Tuesday, December 19, 2023

False Prophet Enzo Bianchi Founds New Community With Help From Bergoglio


The Madia House, where Enzo Bianchi founded his new "community of Bose".

Edit: wow, Madia house even has solar panels!  How ecological!

One of Pope Francis' strange relationships is that with Enzo Bianchi, the founder of the Community of Bose, who left its foundation in 2020, was removed involuntarily.


The monastic community of the “false prophet”


In 1965, Bianchi founded the (basic) Community of Bose, an ecumenical, monastic lay community of both sexes that did not exist under canon law whose “prior” he called himself. For years the “project” was supported by the Italian Bishops’ Conference. From the beginning of his pontificate, Pope Francis also showed particular sympathy for this progressive flagship project and appointed Bianchi Consultor. Bianchi left no stone unturned to attract attention through provocation. He has done this even more since Francis took office.


He explained that there is “no natural family” because the family form is a product of society that Jesus said nothing about homosexuality, which is why the Church should remain silent about the fact that Fatima is a “hoax” is because “no credible God” is presented there, that Mary is “not a suitable role model for women” because it is associated with “unrealistic” demands and after the publication of Francis' eco-encyclical, Bianchi declared that there was, in a sense, a new Eleventh Commandment, namely “Love the earth as yourself “. In Bose there was already speculation about the actual abolition of the papacy.


Bose's community before the dispute broke out

In 2017, Bianchi, who was then approaching his 75th birthday, relinquished leadership of the Bose Community and appointed a new “prior” named Luciano Manicardi. However, Bianchi apparently imagined this change in such a way that he would still have sole say. This quickly led to internal conflicts and the formation of opposing camps. His successor wanted to have the community recognized under canon law and thus bring it into a regulated form. But Bianchi had always rejected that and continued to try to prevent it. He valued the “freedom of fools,” as a Roman canonist put it.


In order to change the mind of Bianchi, the false monk, false prior and false prophet, his Bose “project” was praised to all heavens and the proposal was put forward to make him a cardinal. He would become the first layman in the history of the College of Cardinals. Cardinals were originally deacons, priests or bishops, as is still expressed today in the three classes of the church senate, but never laymen. Today they are all bishops.


Alternatively, bishops discussed the possibility of ordaining Bianchi as a priest. Because Bianchi refused all flattery, it came to an ordeal that seemed impossible to solve without “patricide.” Serious mutual accusations and insinuations followed. It was about forgery of documents and something even more serious. All disputes revolved around questions of external form and therefore remained on the surface. It was never about questions of the content of the doctrine and Bianchi's heterodox views. Why not? Because everyone obviously agreed on this, including Rome.


The Roman intervention


In order not to let the progressive masterpiece sink in the disrepute, but to save it in time, the Holy See intervened and ordered Bianchi to leave the community.


Was this the overdue rejection of the “false prophet” from Bose? Not at all. Despite the request, nothing happened for a year. Bianchi's departure was not completed until 2021. On February 8th, the Pontifical Delegate ad nutum Sanctae Sedis, the Canossian Amedeo Cencini, appointed by Francis for the monastic community, issued a decree that he also consciously accepted. This was made public in order to increase the pressure on Bianchi. The “former prior,” as it says, had to leave Bose within a week and retreat to the former monastery of Cellole in San Gimignano. The Pope, to whom the decree was presented by Secretary of State Pietro Parolin in the sacristy of St. Peter's Basilica, approved it without even looking at it, saying: “Yes, yes, I approve”.


Father Cencini, just in passing, boasts that as the Pope's “executioner”, i.e. commissioner or delegate, he has closed more communities than kept them open. In Lombardy he is called in when seminarians are suspected of being homosexual, which naturally outrages homophile church circles per se. There are no statements available about his approach and decisions in the matter.

Enzi Bianchi with his “spiritual son” Pope Francis (archive photo)

Janus-faced approach?


Francis had also expressly approved the decree for Bianchi's removal, but at the same time he was pursuing his own “accompanying measures”. On February 9th, the Pope wrote a letter to the “false prophet”, which effectively reached him at the same time as the decree. In it, Francis effusively declared himself to be a “spiritual son” of the founder of the Community of Bose. It was the former dean of the Faculty of Philosophy of the Pontifical Lateran University Msgr. Antonio Livi, the editor of the collected works of Cardinal Giuseppe Siri, who had criticized Bianchi as a “false prophet.” Francis is a “spiritual son” of the “false prophet”?


The papal letter was intended to make it easier for Bianchi to leave. Francis pathetically compared Bianchi's situation to that of the Lord on the Cross. In this situation there is only “darkness”; you only have “three or four friends” who “cannot save” you. All that remains is “obedience, like that of Jesus”.


Francis had sent his delegate to nail Bianchi “to the cross” in order to stick to the image used by the Pope, but at the same time assured Bianchi of his personal closeness and friendship. It was as if Francis was telling him, there are inescapably dark forces at work in the Vatican, but I will secretly help you. A dialectical highlight or villain?


Is there a substantive discussion of Bianchi’s “teachings” in the writing? Not in the slightest.

Almost three years have passed since then. The Vatican seems to have had few concrete ideas about what should happen to Bianchi and the four loyal followers who had to leave Bose with him. However, Francis and Bianchi maintained frequent correspondence during this time. Francis asked several times about the health of Bianchi, now 80 years old, who had to undergo two heart operations last year. Francis also expressed his wish to meet Bianchi in person again.


Last Saturday, December 16th, the time had come. Bianchi came to Santa Marta and was blessed by Francis. He also gave the papal blessing to the Madia House, Bianchi's new project. Francis also continued the dialectical game from the beginning of 2021 by appearing surprised by the State Secretariat's measures.


Incidentally, Francis does not seem to see or quickly forget the wounds that he himself inflicts.


With the Madia House, a second Bose is being created


After several stops, each directed by the State Secretariat, Enzo Bianchi and his four companions reached Albiano d'Ivrea, a small community at the foot of the Alps, around 50 kilometers north of Turin, in the spring. There he founded a “second Bose” in an agricultural building, again as a monastic community, but without canonical recognition. He explained to the daily newspaper La Stampa:

“I am not founding a canonically recognized community, but I want to be a coenobitic monk and not live as a Hermit.”

Enzo Bianchi in the parish church of Albiano d'Ivrea in the monk's dress he created at the presentation of the Madia House in August 2022

As a result of the disputes and Bianchi's removal, the number of members in Bose has fallen dramatically. Without the “guru” the community was no longer the same for many people. Instead, Bianchi is building a new “Bose” with Madia House. The buildings have been largely prepared so that he can invite anyone who wants to live in a community to join him.


Madia, pronounced Màdia, from Latin magida, means baking trough in Italian. Madia House can therefore be translated as a house where bread is prepared.


Through the reception by Pope Francis on Saturday, Enzo Bianchi was rehabilitated by his “spiritual son”, not formally but in fact, just as Francis likes it. The Pope encouraged Bianchi to build his “second evil.” This should also ensure the continued influx of “brothers” and “sisters”.


Bianchi can live out his final days in “brotherly community”. So much for lifestyle. However, it is doubtful that Bianchi was urged by Francis to stop acting as a “false prophet”.

The “new Bose”, the house chapel in the old Camadio estate, which has been converted into the Casa della Madia.

Text: Giuseppe Nardi
Image: Facebook/Youtube/VaticanMedia

Trans: Tancred vekron99@hotmail.com

AMDG

Clot Factor

Edit: one good thing about the vaxx is that it poisons people like Gaybrielle and Marcy Shea.

Now, for those of you, like de Mattei, who foolishly swallowed the lies and received a death vaxx, there’s
still hope.



 AMDG

Monday, December 18, 2023

Fiducia supplicans — Supply Them With Food and Drink For Thought

Father Jack will see to you lot.

Edit: some commentators, like Deacon and FatherZ are deeply and justifiably concerned about the aberrosexual activism inherent in this latest Bergogliade of Fiducia supplicans.

My hot take, inspired after thinking about FatherZ’s post, is that a minister asked to perform an Aberroblessing can use this as an opportunity for corrective action. After meeting with the aberrocouple or aberrothrupple (don’t judge!) in the rectory, offer the buggers some Turkish delight and a nice anisette, preferably a decent, refreshing Absinthe or on cold days, a Hot Toddie. Then get down to business and offer them a document to sign, and then quietly explain that the blessing is conditional upon a GOOD confession, stern penance, and a resolution to amend their lives. They should know the seriousness of their crimes, and realize that the wages of sin is death. Then proceed to the blessing, and maybe even an exorcism eventually, if you can get the diocesan exorcist to take stock.

 

Hopefully, your rectory has one of these


 

This is what that kind of thing leads to

AMDG

Ireland under attack

Sunday, December 17, 2023

Suspension of Ordinations in Fréjus-Toulon Has Been Suspended


Msgr. François Touvet, the new coadjutor of Bishop Dominique Rey in Fréjus-Toulon, announced at the end of the inaugural Mass that he would soon admit some candidates to the Holy Orders.

The Diocese of Fréjus-Toulon, France, has been in the unwanted spotlight in recent years. In mid-2022, Pope Francis surprisingly suspended all ordinations in the diocese. Then Bishop Dominique Rey became the object of one of the now infamous Apostolic Visitations. And recently, Francis provided him with a coadjutor with the right of succession. Yesterday the coadjutor took office.


The disempowerment of the tradition-friendly Bishop Rey is almost complete. The coadjutor, Msgr. François Touvet, announced yesterday, at the end of the Mass for his inauguration, on behalf of Cardinal Lazarus You Heung Sik, Prefect of the Roman Clergy Dicastery, that the decree prohibiting ordination issued by Rome on April 28, 2022, has now been repealed.


The humiliation for Bishop Rey is now complete. It was held under the noses of all the priests and faithful of the diocese that for Rome alone diocesan Bishop Rey was unsuitable to make decisions about the admission of candidates to be ordained. With the day the coadjutor takes office, everything is "good" again.


The announcement is, of course, good news for the diocese, the diocesan seminary and especially for the candidates for ordination, some of whom have had to wait for a year and a half.


It is said that Msgr. Touvet will soon admit several candidates for diaconate and priestly ordination. A first consecration is scheduled for Sunday 21 January 2024 in the cathedral of Toulon. The further timetable has not yet been determined.


It remains to be seen how many and which of the candidates Msgr. Touvet will admit to the ordinations. While the impression of a normalization is conveyed to the outside world, the question of approval continues to be a burdensome one. It is to be expected that some candidates for ordination, called "indietrists" by Rome, will not be admitted in the coming years, and even more so that they will not be admitted at all. Operation Fréjus-Toulon had certain objectives, most notably the removal of Bishop Rey from power, but not only.


It is becoming apparent that the undesirable candidates are not to be dismissed, but to be worn down. You want them to give up themselves. Should they go in search of a more generous ordained minister than Monsignor Touvet will be, they will face obstacles and difficulties. If we follow the script of the current pontificate, the situation will be as follows: if unwanted candidates do not leave the field themselves, they will be encouraged to look for another bishop in another diocese who is willing to receive them, while at the same time pressure will be put on this bishop with a serious warning to turn away knocking candidates from Fréjus-Toulon.


The candidates will need patience and grace and the prayers of the faithful.


Text: Giuseppe Nardi
Image: Youtube (Screenshot)

Trans: Tancred vekron99@hotmail.com

AMDG

Friday, December 15, 2023

Canadian Journalist Who Recommended KZs for Vaccine Dissidents Dead at 33

[Hal Turner Show] A Journalist who advocated that those who were unvaccinated against COVID-19 be put in concentration camps, has died suddenly at the young age of 33. 

 Ian Vandaelle died after being hospitalized and "declared neurologically dead,” his family revealed. Vandaelle was a business journalist who worked as a reporter and editor at the Financial Post. 

 He was also previously a producer at BNN Bloomberg for over a decade. Vandaelle advocated for vaccine passports and mandates and called for the firing of anyone who refused the injections. 

 He also suggested that unvaccinated people should be arrested and taken away to concentration camps.

AMDG

Man Cuts Head off Satanic Statue in State Capital

Edit: as long as we’re on the subject of heroic men doing what needs to be done in the face of Satanic organizations, Michael Cassidy is taking responsibility for the act.  As bad as the United States is, self-proclaimed Satanists don’t have a lot of social capital, but I’m sure that the SPLC or some other covertly satanist organization will step in to ensure that “Freedom of Religion” is held sacrosanct. 

 


Meanwhile, at an institution controlled by Jews, you can’t even display a Menorah at night for fear of vandalism. Note that there’s a rabbi on call to explain everything that should be done. He does everything well!

Hey Rabbi, Whatchadoin?

https://nypost.com/2023/12/14/news/harvard-forces-jewish-student-group-to-hide-menorah-at-night-for-fear-of-vandalism-rabbi-says/


[New York Post] Harvard forces a Jewish student group to hide its menorah each night after its lighting over fears of vandalism that “won’t look good” for the Ivy League school, the rabbi of Harvard Chabad said. 

“On our campus in the shadow of Widener Library, we in the Jewish community are instructed, ‘We’ll let you have the menorah, you made your point, OK. Pack it up, don’t leave it out overnight because there will be criminal activity we fear and it won’t look good’,” Rabbi Hirschy Zarchi said at a Hanukkah lighting Wednesday night. 

AMDG


Wednesday, December 13, 2023

How the itching ears of Taylor & Thug enabled Voris' relapse.

Polish Statesman Extinguishes Hanukkah Candles in Parliament


Edit: Grzegorz Braun said, after the event, “Those who take part in acts of satanic worship should be ashamed.”

At last, a “far-right” politician who isn’t under their control.  

WARSAW, Dec 12 (Reuters) - A far-right Polish lawmaker used a fire extinguisher to put out Hanukkah candles in the country's parliament on Tuesday during an event with members of the Jewish community, provoking outrage and leading the speaker to exclude him from the sitting.

The disruption came ahead of a key vote on whether to approve newly appointed pro-EU prime minister Donald Tusk.

Footage posted on the website of private broadcaster TVN24 showed Grzegorz Braun of the Confederation party take the extinguisher before walking across the lobby of the parliament to where the candles were, creating a white cloud and forcing security guards to rush people out of the area.


AMDG

Diary of a Psychosis

 

Sunday, December 10, 2023

Saturday, December 9, 2023

Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò Attacks Hermeneutic of Continuity


Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò demands an admission that the attempt at a hermeneutic of continuity has failed.

(Rome) Is Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò heading for a schism? The well-known Vaticanist Sandro Magister sees this danger. Nothing would please the papal entourage and the hard-core progressives in the Church more than such a move.


Archbishop Viganò, Vatican diplomat, out of service since 2016, had most recently served as apostolic nuncio to the United States for five years. There is no more important post in the diplomatic corps. Pope Benedict XVI had sent him to Washington. However, he achieved international fame without ever taking the step into the big spotlight under Pope Francis, when he became his most famous and radical accuser. The top diplomat was accustomed to working in the background with the precise and deliberate language of diplomacy. But at the end of August 2018, his collar burst.


The first review in 2018


When the New York Times exposed the homosexual double life of Theodore McCarrick, then a cardinal, and allegations of sexual abuse of children and adolescents, including the homosexual corruption of his own seminarians, Pope Francis reacted quickly and stripped the cardinal of his purple dignity. Such a move was unprecedented in past centuries.


At the same time, the Church leader assured the public that he had known nothing about McCarrick's vices, otherwise he would have acted immediately and much earlier. This self-exculpation had outraged Msgr. Viganò. In a dossier, he accused Francis of untruth and revealed that he had already informed the then newly elected pope in detail in June 2013 about McCarrick's double life, who was therefore sanctioned by Pope Benedict XVI, although the full extent of the life of vice was not even known at the time. Francis, on the other hand, rehabilitated McCarrick and opened him access to papal power in a way that the U.S. cardinal had never had before. McCarrick was particularly influential in the appointment of bishops in the United States. In 2018, this was to lead to the additional accusation of having supported and strengthened a homophile network.


The Viganò dossier hit like a bombshell. The secular media was momentarily irritated. The sensation appealed to them too much. However, this was opposed by the prescribed self-discipline that protects Pope Francis – in contrast to his two predecessors. The papal entourage was furious. Under a mudslide, Archbishop Viganó seemed to be buried and swept away, but the Vatican diplomat showed remarkable steadfastness. To be on the safe side, however, he began to keep his whereabouts a secret. He also defended his move to the public against those non-progressive parts of the Church who fundamentally consider criticism of the Pope to be disreputable. The facts he mentioned were confirmed. In two additions, Msgr. Viganò added further details to the evidence, also giving exact dates and names. Most notably, he exposed part of the episcopal gay network in the U.S. and the Vatican.


He was silent. The great defendant, Pope Francis, was also silent. To date, he has not commented, or only marginally, on the serious accusations of his former top diplomat. The Holy See was attentive to the fact that the left-liberal secular media, which set the tone, kept up the protective dam around Francis. Once that was secured, they could easily ignore the matter themselves.


The Warning of a New World Order


But that's not all. Archbishop Viganò, a lawyer and diplomat accustomed to precise thinking, has repeatedly spoken out over the past 22 months and has also supported some initiatives critical of the Pope. Last January, he surprisingly took part in the Acies ordinata of traditional circles in Munich to protest against the schismatizing and heretical synodal path of the German Bishops' Conference and the Central Committee of German Catholics (ZdK). In May, for the first time, he initiated an action called Veritas liberabit vos (The truth will set you free) that sharply criticized the restrictive measures taken by numerous governments in connection with the coronavirus. Above all, it warned that there are forces that want to use the virus as a pretext to achieve a political agenda for the establishment of a new world order, bypassing the current constitutional order and democratic decision-making processes.


In this case, too, there was an astonished aha moment in the major world media and once again the Viganò initiative was quickly swept under the carpet. This time, too, the diplomat had apparently presented a text that was far too "dangerous" to be made available to the public unfiltered or at all. Rarely has it been more evident in recent years how massively and perfectly the leading media exercise the control of public opinion through filters and barriers. At the same time, the appeal Veritas liberabit vos was also signed by several cardinals, which in itself is already a sensation. In the Corona crisis, no document as important as this criticism has been published beyond medical statements. No wonder it is hushed up.


In the papal environment and among convinced Bergoglians, the rumor has been spread since the late summer of 2018 that Archbishop Viganò is no longer in unity with the Pope, that he has become a schismatic. This was not just a conviction that some people really cherished. There was another reason: nothing would be more convenient. The Viganò case would be settled in one fell swoop. No progressive, nor even Rome, would have to justify himself to a schismatic. The matter could be filed without Pope Francis, for example, having to comment on the accusations put on paper two years ago. On August 26, 2018, Archbishop Viganò had demanded nothing less than the resignation of Francis in his dossier.


The statements on Benedict XVI.


In fact, Msgr. Viganò, endowed with his authority and rank, formulates a position in the Church that latently embraces considerably more circles in the clergy and among the faithful than some think, but which has hardly been articulated so openly and pointedly in recent times. 20 days ago, the archbishop also objected to a central point of the pontificate of Benedict XVI.


The German Pope, who had just spent a few days with his brother in Regensburg and had left the Vatican for the first time since his retirement to the monastery in the Vatican Gardens, attempted a course correction of the greatest magnitude during his term of office. He wanted to correct the reading of the Second Vatican Council, which had dominated everything for 50 years. He articulated this goal in 2005, at his first Christmas reception for the Roman Curia, in a great speech. It is about the liturgy, theology and the understanding of the Church itself. Ultimately, it is about the entire life of the Church beyond personal piety.

The post-conciliar period was dominated by the hermeneutic of rupture. Benedict XVI tried to counter it with a hermeneutic of continuity. By reading the conciliar documents in the light of the tradition of the Church's two-thousand-year history, the ruptures and their mentality should be overcome. It was not only the guardians of the hermeneutic of rupture and the ecclesiastical '68ers who resisted this by boycotting and sabotaging Benedict's pontificate wherever possible. On the other hand, doubts were also expressed by those close to tradition as to whether all the statements of the Council, even the most controversial ones, could actually be reconciled with tradition. This site also postulated a hermeneutic of rupture in the spirit of Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre. During the pontificate of Benedict XVI, this criticism rarely went beyond the articulation of concerns, as the fundamental agreement with the German head of the Church remained dominant. Under Francis, that consensus quickly faded. The traditional shyness of criticism of the Pope, which is characteristic of faithful Church circles and is understood as an award, developed some cracks the more unpredictable the new Church leader from Argentina showed himself and the more irritating certain statements and actions appeared.


Archbishop Viganò responded on June 9 to a statement by Auxiliary Bishop Athanasius Schneider published on LifeSiteNews, speaking of a "monstrosity" created by modernist circles through the Second Vatican Council. He also made some observations concerning the pontificate of Benedict XVI, who "betrayed" the Church with his hermeneutic of continuity. The German pope had even strengthened the modernists' thesis that the Second Vatican Council was immune to heresies. It is enough, this is the difference from the hermeneutics of the rupture, to read the Council "in perfect continuity with the true doctrine of all times," Sandro Magister concluded. Archbishop Viganò counters that there are statements in conciliar documents that are so ambiguous that they cannot be reconciled with Tradition. Therefore, the hermeneutics of continuity does not go far enough.


"Drop Dignitatis humanae in toto"


Archbishop Viganò's statements have become more accentuated over the past few months. More and more clearly, he called a spade a spade, where until now they had been hinted at at best. Most recently, this happened in a public exchange of blows with Phil Lawler, author of Lost Shepherd, a book critical of Francis' pontificate.


The criticism of controversial conciliar texts is "too timid," said Msgr. Viganò. Not everything can be corrected by correcting a few words. This is especially true of the document Dignitatis humanae on religious freedom. Magister summarizes the archbishop's demands as follows, quoting him:


"To do what needs to be done once and for all is to 'drop it in toto and forget it.'"


Consequently, according to Msgr. Viganò, those who are guilty of false theology should also be chased out of office, unless they show insight and convert.

The matter is very serious, the Apostolic Nuncio said calmly, because since the Council the nature of the Church has been distorted by striving for a new "world unity religion", whose inventor and first theoretician is "Freemasonry". The political arm of this new world religion is a "world government out of control" as sought by powerful secular forces. It is against these forces and their goals that the appeal Veritas liberabit vos and the letter of Msgr. Viganò to US President Donald Trump, whom he described as a fighter of light in the fight against the forces of darkness, are directed. Trump responded enthusiastically with a tweet that was circulated worldwide on social networks.


The latest move by the pugnacious archbishop is the accusation against Benedict XVI of having failed with his too timid attempts to make the necessary corrections to the Second Vatican Council. His thesis of a hermeneutic of continuity had turned out to be insufficiently profound, but also impracticable in some respects. This, too, is an admission that is necessary if the necessary course is to be set.


The question remains whether Magister's sensors reported a false alarm or whether his advance warning system is accurate and reacts particularly finely by trying to recognize Archbishop Viganò's path to schism in this latest criticism, which also hits Benedict XVI. The fact remains that nothing better could have happened to Santa Marta.


Text: Giuseppe Nardi
Image: Voice of the Family/MiL (Screenshot)

Trans: Tancred vekron99@hotmail.Com

AMDG

Pilot Seizure Nearly Crashes American 787

 Edit: sure, take the jab and end your career, maybe put your passengers at risk.

Meanwhile, MSM and Gaybrielle bots frantically attempt to prop up the scam.


AMDG