Friday, July 18, 2014

Bishop WIlliamson: Rome Agreement With SSPX Here

Agreement here

On December 13 of last year, in St Martha’s House in Rome where the Pope is currently living, the Pope met briefly with Bishop Fellay, Superior General of the Society of St Pius X. The Society officially denies that the meeting had any significance, but an Italian commentator having some familiarity with how Rome operates, one Giacomo Devoto (G.D.), argues that the meeting was proof that a Rome-SSPX agreement has been reached. See . In brief:—

On the morning of the 13th Bishop Fellay and his two Assistants at the head of the SSPX met in the Vatican with the heads of the Ecclesia Dei Commission at the invitation of Monsignor Guido Pozzo, restored to the Commission by Pope Francis to deal with the problematic relations between Rome and the SSPX. An official publication of the SSPX, DICI, claims that this meeting was merely “informal,” but G.D. says that even being informal it cannot have taken place without there having been beforehand a series of discreet contacts to repair the public breach of relations in June of 2012. Also, says G.D., such a meeting is the necessary preliminary to any “formal” meeting.

In any case after that meeting Msgr. Pozzo, Msgr. di Noia and the three heads of the SSPX repaired to St Martha’s House where the Pope also happened to be lunching. When the Pope stood up after the meal to leave, Bishop Fellay went over to him, they exchanged a few words in public view and the Bishop kissed the Pope’s ring (or knelt down for his blessing, according to Rome’s Vatican Insider). DICI again minimised the encounter as nothing more than a chance meeting with a spontaneous exchange of courtesies. On the contrary G.D. reasonably maintains that even such a “chance” encounter cannot have taken place without the Pope’s previous knowledge and approval.

Moreover, says G.D., in the art of diplomacy such a meeting is a finely calculated ice-breaker, of elastic interpretation, designed to mean as much or as little as one wants. On the one hand the courteous contact was there for all to see in a public place frequented by important Newchurch officials, and it could be seen as papal support of whatever had gone on at the morning’s meeting with the Commission. On the other hand both Rome and the SSPX could plausibly deny that the encounter had any real significance beyond an exchange of courtesies.

Thus when rumours began to circulate in the new year, for months the SSPX denied that there was any question of a Rome-SSPX agreement. Only on May 10 did DICI admit that there had been any contact at all between the Pope and Bishop Fellay, and then DICI so minimised the event that G.D. takes it as a sure sign that an agreement has been reached in private. (In modern politics, as the cynical saying goes, nothing can be taken as true until it is officially denied.)

In fact the main problem, for Pope Francis as for Bishop Fellay, is not how to come to an agreement which they both want, but how to get their left and right wings respectively to accept an agreement. However, the problem is being solved for them day by day as the Society, once glorious for its defence of the Faith, becomes the inglorious Newsociety. For indeed how many Newchurch bishops can still be fearing the Newsociety as a threat to their Newchurch? And how many SSPX priests are still convinced that any agreement with Rome would be a disaster, especially if they are promised that “they will need to change nothing”? Such an agreement will hardly need to be announced. In many minds and hearts it is already here.

Kyrie eleison.

Bishop Richard Williamson

Eleison Comments...
And auf Deutsch.


Anonymous said...

There are far more subtle cures than a blunt force trauma to the head.

If SSPX is smart, they will need to play up the antagonism, while accusations of "Crypto-Lefebvrianism" must be discredited without throwing anyone under the bus.

If the SSPX is not feared, then this must be taken advantage of; any change must be subtle; the body heals itself in such a manner, the opposite of how these revolutionaries operate. It is known from history that those who have succeeded in revolution have done so during a time of discontent and weakness. The alternative was to infiltrate and make sure to take over the institutions to the point of victory.

Our Lord did not bring forth victory over Rome by taking on her legions: Rome instead was slowly but surely turning to Christ. The opposite happened when the revolution came. Defenders of Faith became godless, murderous bigamists; pious monks became heretics. Corruption doesn't ignore bishops, popes, or kings; but there should be no loss of hope in bringing down any disease that has crept into the Church because Christ will always be victorious.

Anonymous said...

Why sling mud at people you disagree with? You left the SSPX, why not leave in peace? Focus your energy on something other than criticism.

Joven Amigo said...

For the Good of the Church, i place here a declaration about Mons. Faure that is important to make known. Please note, it is not anonymous. this Priest is giving his personal information to verify the veracity of his words, and that information is Real. Visit the following links:

Por el bien de la Iglesia, colocamos aquí una declaración acerca de Mons. Faure, que es importante hacerla conocer. Por favor, note que no es anónima. Este sacerdote está proporcionando su información personal, para verificar la veracidad de sus palabras, y esta información es Real. Visite los links que aparecen arriba.

For any comments / para sus comentarios :

Anonymous said...

That's not the Dennis Seymour I've seen!