Monday, August 17, 2020

Vatican II and CIA propaganda

2 comments:

Tancred said...

The CIA was responsible for ugly art, Gloria Steinem and Vatican II?

Catholic Mission said...

The Vatican Ambassadors to the different countries are not announcing that the Catholic Church affirms the strict interpretation of extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) and that LG 8, LG 16, UR 3, NA2, GS 22 etc are not objective exceptions to EENS.The Council is being interpreted without the false premise, is is not announced. This is a reality of Vatican Council II. The Council can be interpreted without the false premise. Instead the Ambassadors are interpreting the Council with the false premise and this is official.
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/08/the-vatican-ambassadors-to-different.html
___________________________

AUGUST 24, 2020
Fr.Rosario Sammarco F.I, Rector, Franciscan Friars of the Immaculate(F.I) seminary,Boccea, Rome does not proclaim the Catholic Faith in public though personally he may agree that there are no phyisically visible exceptions to EENS.Vatican Council II in public is interpreted with the false premise to create an artificial rupture with Tradition.
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/08/frrosario-sammarco-fi-rector-franciscan.html
___________________________
AUGUST 21, 2020
Michael Sean Winters chooses not to interpret Vatican Council II without the false premise and Fr. John Zuhlsdorf does not say anything. Why? Since MSW would ask Fr. Z,"Have you interpreted Vatican Council II without the irrational premise ?" He would have to say No. Otherwise it would mean he affirms the strict interpretation of EENS
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/08/michael-sean-winters-chooses-not-to.html
-Lionel Andrades

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...