Bishop of Frejus-Toulon is Being Railroaded by Bergoglian Hatchetmen
Edit: as predicted. What took them so long?
AMDG
4 comments:
Anonymous
said...
The bishop does not know that Vatican Council II ( rational ) supports the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and the rest of Trdaition. It is Pope Francis who justifies his liberalism with Vatican Council II interpreted irrrationally- this is also the sad interpretation of Vatican Council II by the French bishops and cardinals. -Lionel Andrades
The investigation was on for a long time. A spokesman for the bishop or Una Voce or the Latin Mass societies should have announced that :- 1. Vatican Council II supports the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus ( with no exceptions), the Athanasius Creed ( with no exceptions) and the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX with no known exceptons for an ecumenism of return. So the Council has a continuity with Tradition including the exclusvist ecclesiology of the Roman Missal of the 16th century. The Council is aid for Bishop Rey and not the investigators who affirm Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church interpreted only irrationally to produce innovation in the Church. The exclusivist ecclesiology of Vatican Council II, rational, must be the standard and traditional ecclesiology of the Catholic Church even at the Novus Ordo Masss in France. Also visitations must affirm Church Documents interpreted only rationally.Irrational interpretations are not Magisterial. Bishop Dominique Rey was not obliged to welcome apostolic visitors who interpret Magisterial Documents in a non apostolic way. This should have been made clear a long time by traditionalist websites. So doctrinally and theologically it is Pope Francis and the liberal cardinals who are on the defensive.They can no more support their liberalism in faith and morals, with Vatican Council II interpreted irrationally. -Lionel Andrades
4 comments:
The bishop does not know that Vatican Council II ( rational ) supports the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and the rest of Trdaition. It is Pope Francis who justifies his liberalism with Vatican Council II interpreted irrrationally- this is also the sad interpretation of Vatican Council II by the French bishops and cardinals.
-Lionel Andrades
Nobody is as clued-in as you are.
Well, Bergoglio is a Jew, they all hate actual Catholics.
The investigation was on for a long time.
A spokesman for the bishop or Una Voce or the Latin Mass societies should have announced that :-
1. Vatican Council II supports the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus ( with no exceptions), the Athanasius Creed ( with no exceptions) and the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX with no known exceptons for an ecumenism of return. So the Council has a continuity with Tradition including the exclusvist ecclesiology of the Roman Missal of the 16th century. The Council is aid for Bishop Rey and not the investigators who affirm Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church interpreted only irrationally to produce innovation in the Church.
The exclusivist ecclesiology of Vatican Council II, rational, must be the standard and traditional ecclesiology of the Catholic Church even at the Novus Ordo Masss in France.
Also visitations must affirm Church Documents interpreted only rationally.Irrational interpretations are not Magisterial. Bishop Dominique Rey was not obliged to welcome apostolic visitors who interpret Magisterial Documents in a non apostolic way.
This should have been made clear a long time by traditionalist websites.
So doctrinally and theologically it is Pope Francis and the liberal cardinals who are on the defensive.They can no more support their liberalism in faith and morals, with Vatican Council II interpreted irrationally. -Lionel Andrades
Post a Comment