Joseph Fessio, S.J.

The following piece was written by Fr. Joseph Fessio, S.J., founder and editor of Ignatius Press, in response to the breaking story about a 1985 letter written by then-Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger to Bishop John S. Cummins of Oakland.

The so-called "stalled pedophile case", blame for which has been laid at the feet of then-Cardinal Ratzinger, had nothing to do with pedophilia and everything to do with strengthening marriage and the priesthood.

Here's what was happening in 1981 when Bishop Cummins of Oakland first wrote the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith asking that one of the priests from his diocese of Oakland, be dispensed from his promise of celibacy.

Well first, what was not happening. The letter came a week before Cardinal Ratzinger had even assumed his duties as Prefect of that congregation. This is a very important office of the Roman curia. It handles a variety of cases worldwide, mostly having to do with defending and promoting doctrinal integrity in the Church. There's a lot of work to do, and it takes time for someone to become fully engaged in its activities.

But much more pertinently here: By 1980 the effects of the sexual revolution on marriage and the priesthood had been devastating. In 1965 there had been 59 marriage annulments granted by Rome to American couples. By 2002, there were over 50,000 annulments per year in the U.S. alone. Hundreds, perhaps thousands of priests were asking for dispensation from their promise of celibacy in order to be able to marry.

The Catholic Church holds the marriage vows to be indissoluble. Even an annulment, contrary to a widespread misconception, does not dissolve those vows. It is a declaration that because of some impediment, there never was a valid marriage in the first place.

Priestly ordination is also "indissoluble", in the sense that a validly ordained priest never ceases to be a priest.

And here's the rub. It was literally scandalous in the Church that priests, who had been prepared for eight to ten years for their ordination (which would be permanent, irreversible) and their promise of celibacy (which also has the character of a solemn promise before God), were, in the 1970s, being so easily dispensed from their promise of celibacy.

Married Catholics said to themselves: If a priest, who is so well prepared for his commitment, can so easily be dispensed from it so that he can marry, why can't we be dispensed from our commitment so that we can remarry?

When John Paul II was elevated to the papacy in the Fall of 1978, he immediately changed the policy on priestly dispensations. I don't have the exact dates and numbers at hand, but I remember at the time that many of us were amazed that the hundreds of dispensations per year (and it may have been thousands) under John Paul II's predecessor, Paul VI, suddenly were reduced to almost zero. It was almost impossible to get a dispensation in 1980.

What was John Paul's intent? To restore the integrity of the priesthood and of marriage. These commitments are permanent. A priest may be removed from ministry, but he will not be given a dispensation to marry. Priests are to be made to take their commitments with utmost seriousness. They will be an example to married couples to take theirs seriously also. When a priest makes a promise of celibacy, it's forever; when a couple make vows of marriage, it's forever.

This is the decisive context of Cardinal Ratzinger's letter to Bishop Cummins. It is not a smoking gun. It did not mean that Ratzinger was not taking the priest's sins seriously. (He called the accusations "very serious" [gravis momenti].) It meant that he, following the policy of John Paul II, was taking the priesthood and its commitments very seriously.

And again, this entire affair had nothing to do with preventing further abuse by this priest. That had already been done, or should have been done, by the local bishop.

A final, minor but significant point of translation. The translation being used by the media of an important part of Ratzinger's letter is: "your Excellency must not fail to provide the petitioner with as much paternal care as possible". This has been rightly interpreted by some to mean that Ratzinger was saying that the bishop should keep a watchful eye on the priest. The original Latin makes that even clearer: "paterna...cura sequi" which means "to follow with paternal care". We get the word "persecute" from the Latin "per-sequi". "Sequi" is much stronger then "provide".

There is a completely mistaken first premise underlying all this criticism.The premise is that "defrocking" has anything to do with protecting victims and preventing further abuse.

First, the media needs to know that according to Catholic teaching, Holy Orders is a sacrament which leaves an "indelible mark"; in layman's terms, once ordained a priest, a man is always a priest. The reason the word "dispensation" is used in the correspondence is that that is what happens technically: the priest is dispensed from his obligation of celibacy. In a sense, this works in the opposite direction from protection: a restraint is being removed.

Further, as if to prove this point, the priest in question continued to abuse children after he was "defrocked" and had married. QED.

Secondly, nothing at all prevents a bishop from: removing a priest from all ministry; removing his faculties; reporting him to civil authorities. There is no need even to inform Rome about this. The only way (until 2001 or in cases of abuse of Confession) that it need get to Rome is if the priest appeals the bishop's actions.

Thirdly, why was the CDF involved anyway? That was not the congregation that handles abuse cases, except where abuse of Confession has played a role. I believe the CDF was involved in cases of dispensation from celibacy. (Though you would think that should be under the Congregation for Priests.) But, again, dispensation has nothing to do with preventing further abuse. It may appease the sense of justice on the part of victims. But at the same time, It normally takes eight to ten years to become a priest. It's not a club one joins. It is a very serious thing to dispense a priest from celibacy, and there needs to be a careful process to protect innocent priests.

Fourthly, there are definitely cased of priests who have been falsely accused. Especially the American media ought to be sensitive to the principle that a man is innocent until proven guilty. Civil law requires that to be done in a court of law. A bishop can, and in many cases, should take action against a priest before there is any canonical trial.

Finally, let's compare this to the difference between a criminal and a civil trial. Criminal trials can be expedited, but even then in all but the most grievous cases, a criminal defendant is a free man until convicted. In the case of priests, the "punishment" of removal from ministry can be applied immediately by a bishop even before there is any canonical trial, which is like a civil trial. How long do civil trials take in this country. I know of trials that have dragged out for more than seven years.

If Ratzinger took part in "stall[ing]" a "pedophile case", the worst one can say is that he wanted care taken in a canonical trial. And, let's not forget, this wasn't "punishment" at all from the priest's point of view. He had "asked" to be dispensed.

Link to original...

Thank you for your interest in the Catholic Church

It might even be interesting if they asked Whoopi Goldberg, she always says something that is useful to conservatives.

Thank you for your interest in the Catholic Church

Posted using ShareThis

Everyone has an opinion about the Catholic Church sex abuse scandals and Pope Benedict XVI.

Ah, you’ve noticed.

Roseanne Barr thinks perhaps Catholic parents who take their children to church ought to lose custody of them.

A U.N. judge, Geoffrey Robertson, thinks the Pope should be detained in Britain later this year and then tried in an international court.

Rosie O’Donnell thinks the Catholic Church is almost like Jonestown.

Maureen Dowd is so apoplectic she lent her column to her “conservative” and “devout” Catholic brother Kevin who doesn’t know that laymen aren’t allowed to “perform the sacraments”.

Sally Quinn declares this to be a Watergate moment and Pope Benedict XVI is Nixon.

Sunday, April 11, 2010

The Feast of St. Leo the Great: a Greek Hymn to Papal Supremacy


The Following is an excerpt from the Inimitable Dom Gueranger's Liturgical Year on the Feast of Leo the Great who turned back the barbarian Huns at the gates of Rome.

Leo the First, a Tuscan by birth, governed the Church at the period when Attila, the king of the Huns, surnamed the Scourge of God, was invading Italy. Attila pillaged and burned the city of Aquieleia, which he took after a three years' siege. This done, he rushed on Rome like a wild firebrand. He had reached the place where the Mincio joins the Po, and was on the point of ordering his troops to pass the river, when he was met by Leo, who was moved with compassion at the misfortunes that were threatening Italy. Sush was his superhuman eloquence, that he induced Attila to retrace his steps. When asked by his people how it was that, contrary to his custom he had yielded such ready obedience to the demands of the Roman Pontiff, the king answered, that he beheld, whilst Leo was speaking, a personage clad in priestly robes, who stood near, with a naked sword in his hand, and threatened him with death unless he obeyed the Pontiff., Whereupon he returned to Pannonia.

The Greek Church, in her Menaea, has an office in honour of St. Leo: we take from it the following stanzas. As they were composed before the Schism, they show us that the ancient Church of Constinatinople believed the supremacy of the Roman pontiff, and that it is not the Latins that have changed the faith. The Greeks keep the Feast of St. Leo on February 18.

O happy Pontiff ! glorious Leo ! thous has been made companion of the faithful priests and martyrs: for thou wast most invincible in battle, and immovable as a tower and fortress of religion. Thou didst proclaim, with most perfect orthodoxy and wisdom, the unspeakable generation of Christ.

O ruler of orthodoxy, teacher of religion and holiness, light of the whole earth, divinely insired glory of true believers, wise Leo ! thou enlightenest all men by thy teachings, O harp of the Holy Ghost !

Heir of the See of Peter, the Prince of the Apostles, thou didst prexside over the Church: thou hadst his spirit, and wast inflamed with zeal for the faith.

Beaming with most bright light, thou, O holy Leo, didst admirably preach the ineffable and divine incarnation, teaching the two natures, and the two wills of the Incarnate God.

Resplendent with the knowledge of divine truths, thou didst scatter on all sides the brightness of orthodoxy, and dispel the darkness of heresy. Departing this life, thou, O blessed one ! now dwellest in the light that knows no setting.

O inspired minister of God's mysteries thou didst admirably preach that Christ is the Only Son and Lord, begotten of the Father before all ages, born for us of the Virgin, and dwelling on earth like unto us.

Seated with glory upon the throne of the pontificate, thou didest stop the mouths of lions, and madest to shine upon thy flock the light of the knowledge of God, by proclaiming the divine dogma of the adorable Trinity. therefore has thou been glorified as a holy Pontiff initiated in the grace of God.

Thou, as a dazzling sun, didst rise in the West and wisely dispel the error of Eutyches, who mingled and confused the two natures, and that of Nestorius, who divided them as though they were two Persons. Thou taughtest us to adore one Christ in two natures, inseparably, interchangeably, unconfusedly united.

Inspired of God, thou didst appear to the people of God as another Moses, showing them the commandments of religion written, as it were, on tables. Thou didst explain in the assembly of the venerable masters: 'Praise, O ye priests ! and bless, and extol Christ for ever.'

Now, O priest of Christ ! thou art brightly decked with crown of beauty. As a faithful priest, thou has put on justice. Pray unceasingly for thy flock, now that thou has entered into the admirable joy of the Paradise of delights.

Thou, O most blessed Leo ! has worthily entered the abode where are the seats and throne and ranks of patriarch : thou hast entered as a true patriarch, all resplendent with faith and grace. Therefore do we all celebrate thy name for ever.

Vietnam and the Vatican: Realpolitik

The following document was found in the archives of the East German Stasi (Intelligence Service) after the fall of the Berlin Wall. It may be perused on pages 45-52 of the book "Spies in the Vatican: The Soviet Union's Cold War against the Catholic Church," by John Koehler.

At the time of the conversation, North and South Vietnam had recently signed a peace treaty in Paris. However, the Vietnamese Communists continued their offensive in the South. With the full support of Pope Paul VI, Richard Nixon continued removing American troops from the threatres of combat.


Department X Berlin March 29, 1973
Log No. X/ 980/73
Translation from the Russian.
TOP SECRET!
Information from the Security Organs of the People's Republic of Poland.

Stenographic transcript of negotiations between the Paul VI and the Foreign Minister of South Vietnam, Tran Van Lam.

Vatican February 22, 1973.

Pope: I greet you Mr. Minister. May God bless you.

L: I thank Your Holiness. I have the honor to deliver a letter and greetings from our President, Mr. Van Thieu.

Pope: That is very kind of him. We are very thankful to President Thieu that he also thought of us. We must thank the merciful God that he has given us hope in these hours.

L: Your Holiness, we are very worried. WE feel ourselves as betrayed and abandoned. So many of our young people have perished for nothing.

Pope: Only God knows the value of self-sacrifice and not a single sacrifice offered to God will have been in vain.

L: Our people noe are experiencing hours of suffering. We became an object of barter in the hands of the great powers, and we believed that the United States was our friend.

Pope: This they are, Mr. Minister. When we can maintain the peace, then your sacrifices will not have been in vain. Please believe us...

L: For us this war has not yet ended.

Pope: Mr. Minister, you surely mean the struggle for a free and peaceful development of your wonderful people. Should that be so, then we share your fears and those of President Van Thieu. The important factor is to put an end to this fratricidal war, a war not only between the children of one and the same God, but of one and the same homeland as well.

L: But we are still fighting.

Pope: We know about that. We pray often to God that He spare the people who are so dear to our hearts, of further sacrifices and pain.

L: Mr. Nguyen Van Thieu instructed me to thenk Your Holiness for the help which during all these years You have provided us either direct through the Papal Throne, or through representatives of various Catholic organizations.

Pope: We thank you. We wanted to do more, but unfortunately we are also dependant on the generousity of others.

L: Our Government entertains the hope that, in these difficult hours, it will not also be abandoned by the Catholic Church.

Pope: Our heart beats for you. We will never abandon you, but as you know, Our voice does not always find resonance.

L: However, in spite of all this, the diplomacy of the Papal Throne favors the agreement between the United States and the Government of Hanoi.

Pope: Yes, that is true. Inv arious circumastances, we gave you to understand that all the firing must cease. Those on the other side were your foes, but at the same time also your brothers. We told the same thing to Mr. Xuan Thuy [of North Vietnam].

L: We felt very disappointed, and it was for us a great surprise, when we heard that Your Holiness wished to receive this Communist.

Pope: We always receive all. This house is the House of God.

L: But they are the enemy of the Church and the enemy of all religions. They are the enemy of humanity.

Pope: We have nothing in common with their ideology, but we worry over the question of peace and the discontinuation of firing.

L: In our country we have almost one million of refugees from North Vietnam. In many cases they are Catholics and clergymen, who fled to us to escape Communist persecution.

Pope: This is well known to us. God values the good that you have done. Who knows, perhaps today's happenings are the days of God's mercifulness. Please believe us, believe us, that most importantly is the ceasefire.

L: But we already no longer feel safe from new Communist attacks.

Pope: Mr. Minister, God's mercifulness is unending. I beg you not to forget that times have changed.

L: Our Catholic Bishops also are full of fear and are worried.

Pope: We know that, Mr. Minister. But, look, it is necessary that one must trust in God in whose hands one must place one's self of his own free will.

L: But I am talking about politics, not Theology.

Pope: Yes, indeed. The Will of God shows itself in all spheres.

L: But we cannot simply give in to the Communists who occupy our Catholic soil.

Pope; We have provided you with help in every possible way. And despite that, we must jointly think about God's Will and bow to it even when it seems to us that things are not going well for us.

L: Does that mean that the Papal Throne will also forsake us?

Pope: What are you saying, Mr. Minister! We have already pulled together all of our resources in order to participate in the reconstruction of your glorious country.

L: But still, the help is for those from the North.

Pope: In your case the Papal Throne does not divide people according to borders. For us they are all children of a heavenly Father.

L: We are a people fighting for freedom.

Pope: That makes us very happy, Mr. Minister. WE wish to believe that it will help in freeing the political prisoners which are in your hands.

L: When it comes to that question, we have the best of intentions. However, the opponent has no political prisoners of ours since almost all were murdered.

Pope: A fratricidal war is the most horrible of all wars. Somebody has to make the beginning.

L: In a few days in Paris, I shall see the good will of our foe.

Pope: Mr. Minister, if you do all that depends on you, you will achieve peace and God's blessings.

L: But we are threatened by Communism.

Pope: According to your opinion, you have exactly the possibility to push ahead in with the question of neutralization of Vietnam, first in a divided then in a united Vietnam.

L: By the Communists? No!

Pope: We mean that such a process will be carried out by the sons of the Vietnamese people.

L: However, Your Holiness, we are of the opinion, that the decision on this question is, at this point, not even close.

Pope: The developments of the events will be shown. God will decide.

L: Before I travel to Paris, I wish to beg Your Holiness to excercise your great authority to influence Washington not to allow any Communist agreession against my country or the neighboring States.

Pope: Our staff maintains a steady contact with the staff of Richard Nixon. We believe that we have already used these means available to us.

L: Allow me to remark that you have already used these means in favor of our opponents.

Pope: For peace, Mr. Minister. Be so kind and relay to President Van Thieu our heartfelt best wishes and assure him of our fatherly understanding for the all of the Vietnamese people and for your State in the South.

L: I thank Your Holiness.

Pope: And we wish to also add out Apostolic Blessing for all those in Vietnam who expect justice, freedom, and a free dissemination of the truth.

L: I thank Your Holiness.

Article courtesy of Brendan D. King

Consequences of the Catholic Church's claim of statehood - latimes.com

Consequences of the Catholic Church's claim of statehood - latimes.com

Posted using ShareThis

Saturday, April 10, 2010

NCEA Conference with Garrison Keillor is Over

And Keillor was permitted to speak and allowed to give the impression that Catholic doctrine is as mutable as Keillor's choice of spouses, religion and locale.

Given Keillor's own Episcopalian religious affiliation, we don't understand why he insists on speaking on behalf of an organization he openly and shamelessly despises? Does this mean that he, in the parlance of the character assassins at NPR and the NYTs, support the "Nazi" Pope and his secrecy and medieval ism?

Perhaps it has something to do with the money and those city-slicker ways he learned when he got booted from New York City for being too boring and came crawling back to the little pond in flyover land.

What's really strange in Lake Woebegone is how the Communications Director will spin this, despite the 200k plus salary he receives to dither in his office and offer "no-comment" to journalists covering important stories.

It may not happen too soon, but these Archdiocesan offices really need to get the Todd Tambergs (Communications Director for Los Angeles) and Dennis McGraths into retirement.

Why is it that because it's religion based, that you can be incompetent, evil and lascivious but still make a lot of money? Even if you get caught at the above, you can always cry on camera and elicit sympathy from your supporters like Jim Baker did before he went to prison.

Check out the list of speakers. It's a practical guarantee that if you looked up their writings you'd find all manner of heresy, and these are people who are running Catholic education. No wonder Catholics don't know their Faith...

The Two Campaigns are Alike: as one Egg to Another


When Joseph Goebbels plotted his abuse campaign against the church, the bishops at that time did not drop to their knees.

By Hubert Hecker.

(kreuz.net) In the years 1936/37 Reich propaganda Minister Joseph Goebbels († 1945) battled -- national-socialist-morality criminal cases against the church with enormous press campaigns.

Goebbels - a lapsed catholic and a notorious adulterer - pursued several goals. Thus he presumed "thousands and thousands and thousands of church sex offenders".

With this lie he wanted to drive a wedge between the Clergy and Laity. The believers should be estranged from their hierarchy.

The numbers of those leaving the Church went up promptly in the years 1937 and 1938.

The withdrawing were however mainly Nazi Party members and marginal Catholics.

The Catholic people did not let themselves be impressed by the lies of the Anti-Catholic propaganda Minister.

The believers gathered only more closely around their priests and bishops and participated more intensively in their slandered Church.


Bishops: Truth instead of Cringing

The German bishops did not put their heads into the sand. They met the propaganda of the Goebbels media with courage and referred to the small number of misdemeanours in the church:

In the diocese Paderborn from 9.380 priests and religious and in 1937 six persons had been condemned.

From the 14,300 religious persons in the Diocese of Münster, seven persons had been punished.

Eight condemnations came from the Archdiocese of Munich's 11,250 secular priests and religious-- nearly always because of homosexuals' misdemeanours.


A Forerunner of "We are Church"

The Goebbels' press fight tried to pull in the Pope into the invented "moral swamp of the Roman church“ as well, in order to undermine the confidence of Catholics in their Roman Shepherds.

A sect around the magazine "the Rome-free Catholic" - a forerunner of the today's Anti-Church group of sects `We are Church' - grumbled on 16 June 1936:

"Thus the joint responsibility for the exposed monstrosity rests completely on Rome."

The magazine 'Rome-Free Catholic' was close to at that time the Nazi friendly Old-Catholic Church in the German Reich.

The Nazi Daily `West Deutscher Beobachter' headlined on 3 July 1936 "Vatican circles wrap themselves in silence“.

This tactical assumption is gladly repeated at present by media swarm.


The Mortally Hated Church

The German bishops did not go to its knees before the coordinated Nazi press.

The citizen of Berlin bishop Konrad von Preysing († 1950) wrote in his Pastoral Address on 7 May 1937:

"This very loud press front wants to strike the mortally despised church to destruction."

"One wants to declare the reputation of the Pope and the German bishops for Christianity and freedom of conscience in our German Fatherland."

"The Church's enemies use the morality of legal cases against priests and religious", in order to undermine the authority of the Pope and his words.

Only before - in March 1937 - Pope Pius XI had two months in the encyclical "Mit Brennender Sorge" frontally attacked the ideology of National Socialism.


Naturally the Nazis hated Celibacy Too

The German press coordinated by the National Socialists was made to represent the obscenities, much discussed by Goebbels, as "symptoms of the unnatural system" of the Church.

Goebbels' fight was directed - similarly as today - particularly against celibacy.

It was put together with "the Catholic bourgeois morality " as reactionary and outdated way of life.

Goebbels trumped up rare misdemeanours of individual clergyman, in order to provoke a general demoralization in the Clergy - as if he would never again be "in this frightening and infuriating extent able to determine the entire cultural history of mankind."


The Church Becomes Triumphant

The Bishops did not let Nazi propaganda sit idly. Thus Msgr von Preysing said clearly in his Pastoral Address:

„The Church's enemies use indecent assaults on Catholic clergyman in order to approach their goal: to exterminate the public believers of Christianity in Germany, unrestrainedly, without consideration for truth, justice and freedom of conscience."

In the conclusion he explained his Pastoral Letter:

"My Dear Children! Do not let yourself be confused in the faith or in the eternal mission of the Church."

"The Church of Christ will also victoriously overcome decline, error and vice in its own ranks as in the past."

"You will also triumph powerfully over the great droves and the more powerful the attacking opponent - the gates of hell will not be overcome by them. “


© used picture: Zyada,

Link to original...

Friday, April 9, 2010

USCCB Urges Nuclear Disarmament

Cardinal George is fascinated by destined to fail liberal foreign and domestic policy goals. It's not so much that the Bishops are playing a political role, it's not even that they are incompetent to play such a role, for political issues are well within the competency of a Bishop. Yet when socialist-style national Bishops Conferences speak out on various issues, it's almost entirely guaranteed to illicit a suspiciously pre-masticated and slavish adherence to the liberal social agendas of the day.

It's suspicious because many of these policies can be demonstrated to be deleterious to the health of the host nation, and it's especially poisonous to the credibility of Catholic institutions ultimately, because it is very clear that the Bishops aren't really responding from their own beliefs, (although many of them by virtue of their education hold such poisonous beliefs) but from an agenda established independent of the Catholic Church.

To put it another way, the USCCB is an organ with no authority, claiming to speak on behalf of the Catholic Church in a country, and yet it consistently works against the interests of both its host country and the Catholic Church.

Whoever is pulling the strings at the USCCB does not have the best interests of the Catholic Church at heart.

WASHINGTON—"The United States Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB) welcomes the signing of the new Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (START) between the United States and the Russian Federation," said Cardinal Francis George of Chicago, President of the USCCB, in an April 8 letter to President Barack Obama.

“The horribly destructive capacity of nuclear arms makes them disproportionate and indiscriminate weapons that endanger human life and dignity like no other armaments. Their use as a weapon of war is rejected in Church teaching based on just war norms,” Cardinal George wrote. The cardinal cited teaching from both the U.S. bishops and Pope Benedict XVI calling for a world without nuclear weapons.

“Based on a moral imperative to rid the world of nuclear weapons,” Cardinal George said, “the Conference of Bishops will be a steadfast supporter of strong and bipartisan action on the new START Treaty as an important and essential step toward a nuclear-weapons-free future.”


Read the article...

NYTs is Dying and Not even a Church Scandal Can Help

This isn't the first time the New York Times has lied about something or done poor research. Their assertions were based on a computer translation of a correspondence between +Weakland and Cardinal Bertone. Don't they have enough money to hire a translator? Their first mistake was in receiving the story from a 2nd rate Law Firm from the Midwest, but this isn't the first time they've been caught in a lie.

Will people still be willing to view NYTs as a credible news source?

Link to Father Z...

Pflegerizing Catholicism

By Michelle Malkin

So much that you need to know about the Catholic Church’s social-policy problems can be summed up in one word: Chicago. On race, abortion, guns, immigration, and “community organizing,” Catholic Church officials in the Windy City have forged unholy alliances with radical left-wingers and enablers who undermine the faith — and the faithful.

Exhibit A: the Archdiocese of Chicago’s Office for Racial Justice and one of its most notorious priests, the Rev. Michael Pfleger. This week, Chicago cardinal Francis George — who also is president of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops — presided over a gala ceremony honoring Pfleger with a “lifetime-achievement award” for his “service in pursuit of dismantling racism, injustice, and inequalities on behalf of African Americans and all people of color.”


Read further...

h/t: HA

A return of Penal Times in England?

The amusingly named Guardian has printed an article which suggests in tones of hope and glee, that the Holy Father might be arrested when he comes to England.

There hasn't been this much talk about arresting a Pontiff since the days of Joe Garibaldi and Napoleon Bonaparte who had himself arrested Pius VII and imprisoned him with the expectation that he would agree to Napoleon's subjugation of the Church. Upon refusing to submit to Napoleon's demands, occasionally, it was purported, Napoleon would threaten and physically beat the Pontiff. After failing to get Bl Pius IX in their clutches during the wars Italian Unification 1848-1870, the forces of evil have concocted another trick by creating a media frenzy throughout the world by appealing to people's natural sense of the sacredness and innocence of children, and attempting to portray the Catholic Church as responsible for the corruption of the same.

The irony of all of this shouldn't be lost on anyone familiar with such propaganda campaigns of the past, calculated to produce the destruction of an institution. French revolutionaries produced pornographic cartoon drawings of Marie Antoinette to obtain the downfall of her family and husband; strangely, the anger of the mob didn't turn against her tormentors, it turned against her.

It's taken many years to rehabilitate the memory of this woman and expose the lies which were told about her to perpetrate a political evil, and it may be that the Catholic Church will once again enjoy the same persecuted status It once enjoyed in England after Henry VIII, in France after Robespierre or in Russia after Lenin.

We fully expect that if Pope Benedict isn't arrested, the various governments will use this event as a pretext to confiscate church lands, supervise priests and bishops and even persecute individual Catholics whom they dislike for any number of arbitrary reasons.

The dictatorship of relativism is upon us, and we don't expect the forces of evil to triumph in destroying the Papacy.

Dying Left Coast Paper Lashes out at Vatican in its Death Agony: Op Ed

THE DETONATIONS occur with all the regularity of bombs going off in downtown Baghdad: the Church of Rome — the church of pomp, hierarchy, and authority — is imploding. The damage already sustained qualifies as catastrophic. There is more to come.

For Catholics, Easter this year was a joyless occasion. [For him perhaps, but for many, it certainly was. Chalk this comment up to spite] Rather than celebrating the Resurrection of Jesus, anguished pastors lamented the continued disintegration of the institution to which they have devoted their lives. In the pews, their dwindling flocks listened with a combination of sadness, dismay, and disgust.

The crisis touched off in 2002 by the clergy sex abuse scandal in Boston has now gone global. The Holy See’s obtuse response, combining self-denial with self-pity — it’s all the fault of a gossip-mongering media apparently — has shredded the last vestiges of Vatican credibility. [Wishful thinking. But what about media credibility, what about your credibility?] Simply put, what Rome says no longer matters. The bishops — those of this country in the vanguard — have already squandered any claim to trust. The pope himself now seems hell-bent on forfeiting what remains of his authority. If Wall Street rules applied, the Catholic Church would today be filing for Chapter 11 protection while fending off an Anglican takeover bid — depending on your point of view, a delicious or ironic prospect. Yet this moment of painful mortification holds great potential for clarification and renewal. The collapse of Christendom — the concept of a secular order based on Christian precepts — is now fully complete. So too is the triumph of modernity. No encyclical handed down from on high will reverse that verdict. We ourselves must deal with the consequences.


Link to original..

Don’t look to Rome for the true Catholic voices - The Boston Globe

Don’t look to Rome for the true Catholic voices - The Boston Globe

Posted using ShareThis

Extradition of Priest could Take Years: Minneapolis



MINNEAPOLIS — Extraditing a Roman Catholic priest from his native India to face charges of sexually assaulting a teenage girl in Minnesota could take several years, the prosecutor in the case said Thursday.

Roseau County Attorney Lisa Hanson said federal officials told her the extradition of Rev. Joseph Palanivel Jeyapaul could last four or five years if he's uncooperative. A formal extradition request was filed with the Department of Justice last fall, she said.

"I'm told the process is very slow and convoluted," Hanson said. "If he decides to fight it, we could be looking at a very long process."

Link to original...

photo: AP

Abbot Gabriel and Sister Maria Cordata, RIP



Two of the founding members of the Saint Benedict Center passed away auspiciously and peacefully in the days before Easter:

Abbot Gabriel passed away on Saturday, March 27, 2010, Sister Maria Cordata on March 30.

They were preceeded in death by the saintly and learned Brother Francis Maluf, the Ghassanid, who led the Slaves of Richmond Richmond for many years.

Although we have lost great teachers, mentors and spiritual benefactors, we must labor on in their apparent absence till we too are called to our particular judgements.

Thursday, April 8, 2010

Koch Defends Papacy: "He who is without sin cast the first stone"

believe the continuing attacks by the media on the Roman Catholic Church and Pope Benedict XVI have become manifestations of anti-Catholicism. The procession of articles on the same events are, in my opinion, no longer intended to inform, but simply to castigate.

The sexual molestation of children, principally boys, is horrendous. This is agreed to by everyone, Catholics, the Church itself, as well as non-Catholics and the media. The pope has on a number of occasions on behalf of the Church admitted fault and asked for forgiveness. For example, The New York Times reported on April 18, 2008, that the pope "came face to face with a scandal that has left lasting wounds on the American church Thursday, holding a surprise meeting with several victims of sexual abuse by priests in the Boston area.... 'No words of mine could describe the pain and harm inflicted by such abuse,' the Pope said in his homily. 'It is important that those who have suffered be given loving pastoral attention.'"

On March 20, 2010, the Times reported that in his eight page pastoral letter to Irish Catholics, the pope wrote, "You have suffered grievously, and I am truly sorry ... Your trust has been betrayed and your dignity has been violated."

The pope also "criticized Ireland's bishops for 'grave errors of judgment and failures of leadership.'"

The primary explanation for the abuse that happened - not to excuse the retention of priests in positions that enabled them to continue to harm children - was the belief that the priests could be cured by psychotherapy, a theory now long discarded by the medical profession. Regrettably, it is also likely that years ago the abuse of children was not taken as seriously as today. Thank God we've progressed on that issue.

Many of those in the media who are pounding on the Church and the pope today clearly do it with delight, and some with malice. The reason, I believe, for the constant assaults is that there are many in the media, and some Catholics as well as many in the public, who object to and are incensed by positions the Church holds, including opposition to all abortions, opposition to gay sex and same-sex marriage, retention of celibacy rules for priests, exclusion of women from the clergy, opposition to birth control measures involving condoms and prescription drugs and opposition to civil divorce. My good friend, John Cardinal O'Connor, once said, "The Church is not a salad bar, from which to pick and choose what pleases you." The Church has the right to demand fulfillment of all of its religious obligations by its parishioners, and indeed a right to espouse its beliefs generally.

Read further...

Catholic Church lobbying to retain the current time restrictions on lawsuits against institutions

Catholic Church lobbying to retain the current time restrictions on lawsuits against institutions

Posted using ShareThis

The truth about homosexual sex (OneNewsNow.com)

The truth about homosexual sex (OneNewsNow.com)

A vast sex and money scandal threatens the Vatican. But, once again, Ratzinger emerges as the campaigner against 'filth'

A vast sex and money scandal threatens the Vatican. But, once again, Ratzinger emerges as the campaigner against 'filth'

St. Catharines bishop resigns abruptly

St. Catharines bishop resigns abruptly

24% of Russians are for the Monarchy

In Belgorod (a regional centre in Middle Russia) at the end of March 2010 the Russian Imperial Union-Order organised a sociological research of public attitude to the monarchy and the Russian Imperial House. 180 people of different age and social status agreed to participate in the research.

13.4% of the participants are monarchists under their views. At the same time 69.5% are democrats and 10.5% are communists. 24.8% of the participants support the idea to restore monarchy in Russia. 50% of the supporters of the restoration are democrats under their political views, but they believe that the monarchy doesn’t contradict to democratic institutions.

52.4% of the participants have heard about existence and current social and charity activity of the Russian Imperial House, but only 25.8% of the participants know who is the current Head of the Russian Imperial House.

84.8% of the participants support the idea of the Russian Imperial House to return to Russia. 13% are sure that the Russian Imperial House would be the symbol of national unity. Only 2% are afraid of possible restitution of property to the Russian Imperial House (it is necessary to emphasize that the House always underlines that it is against the idea of restitution itself) and because of it are against the return of the Romanoff House.

Under the information of the Belgorod Department of the RIU-O


h/t: Russian Monarchist

To Monarchy Forum...

An Interview with Archbishop José H. Gomez – Blessing for the City of Angels

An Interview with Archbishop José H. Gomez – Blessing for the City of Angels

Posted using ShareThis

What Neocatholics don't like You to Know: LA Episcopal Appointment



Back on Monday this week, New Advent reported that they had an "exclusive" report of Archbishop Gomez' appointment ot LA. That was false. We'd reported it on Sunday Morning, and a lot of people saw it in happy hours of the Easter Feast. It was a festive occasion.

Well, it's been a few days since we found out that the next Archbishop of Los Angeles was going to be Msgr Gomez, and it's been a few days since we made the announcement here in confirmation of American Papist's forewarning that an appointment would be named "some time at the end of February". It's alright that a few other groups made the claim to an "exclusive" coverage and didn't mention us -- but it would be nice if some of the Seminary faculty resign as they promised they would do if a "conservative" were assigned to LA. At any rate, those guys who claim they got the scoop are neocatholics anyway. They didn't even make mention of a report that Archbishop Gomez doesn't use Eucharistic Monsters. In our announcement, we made some mention of Cardinal Mahony's controversial attacks on Tradition and compared and contrasted that with the much milder and "Traditionalist friendly" incoming Archbishop Gomez. We also made mention of the fact that Cardinal Gomez doesn't complain about the vocations shortage, he does something about it, like get the women out of the sanctuary and get men into the Seminary. We later learned that he has more than 100 Seminarians according to Harlequin King who sings in the Cathedral Schola.

The other neocatholic folks might not have appreciated our mention of Cardinal Mahony's planned wreckovation of St. Barbara's Parish, which now may be put indefinitely on hold, we hope, now that there's a new Sheriff in LA.

Our neocatholic friends didn't mention these details in their reports. We don't blame them so much for stealing our scoop, but we blame them chiefly for not drawing attention to some very interesting highlights we mentioned above like the Bishop's love of Vocations and promotion of the same, and Cardinal Mahony's detestable wreckovation, or the fact that Archbishop Gomez, who is in Opus Dei, tries to control the Universities in his See, horrible we know.

Sure, Rocco wanted to talk about Cardinal Mahony's marching around with Cesar Chavez. To his credit, we didn't get the impression that Rocco thought that was a good thing or a bad thing. But Rocco didn't say that Cardinal Mahony had bad labor relations and that depriving a worker of his just wage isn't the only sin that cries to heaven for vengeance. He just reported it matter of factly and we're grateful for it, but no one mentioned the fact that this new conservative Archbishop has currently 100 plus seminarians in formation right now. That's the mark of Benedict there for you and we think it's great; hope you do too.

Finally, this news has been known to the seminarians since 3 years. Why no one bothered to tell us Cardinal Mahony was out three years ago is beyond me. It might have lame ducked him had we known, before the Motu Propio, that the grand dragon of Los Angeles was destined for a mercifully foreseeable retirement.

Anyhow, we reported this story before New Advent did. It's not a big deal, but it would have been much nicer had you neocatholics said something about the planned wreckovation and the awesome vocations record of our new LA Bishops.

Finally, we'll leave you with one of the commenters at America, complaining bitterly (perhaps too bitterly to be convincing) about the appointment:

Prepare for Tridentine 1962
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Apr. 06, 2010.
Prepare for Tridentine 1962 rites in a few of your churches. And he does not EVER let women serve as Extra Ordinary Ministers in his masses ...even if it is in your own parish ! Your liturgies will be scrutinized and your music reviewed. It's all about the patriarch. He does not speak English well and seems sensitive that he doesn't. He sees the collection as his - your archbishops appeal amount will be doubled as the amount or even tripled as to the amount he wants. His focus is on seminary, seminary, seminary. He also likes to think that he controls the Universities during political times (ex. St. Mary's University was rented out by democrat H. Clinton as a speaking location, after it was held, he spoke out against it.). Do not give up, just keep on marching !



Btw, we support and encourage the idea of logging onto alien and non-Catholic forums like America and posting satirical things.

photo: St. John Valdosta blog

Bozell Column: The Media's Vatican Coup

[newsbusters] Our secular liberal media elites are never more poisonously insincere than when they recommend that conservatives should move closer to liberals, for their own good. Witnessing the relentless media attacks on the Catholic Church, no member of the flock should assume that the agitators at Newsweek or the New York Times know best how to steer the faithful – or even believe they want to help the faithful. Much like Ted Turner, who called Catholics “losers,” his media colleagues see Catholics – and particularly Pope Benedict XVI – as loathsome political obstacles.

One can conclude from all the coverage of sexual-abuse charges that those charges aren’t really the primary point for the “truth” seekers. These leftist media elites have hijacked those heinous actions for a much broader goal. Theirs is a very political crusade, with the goal of sacking Pope Benedict and “reforming” the ancient church in their hipster image, one that celebrates gay bishop Eugene Robinson’s Episcopalian gospel of “tolerance” and “inclusion” and “pluralism.” That kind of church would pose zero threat to the global goals of the left. In that kind of church, there is no stained-glass ceiling to untrammeled abortion and unlimited “marriage” of everyone to everyone.

Link to original...

http://newsbusters.org/blogs/brent-bozell/2010/04/06/bozell-column-medias-vatican-coup

Wednesday, April 7, 2010

Persecution of Christians in Palestine

http://www.christatthecheckpoint.com
http://www.pcpj.org/
http://www.kairospalestine.ps
http://www.bethlehemaffirmation.com/

Factsheet

Israeli Zionist Restrictions on Easter Celebrations in Occupied Jerusalem

“Christians all over the world can celebrate Easter, but for Christian Palestinians, the Israeli Zionist military occupation have made of everyday a good Friday (sad Friday in Arabic), and we are still waiting for our own resurrection as a free nation.” Fr. Firas Areedah, Jifna, Palestine.


Restrictions on the Freedom of Worship:

• Entry to Jerusalem for West Bank and Gaza Christians is always restricted. On the occasion of Easter, Palestinian Christians living outside of Jerusalem in the West Bank and Gaza are being required to apply for permits to access their holy sites in occupied East Jerusalem. It is estimated that of those, only 2000 – 3000 Palestinian Christians have received permits. Jews do not have to apply for permits to access their holy sites during their holy days nor in any other day.

• The permit system instated by Israel is in obvious violation of the ICPRR, Universal Declaration of Human Rights and other international covenants and treaties to which Israel is a signatory.

• Worshipers will be restricted by road blocks and check points around the West Bank and the Old City of Jerusalem.

• This year, buses going to Jerusalem from Ramallah and Bethlehem with worshipers planning to attend the Palm Sunday procession were stopped on the way by Israeli occupation forces (IOF). Many were unable to attend the historic procession.
Example: The Holy Family Scout Group, which belongs to the Roman Catholic Church in Ramallah, took four hours to reach occupied Jerusalem. They missed the procession from the Mount of Olives to the Old City. The drive, without checkpoints, would take about 20 minutes.

• During Jewish holidays, Palestinian areas are put under military closure.

• Palestinian Christians living in Jerusalem and the West Bank were denied entry to the Old City for the first two days of the holy week.

• Israeli Zionist military occupation police banned Palestinian Christians and scout groups from flying the Palestinian flag during the Palm Sunday procession.

• The heavy presence of Israeli Zionist Police and Military forces (around and in the Old City and surrounding the holy sites) disturbs the spiritual traditions of Easter.

• Every year Christians try to spiritually connect Bethlehem, the city were Jesus was born with city were the crucifixion and resurrection of Jesus have taken place. This connection is made through the traditional Sunday Palm march, in which this year many Palestinians and foreign supporters were arrested on their way. The two spiritual centers for Christians are separated by a complex network of apartheid walls, checkpoints and apparatuses.

• Last year, Israel prevented Palestinian Christians from attending the Holy Fire Saturday in Jerusalem. This year the church has objected to a permit system that was instated in an effort to limit those who attend the Saint Jacob church to witness the lightening of the Holy Fire. So far, Palestinian Christians are uncertain about what kind of restrictions they will face this Easter weekend.



Israeli Zionist Colony Activity in the Christian Quarter is changing the Face of the Old City:


Along the Via Dolorosa, the path on which Christians believe Jesus was taken from captivity to the cross, there are the 14 ‘Stations of the Cross’. Colony activity is prominent at most of those Stations:

o At Station 1: There is colony activity at the exit from the tunnels under the Old City.

o At Station 3: A colony building – the house of former Israeli terrorist Prime Minister Ariel Sharon, which was confiscated from the Palestinian Christian Francis Tams.

o At Station 5: A heavily protected colony located over Christian Palestinian homes and shops has changed the landscape of the station, where it is believed by Christians that Jesus fell the first time on his way to the crucifixion.

o At Station 9: Colony located over the Souq (market) going to Al Aqsa compound, visible from the Coptic neighborhood.

o At Stations 11, 12, 13 and 14 (Holy Sepulcher): The Moristan colony, known by Palestinians as Saint John. This property confiscation led to the forced eviction and cleansing of an estimated 44 Christian Palestinian families. Zionist Colonists have also taken over a Christian Monastery located in front of the Holy Sepulcher.

o There have been reports of hundreds of attacks by heavily armed Jewish religious colonists against Christian pastors, bishops, and nuns from all denominations, as well as Christian Palestinian civilians, in the Old City of Jerusalem.

o Zionist Colony activity in the Christian Quarter in the old city of Jerusalem has increased lately, aiming to change the identity of the place. Examples: Work nearby the Jaffa Gate, threats to close the Petra and Empire hotels within the Old City.


The number of Palestinian Christians in 1948 was more than 20% out of the total population, since then it has declined to 10% in 1967 and 2% today. This decline has been attributed to the ethnic cleansing of Palestinians in 1948, the occupation and the continuous harassment and humiliation of the Palestinian people in the West Bank, Gaza and Jerusalem.


For information, please contact:
Nadia Awad, GMC, 00972 54 534 9671
Xavier Abu Eid, NSU, 00970 598 950 300
Father Firas Areedah (available for interviews) 00970 599 325 957
Yusef Daher, Jerusalem Inter-Church Centre 00972 50 554 5179

http://www.christatthecheckpoint.com
http://www.pcpj.org/
http://www.kairospalestine.ps
http://www.bethlehemaffirmation.com/

Saudi Court Postpones Execution of Levantine Sorcerer

Lebanese Sorcerer condemned to death by Saudi Court will be post-postponed for now.

Until he was arrested in 2008 while on a pilgrimage in Saudi Arabia, Ali Sabat was the host of a satellite television program in which he promised to give “advice and predictions about the future,” to callers from around the Arab world to his studio in Beirut, as Britain’s Channel 4 News explained in a report on his case on Thursday. (That report, embedded above, includes scenes from Mr. Sabat’s show and of his televised confession which was broadcast in Saudi Arabia.)


Link to original...

Accused Indian Priest Returned to USA to Face Charges

More authority is needed. May I recommend restoring the Papal States and perhaps arming the Papacy with Nuclear Weapons?

Link to original...

Gomez holds both conservative and progressive views - latimes.com

The various antediluvian reptiles who inhabit the halls of the major propaganda organs in the United States have been reeling from the effects of new technology on their media as circulations have dropped almost 10% in the last 6 months in all major papers.

Arguably, there are advances, perhaps unforseen by Marx, which are undermining their nearly unquestioned authority and unshakeable faith in irreligion, central command economies and the essential goodness of government.

Post-modern man can now make his own news and the horse and buggy of the Los Angeles Times is quickly losing pace with the instantaneous reach of the common man and his computer.

Gomez holds both conservative and progressive views - latimes.com

Posted using ShareThis

Legal Eagles or Opportunistic Buzzards?



Dante's Inferno contains a place just outside of Hell for Opportunists, men who avoided life's choices between good and evil and earned the contempt of both Hell and heaven. A conventional definition of the term, however, presents us with a more active declaration of evil in that opportunists are unprincipled people, often politicians, who pursue goals without respect to principle, without respect to good or evil. Indeed, St. Thomas Aquinas once said that "The hottest places in hell are reserved for those who, in time of great moral crisis, maintain their neutrality."

What can be said of Communists is that they make use of witting or unwitting soft-hearted and soft-headed men who believe that they are serving the greater good by working with them.

The American Civil Liberties Union, to which Jeff Anderson belongs, has long made a Crusade of its own attacking the appearance of Religion in public life wherever it can be found, and makes common cause in defense of perniciousness in society, while attacking the aemeliorating balm of Religion. They rather make a virtue of a vice and will trample every principle to defend the deliterious and crush the Church with calumnies, but insisting,conveniently, that there is no good or evil and that religion is solely at best a personal choice, at worst a severe debilitating delusion barring one (and perhaps one's surrounding society) from mental health, which should, therefore, not be shown any preferential treatement by the government or its representatives. Beneath all the rhetoric of neutrality and fairness ACLU maintains, it is never the less an organization poised with deliberate hostility and malice towards religion and particularly the Catholic Church.

Unfortunately, you won't read about this in the LA Times.

If ever there was justification for unleashing the law's hounds of hell, complicity in harming a child is it. Few are sympathizing with the church hierarchy who looked the other way from the pedophilia and pederasty in their midst. But it is the faithful who are being asked to pay millions for the sins of the fathers, and innocent children who must bear the scars. [Again, failure to put the blame where it belongs] So INSIGHT recently found two of the most active advocates to square off in separate interviews on the issue of the more than 200 sexual-abuse lawsuits targeting the Roman Catholic Church in the United States.

The legal fallout from the sexual-abuse scandals currently threatening Catholic archdioceses around the country soon may be large enough to bankrupt them. And the frenzy shows little sign of abating--next in the crosshairs as these scandals grow, say critics, will be the Protestant churches.

"I brought one of the first cases in the U.S. against the Catholic Church involving child sexual molestation" Minnesota attorney Jeffrey Anderson of Reinhardt and Anderson tells INSIGHT. "Since that time [1983] I've handled over 1,000 cases of child sexual molestation by various religious organizations. Over 600 of them were Catholic clergy." [It has long been a tactic of Communists to back a cause that people unsympathetic to dialectical materialism can get behind.]


Link to original...

A vast sex and money scandal threatens the Vatican. But, once again, Ratzinger emerges as the campaigner against 'filth'

Legionaires couldn't buy off Ratzinger. He saw through their mask of orthodoxy. h/t: young fogey

A vast sex and money scandal threatens the Vatican. But, once again, Ratzinger emerges as the campaigner against 'filth'

Tuesday, April 6, 2010

Vatican Blasts Anti-Catholic Campaign

VATICAN CITY— The Vatican heatedly defended Pope Benedict XVI on Tuesday, claiming accusations that he helped cover up the actions of pedophile priests are part of an anti-Catholic "hate" campaign targeting the pope for his opposition to abortion and same-sex marriage.

Vatican Radio broadcast comments by two senior cardinals explaining "the motive for these attacks" on the pope and the Vatican newspaper chipped in with spirited comments from another top cardinal.

"The pope defends life and the family, based on marriage between a man and a woman, in a world in which powerful lobbies would like to impose a completely different" agenda, Spanish Cardinal Julian Herranz, head of the disciplinary commission for Holy See officials, said on the radio.

http://www.rr.com/news/topic/article/rr/9000/10882689/Vatican_blasts_anti-Catholic_hate_campaign

The Gay Sex Abuse Coverup

April 5, 2010


Catholic League president Bill Donohue comments on two news stories released today by the Associated Press:

[Catholic League]One of the AP stories on priestly sexual abuse admits that "The overwhelming majority of the victims were adolescents. That means very few guilty priests were pedophiles, a term mental health professionals reserve for those who target pre-pubescent children." Fine. But then it says something which is positively remarkable: "Even though about 80 percent of victims were boys, the John Jay researchers and other experts on sex offenders say it does not mean the perpetrators were gay." So what would they be? Heterosexual?

The AP article relied on the extraordinary remark by Margaret Smith, a professor who worked on the John Jay study. She said that while Donohue "quoted the study's data correctly," I nonetheless "drew an unwarranted conclusion." What? That most of the molesters have been gay? Here is what she said: "The majority of the abusive acts were homosexual in nature. That participation in homosexual acts is not the same as sexual identity as a gay man." So if two men sodomize each other, no one really knows if this qualifies as gay sex. Now I must admit that when I was studying for my doctorate in sociology at NYU, they never taught me such logic.

Both AP stories say the reason why there were so many male victims is because the priests did not have access to girls as altar servers. Nonsense. There have been girl altar servers in some U.S. dioceses since 1983, and almost everywhere since 1994. The statistics actually show that the more priests have access to girls, the less likely it is for girls to be abused.

Here's the tally. As reported in 2004, between 1950 and 2002, 81 percent of the victims were male; in 2005, it stayed the same; in 2006, it dropped to 80 percent; in 2007, it climbed to 82 percent; in 2008, it jumped to 84 percent; and in 2009, it stayed at 84 percent.

In other words, even though priests have less access to males, homosexual priests are molesting them at a higher rate. It's time to end the gay cover-up once and for all.

Read further...

Buchanan: Anti-Catholicism and the Times

"Now we learn the sickening news that Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, nicknamed 'God's Rotweiler,' when he was the church's enforcer on matters of faith and sin, ignored repeated warnings and looked away in the case of the Rev. Lawrence C. Murphy, a Wisconsin priest who molested as many as 200 deaf boys."

In Goodstein's piece, Weakland is a prelate who acted too slowly. The controversy over his clouded departure from the Milwaukee archdiocese is mentioned and passed over at the bottom of the story. It belonged higher.

For Weakland was a homosexual who confessed in a 1980 letter he was in "deep love" with a male paramour who shook down the archbishop for $450,000 in church funds as hush money to keep his lover's mouth shut about their squalid affair.

According to Rod Dreher, Weakland moved Father William Effinger, who would die in prison, from parish to parish, knowing Effinger was a serial pederast.

When one of Effinger's victims sued the archdiocese but lost because of a statute of limitations, Weakland counter-sued and extracted $4,000 from the victim of his predator priest.

Pat Buchanan responds to Abuse Crisis...

St. Stephens is a Parish in Transition: Catholic Tradition Reborn


Many of the members of this troubled inner city parish have left it for the suburbia of protestantism. It's part of an overall transformation going on in the Church where things that haven't worked seem to be getting replaced by things that have always worked, but were ill-used and discarded, like the High Altar that once graced this lovely Neo-Gothic edifice in the midst of post-modern decay and housed Minneapolis' finest and most Catholic families.

Father Williams won't deny it, he's definitely running behind, but Latinos are now making up the difference both in numbers and fervour, where the dwindling Irish and English descendants have mostly left. But Father Williams isn't exactly deterred by this, he's looking for a High Altar. You might think this bodes well for tradition and we'd like to think it does; for Father has trained in the Immemorial Mass of all ages, but says he likes to say the Mass according to the New Rite, however, he's a big fan of JRR Tolkien and has no doubt read Tolkien's thoughts on the matter.

In any event, the Immemorial Mass isn't a preference, nor should it be a cause for division, Father Williams has a very kindly demeanor and suffers fools gladly. He is even liked by his visible opponents who've left the Church to found their own social-justice community nearby. Not to be too naive, but there's hope in this as there is hope in the Catholic Faith, that no matter how terrible things seem, there is a game at play we only dimly understand but will be filled with Joy one day to see it in its fullness when we persevere in the truth.

Father Joseph Williams came to St. Stephen’s in April. “Some people said I was hand-picked by the bishops to dismantle the church. If I was, they didn’t tell me about it.”

By JON TEVLIN, Star Tribune


Father Joseph Williams came "from the farm to the hood" less than a year ago, to a congregation in a spiritual crisis and a neighborhood riddled with poverty and crime. He is only 34, but as he sits in a low-ceilinged office in the basement of St. Stephen's Catholic Church, it seems like the weight of the 110-year-old structure, and the centuries-old institution itself, sit squarely on his shoulders.

When Williams arrived in April, there were 350 families at the church, maybe more. On a recent Sunday, during the only remaining mass in English, coughs echoed off the empty pews as a couple of dozen people mumbled through the service.

That's it, he said.

The rest have fled, or just given up.

Williams, under the direction of a new pope and new archbishop, has steered one of the country's most liberal churches in a more orthodox direction. No more services in the "egalitarian" school gym. No more laity saying mass or celebrating the eucharist. No more prayers to "our father and mother in heaven."

The collection plate is down 90 percent. This spring, the priest who not long ago led a congregation in an idyllic small town, will tell the charter school known for a peace-and-justice curriculum that it must go because the church needs more rent.


Please read further...

What Are Progressives: The Vortex

Upon the Negligence of Pastors

The following reflections are part of an e-mail we received from an annonymous Catholic who has thought long and deeply about the subject and the link he sent from a John Vennari article from 2002:

Well, there is modernist clericalism and a clericalist mentality in the modernist Church. That doesn't explain entirely the molestation crisis. Some people have been suggesting that priests become pedophiles. It's the other way around. The question they need to be asking is why homosexual deviants become priests. Priestly celibacy is not what causes them to molest teenage or young adult males. Vatican II created a new lifestyle and atmosphere in the priesthood which enables and attracts homosexuals. Now, this is a VERY strange and very bizarre phenomenon in abnormal psychology.

I'm not sure that the answers are that clear. But I think it is similar to
why sexual deviants are attracted to professions like police officers, Physical

Education teachers, and sports coaches, Boy Scout leaders.

It gives them a certain power and authority over others.

I also think the perverted voyeurism that they experience in Confession gives a certain aggrandizement and thrill in sadistic power over others. It's a perverse and deviant way of evening the score with heterosexuals. (i.e., getting compromising information on others).

But this whole issue makes me feel nauseated and I have no desire to ever have to deal with the homosexuals and psychologically abnormal modernists in the modernist Church EVER again.

One would also have to reserve some role for the diabolical in this Church crisis. It's not completely caused by clericalism although that can be a part of it. It's why homosexuals have chosen to use the Church as a political arm (and for freeloading) that is the real issue. That's a very complex issue in the area of abnormal psychology.

There is a perversion of deviant, psychoneurotic voyeurism (via Confession) that attracts some homosexuals. One thing you will notice about homosexuals is that they love to gossip (almost like women following soap operas or tabloids). Someone with perverse, deviant, or abnormal sexual hangups will be attracted to Confession in an abnormal way (that a normal priest would not be).
It may also be because blackmail is a part of perverted sexual underworlds. For the sexual pervert, the priesthood is about power.

Entering the priesthood may also be a way to impress the parents. As this secures their support in a way that "coming out" would not (for religious families). Also, it's not that big of a step, as they have already been pretending to be normal in interactions with the parents and other straight Catholics.

So what's really involved? In becoming a priest they are handed the combination to the parish safe, control of the collection plate, etc. Seeing all of that money being collected has been something on their mind FOR YEARS...

The institutional Church has been naive about this problem.


Clerical Scandals and the
"Negligence of the Pastors"


by John Vennari

Note: In light of the recent Church scandals in the news, this article published in 2002 is of even greater relevance.



It is hard to imagine a more distasteful subject than pedophilia and homosexuality in the Roman Catholic priesthood. It is even more disturbing to consider that homosexuals successfully targeted the Catholic Church for infiltration.

Yet these are the issues we are forced to confront at the same time Fatima revisionists claim that the 1984 Consecration of the world fulfilled Our Lady’s request for the Consecration of Russia, and that we are now witnessing the triumph of the Immaculate Heart. If the current state of the Church is an indication of Her triumph, I shudder to think of what would be Her defeat.

Crisis Foretold

In 1981, Father Joaquin Alonso, who had many conversations with Sister Lucy, and who was the official Fatima archivist for sixteen years, said, "It is therefore completely probable that the text (of the Third Secret of Fatima) makes concrete references to the crisis of faith within the Church and to the negligence of the pastors themselves [and the] internal struggles in the very bosom of the Church and of grave pastoral negligence of the upper hierarchy."(1)


Today’s clerical scandals are not because of mandatory celibacy, nor are they because we do not have women priests, married priests, or because there are no laity in Church authority. Rather, they are the result of the "negligence of the pastors" that Father Alonso (pictured above) maintained to be the essence of the Third Secret of Fatima.

The scandals are also the result of what Sister Lucy called the "diabolical disorientation" afflicting "so many persons who occupy places of responsibility" in the Church.(2) As will be demonstrated, the upper hierarchy has been so negligent and disoriented that it presided over a massive influx of homosexuals into the Catholic priesthood and religious orders.

And homosexuality is the real issue.

Most of today’s clerical scandals are not


Read further...

Monday, April 5, 2010

It's Official: Los Angeles Gets Conservative Prelate



Update: As Rorate reports from Vatican Website, here, as we predicted this weekend that Vatican would declare him.

We received the good news over the weekend, according to the good word of Maximilian Hanlon on Saturday afternoon. It was most welcome news that the conservative, Archbishop Gomez, was going to be the next Archbishop of Los Angeles.

Kevin Knight over at New Advent has a New Advent Exclusive up. It's a big picture of His Lordship with a link to the San Antonio Archdiocesan website.

The prodigious announcement of the new Archbishop of Los Angeles who will be Archbishop Gomez, could be made as soon as tomorrow according to Rocco at Whispers in the Loggia. There will be a press conference tomorrow at 10am at the Cathedral in San Antonio.

We hope that the change will take place before Cardinal wreckovates St. Charles Boromeo Cathedral.

It doesn't come as a surprise that Cardinal Mahony was a co-collaborator with radical Cesar Chavez back in the day. He certainly did that for show since he wasn't very kind to his own grave diggers back in the day, but perhaps it's best just to bask in the goodness of this moment now that it is known he is going and will be replaced by someone with a lot more integrity and fervor.