"I would like to say that the relativization of the Council, which allows this Preamble, represents an actual victory for the Society."
|Bishop Fellay © Piusbruderschaft, dici.org|
(kreuz.net) "I can tell you that I personally would have no problem with signing this preamble."
Enrico -- a contributor to the Traditional website 'blog.messainlatino.it' -- affirmed this yesterday.
He refers to the "Dogmatic Preamble", which the Vatican presented to the Priestly Society of St. Pius X for signing.
The Blog Recognizes the Text
The Society General Superior, Msgr Bernard Fellay, is awaiting a canonical proposal since Wednesday.
Enrico commented: "I would like to say that the relativization of the Council, which this Preamble allows, is actually representative of a victory for the Society."
This doesn't constitute a defeat of Rome for him.
Because: "The destruction of the Conciliar "Superdogmas" are put in a win-win situation, from which both can profit."
Enrico summarized the Preamble into two points:
- The Society must respect the Relevance of the Teaching Office.
- The Society must conduct themselves, as they have said, "very respectfully" and collaborate amicably with other parts of the Mystical Body of Christ.
Enrico addressed the concern that the Preamble's expressed requirement for a "religious submission of the understanding and the intellect' for texts of the ordinary Magisterium, could prohibit criticism of the Pastoral Council.
Actually, Enrico pointed to this as a "tremendous novelty".
Because the Preamble allows "the study and the theological clarification of various expressions and ambiguities in the documents of the Second Vatican council and legitimate discussion of the corresponding teaching office."
The Blog informs that this "legitimate discussion" is not only the interpretation of these documents, rather also allows the expression of them: "This clearly goes beyond a mere hermeneutic."
More than mere Hermeneutic
The article recalled the discussion of the former Prefect of the Congregation of Doctrine and the Faith, Joseph Cardinal Ratzinger, to the Chilean Bishops on 13. Juli 1988:
"The truth is that this particular Council defined no dogma and deliberately preferred, to remain as a mere pastoral Council on a humble level.
But many use it as if it were transformed into a kind of Suerpdogma, that robs all other meaning."
And: "It it not tolerated that the Councils decisions may be criticized. While at the same time, if ancient rules or even the principle reality of the Faith -- like the corporal virginity of Mary, the bodily Resurrection of Jesus or the immortality of the soul, there is no criticism or it is protested with great reluctance."
Link to original...