Edit: Does anyone think any of these catamites arrayed in their immodest outfits, as if for a triumphalisticn rainbow parade, have any intention to amend their lives? Did the sinful woman come to Christ proudly attired as a prostitute with no intention to reform her life? It looks like they're agitating for Globohomo to us.
[Gloria.tv] Francis supported again the about 30 male transvestite prostitutes” of Torvaianica, Rome, whom the Italian Francis media call coyly with the English term "sex workers."
Francis sent a Vatican ambulance to provide the prostitutes with free Covid-19 tests and free flu vaccinations.
This initiative was initiated by the local parish-priest, Father Andrea Conocchia who complained with the papal almoner, Cardinal Krajewski, that the prostitutes could "no longer work" and were living in fear because they didn't know whether the "few remaining customers" were healthy.
In August 2016, Francis wrote in a prologue of a book by Father Aldo Buonaiuto that prostitution is a "horrendous crime" and that "any form of prostitution is a reduction to slavery, a criminal act, a disgusting vice that confuses making love with venting out one's instincts."
In April 2020, Francis offered money to the Torvaianica prostitutes.
Pope Francis surprisingly visited the Marian Column on Spanish Square yesterday with a "semi-clandestine" action.
(Rome) Pope Francis made two program changes within a short period of time. Both are justified with the corona virus, although they lack consistency.
Just before the recent Cardinal naming became known, first, Pope Francis was to go directly from Santa Marta this year on December 8, not to make the traditional homage to the Mother of God on the Spanish Steps. The reason given was the corona situation. Shortly afterwards, the Vatican press office announced a shortened version of this Marian honor on video, always with the same reason: The Corona situation does not allow any gatherings.
The head of the Church thus received considerable criticism. The homage on this day is one of the few traditional moments of the year when the Pope unites in a special way with the people of Rome. Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò, the former apostolic nuncio in the USA, criticized the papal decision in a comment for the daily Libero. The “indifference of too many bishops towards the Virgin Mary” is painful, all the more so is the rejection of the Pope “of the traditional homage to the Immaculate Conception”.
On yesterday's solemn Feast of the Conception of Mary, Francis went to the Marian Column in the Piazza di Spagna early in the morning. The Vaticanist Marco Tosatti spoke of a "semi-clandestine" action. Francis hurriedly let himself be driven in front of the Marian Column, appeared there with a face mask, although there was no popular participation and [other reports say he walked there] he said nothing, laid flowers there and hurried away again. No prayer, no union with the believing people, the Tota pulchra es Maria , one of the oldest Marian prayers in Christianity, was neither prayed nor sung. [He later went to Santa Maria Maggiore to say Mass ad orientem.]
It was not the first time, said Tosatti, that Francis behaved “disrespectfully” towards the Blessed Mother. Last year, he named a "Mischling", to strike a bold bow to the today's migration agenda of the political-economic establishment which should lead as Francis sees humanity as affirmative, in a "Mestizentum".
Tosatti does not accept the reason for the program change:
"If Bergoglio truly fears the risk factor of crowds for Corona infections, why did he take part in the international October 20 Interreligious Meeting at the Community of Sant'Egidio, also in the State House, meeting 'representatives religions and of politics, including Italy's President, the Freemason Sergio Mattarella in the spirit of Assisi? "
After all foreign trips have been canceled, Pope Francis travels to Iraq
In early September, when the corona situation was much less dramatic, according to government data than is currently being claimed, Santa Marta let it be known that Pope Francis will undertake no foreign ravel in 2021. This unusual decision was also justified with the coronavirus.
While the governments of Italy and other states are regulating the upcoming Christmas season with ever stricter measures - in Italy people are not allowed to leave their region, on December 25th and 26th, Christmas Day and St. Stephen's Day, they will not even be allowed to leave their community - Vatican spokesman Matteo Bruni (Community of Sant'Egidio) informed the stunned public that Pope Francis would visit Iraq in early March 2021. The journey to a land of persecuted Christians is an important event.
It was said that the travel plans took into account the alleged "health emergency" due to the coronavirus, so a cancellation cannot be ruled out, but the two papal decisions do not really fit together: Why was the cancellation first, then an announcement? Why taking part in a politically correct event at the State House, which seemed like a step on the way to a unified world religion, but a “semi-clandestine” homage to the Mother of God upon a genuinely Catholic festival? Why did the “health emergency” at the beginning of September not allow trips abroad for the whole of 2021, but a trip to Iraq at the beginning of December?
Iraq, the central region of what was once Mesopotamia, has long been a fairly stable country. In the past 40 years, however, it has been torn apart by wars, civil war and religious war. It belongs to those predominantly Islamic areas in which the Christians were still a strong minority at the beginning of the 20th century, whereas today they are threatened with extinction.
1200 years of Islamic rule were less fatal for the country's Christianity than the past 100 years since the Anglo-Saxon powers began to interfere there. The numbers speak for themselves: at the beginning of the 20th century, almost 30 percent of today's Iraqis were Christians. Before the first Iraq war in 1980 there were about ten percent, before the second war in Iraq in 2003 still more than five percent.
Open Doors complained in 2013 that there will be "no more Christians" in Iraq in 2020. It didn't turn out that bad, but almost. The end of the Christian community on the Tigris and Euphrates seems only a matter of time. Were before the start of the Obama operation Arab Spring in Iraq (2014), with its appearance of Jihadi Islamic State (IS) or 2.7 percent of the residents Christians today it is not even one percent. The Vatican itself only speaks of 250,000 Christians.
But Francis does not seem to be traveling to Iraq because of the persecuted and shrinking Christian communities. The main motivation is the "dialogue with Islam". Even the Papal Aid Organization Church in Need, which is familiar with the sad fate of the persecuted Christians, names the "strong interreligious signal" as the main keyword of the planned papal trip.
By signing the declaration on the Universal Brotherhood of All People in Abu Dhabi, which was added by enthusiastic Freemasonry, this "dialogue" entered a decisive phase in February of 2019. Pope Francis seems determined to continue on this path, also by taking a trip abroad to Iraq in March 2021, although he actually doesn't want to go abroad in 2021 because of the corona virus.
Or in Santa Marta the right hand doesn't know what the left is doing?
Text: Giuseppe Nardi Image: Avvenire (screenshots)
There are few topics that hit emotional buttons as vaccinations. The internet is awash with pro-vaccines vs anti-vaccines arguments. And if you add in the whole CCP Virus as a background, you have a perfect storm of controversy.
This week’s guest is Dr. Theresa Deisher, who holds a doctorate in Molecular and Cellular Physiology from Stanford University School of Medicine. She is the founder and lead scientist at Sound Choice Pharmaceutical Institute, and the CEO of AVM Biotechnology. Dr. Deisher holds more than 47 issued US/EU/Japan patents and four discoveries in clinical trials and has over 30 years of pharmaceutical leadership experience including Genentech, Repligen, ZymoGenetics, Immunex, and Amgen.
In
1945, the Council on Foreign Relations with the backing of FDR founded the
United Nations with the objective of bringing about a New World Order under a
supreme dictator of evil. The U.N. is the seat of the internationalist octopus
that now seeks to enslave the nations under a communistic one-world government,
known as the “Great Reset.” https://real-agenda.com/in-depth/the-bilderberg-group-origins-and-influence/
Eerily, Pope Francis in 2015 said, “There is urgent need of a true world
political authority” (Laudato Si’) and later accentuated this point by saying:
“When we acknowledge
international organizations and we recognize their capacity to give judgment,
on a global scale – for example the international tribunal in The Hague, or the
United Nations – If we consider ourselves humanity, when they make statements,
our duty is to obey … We must obey international institutions. The is why the
United Nations were created.” https://youtu.be/FBOeHudjqGM
Unfortunately, Francis has followed through with this by
“exhorting” the masses to abide by globalist directives to lock down in
response to Coronavirus and has gone so far as to mock those who voice
opposition to the COVID lockdowns. In a recent book-length
interview with
leftist Vatican journalist Austen Ivereigh, Pope Francis lashed out against those who protest
the lockdowns, saying:
“You’ll never find such people protesting the
death of George Floyd, or joining a demonstration because there are shantytowns
where children lack water or education, or because there are whole families who
have lost their income.”
Francis blunders in accusing
COVID demonstrators of having no concern for those who suffer deprivation, since
these objectors are protesting lockdowns through which “whole families have
lost their income,” through which cities have become “shantytowns” lacking
education for the young and where children are deprived of good things like
parks to play in. These poor children can't even get a drink of water at the
local drinking fountain because of all the "red tape" they've wrapped
around them. Why isn’t the pope defending these children?
And why is he
defending George Floyd, a man with a criminal history who threatened to shoot a pregnant woman in the stomach? Because Francis
listens to globalists, not to God. Globalists are tyrants that operate
under the pretext of compassion and these fake stewards of goodness unfortunately
have influenced the pope with their ways.
It indeed appears that
Francis’ design is to subjugate humanity to a “world political authority” under
the guise of mercy. For under the cloak of peace and goodness he backs the notorious
Joe Biden whom globalists are using to spearhead their plan for a tyrannical
world government that targets the unborn. Biden has vowed to remove every restriction to abortion if he
is elected.
Is Francis Fine With Abortion?
Why is the pope backing a corrupt and fraudulent candidate
who has promised that all Americans will be required to pay for abortion should
he become president? Is Francis OK with abortion?
Let us not forget that Francis has repeatedly invited
U.N. population-control experts like Jeffrey Sachs and Ban Ki moon to lecture the
Vatican concerning our “duty” to help make “mother-earth” a safer place through
population-control (abortion). On
Oct. 28, 2019, the Pontifical Academy of Sciences partnered with U.N.
pro-abortion advocates to pledge fidelity to the antilife Sustainable
Development Goals (SDGs) championed by socialist rebels like George Soros, Bill
Gates, and Jeffrey Sachs.
People like Gates and Sachs are walking demons who
assist the infamous U.N. in its worldwide push for abortion, LGBT rights, children’s
rights, transgenderism, transhumanism, BLM riots, the toppling of President
Trump and the destruction of America. According to Francis, “our duty is to
obey” these agents. Instead of using his position to rescue humanity from the
rising tide of globalism the pope is encouraging the world to heed the very tyrants
that are generating it. He says, ‘heed the globalists and don’t resist.’
Unfortunately,
we cannot heed globalists and Christ at the same time; it’s one or the other. Let
us pray that Pope Francis can renounce his collusion with globalists and resist
temptations for a new world order, and that he will “ask [God] for the old
paths, which is the good way, and walk in it.” (Jeremias 6:16)
(Rome) Eugenio Scalfari did it again. After he declared on November 20, why Pope Francis should be defended and Francis picked up the phone to thank the left doyen of Italian journalism, Scalfari now seemed to be reading the diarchy between Benedict and Francis in an entirely new way.
The headline is provocative, but not wrong. Since the Holy See has not seriously denied Scalfari's claims for the past seven years, his representations must be taken for willy-nilly.
On November 22nd, Scalfari himself was pleased to report that Francis had thanked him by telephone on November 21st. However, he did not report anything about the content of the phone call. On December 5th, the founder of La Repubblica made up for it from a Masonic house:
“During these hours, an intellectual understanding of great interest is confirmed in the Catholic Church - and not only. It is about the agreement between the two Popes: Pope Francis and Pope Ratzinger, who has resigned from his former functions, but is still theoretically the holder of the same, which will last as long as his life will allow him. Bergoglio and Ratzinger have been in a relationship for a long time, in a community of intentions, which involved even the most complicated phases of the pontificate, which was characterized by poisons and contradictions because of Francis' reform course. It may seem difficult for a convention of such importance to still be in full application. But the exchange continues with respect for roles. All of the most important decisions that the Popes can make can and must be agreed upon and applied jointly by both. There has never been such a situation, except in the times of Boniface, Innocent and Gregory: times that go back centuries."
The representation sounds too absurd to be true. Rather, the question seems to be what Scalfari, the unofficial mouthpiece of Pope Francis, is trying to make the world know or believe. Scalfari, it is certain that after seven years of cooperation with Francis, reproduces the statements he ascribes to the Pope in an idiosyncratic manner, but unless the Holy See announces otherwise, he cannot be accused of havin made up these statements. The unusual reading of the equally unusual situation of two popes, which is now required, also reflects the opinion of Francis in Scalfari's words.
Eugenio Scalfari, the atheist friend and unofficial press officer of Pope Francis
But why does Francis, after seven years, eight months and 22 days of his pontificate, present a completely new representation with which he claims a double pontificate?
Is Benedict XVI. in quarantine?
For the time being there seems to be a plausible explanation for this: Francis knows that a growing number of Catholics are critical or even hostile to his pontificate. There is no small part of the Church that in fact no longer really recognize him as Pope. This part sees rather in Benedict XVI. the still rightful Pope. In most cases this is a personal decision that is made individually, but there are also approaches by organized groups.
Santa Marta did not hide the fact that the small trickle of 2013 has turned into a considerable stream by 2020, although for obvious reasons it is hardly recognizable to the outside world. The thesis of a Bergoglio-Ratzinger pontificate put forward by Francis through Scalfari seems to have the purpose of removing the formally central reference point, namely Benedict XVI., from his heterogeneous counter-movement. In the best case, another attempt to capture could be accepted; in the worst case, an attempt to discredit Benedict XVI. So far, Francis had stayed away from that. The attacks against Benedict XVI.and against his circle, however, came repeatedly from the closer and wider court of the Pope. Immediately after the conclave, a sheet couldn't be fit between the sayings that were passed between Francis and Benedict XVI.
That not only a sheet but entire books fit between the two popes, showed the drumbeat at the beginning, as Benedict XVI. together with Cardinal Robert Sarah, Prefect of the Congregation for Divine Worship. With the expression "From the depth of the heart " for the sacramental priesthood and Priestly Celibacy and after the Amazon Synod, generally opposed the adopting of the softening of celibacy.
Do the kingmakers want to overthrow Francis?
Is Pope Francis running out of reliable friends? The progressive forces that lifted him up and celebrated him began at some point to turn away in irritation because he could not or did not want to satisfy their hunger for radical changes, which he himself repeatedly encouraged. Since this development is fluid, it is difficult to give an exact date. However, stages can be identified based on the events and the Church in Germany that play a central role in this.
Pope Francis visited Benedict XVI for the first time after a long break.
This, specifically the progressive majority of the German Bishops' Conference began in 2018 not to wait any longer for Francis, but to take the initiative. Admitting Protestant spouses to Communion was their first step. When the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith wanted to intervene, it was called back by Pope Francis. The German rebels prevailed.
But it seems like with power: those who have some always want more of it. So the progressive appetite for breaking up the existing and implementing innovations also grows. In this sense, the "synodal journey" was followed by the German Bishops' Conference and the progressive stronghold called Central Committee of German Catholics. And suddenly there was another ghost, the ghost of a new German schism. Francis had personally participated in the 500th anniversary celebrations of Luther's “Reformation”.
Francis made an initial allusion to the schism in 2017, but in 2020 this fear took on a new quality. It was only slightly dampened because of the Corona paralysis in public life. There are voices that speak of the fact that important progressive forces who helped Francis to the papal throne have lost patience with him and even wanted to get rid of him.
Is Francis looking for new allies?
The representation spread about Eugenio Scalfari that Francis and Benedict XVI. are one heart and one soul and want the same thing in all important questions, and not just since today, but always, sounds nice, downright idyllic, but a bit too kitschy. Reality is different, which is why the strange attempt as presented by Scalfari could hardly be successful, not on the one hand and not on the other. Santa Marta knows that too. So why the advance, when even the “no sheet of paper” thesis has hardly been advocated for some time?
The papal shadow speakers
In the past few years, an unflattering term repeatedly appeared in the analyzes to describe the current pontificate. We are talking about the "Jesuit ruse." What Scalfari presents in the name of Francis is too transparent and clumsy.
If one follows the path that Francis himself has trodden on, something far more sober, perhaps even terrifying, seems to be hiding behind the most recent Scalfari teaching post. Francis wants to inform through his Masonic friend that Benedict XVI. was placed under supervision and from now on he will no longer be able to represent his own position? So there will be a coercive harmony between the two popes because the more powerful, Francis, subjects the weaker to his control?
In August 2019 was another "shadow spokesman" of Pope Francis, the British journalist Austen Ivereigh, with the statement:
“We need the to get the circle of Benedict XVI. get under control."
Ivereigh was the spokesman for Cardinal Cormac Murphy-O'Connor, a leading member of the secret circle of Sankt Gallen and its executive organ, team Bergoglio. From the British cardinal, who died in 2017, the journalist switched directly to Francis' unofficial "press department". On December 1, four days before Scalfari's versions, the new Ivereigh-book appeared on the market, which is officially a book by Pope Francis. It received the cooperation with Scalfaris' La Repubblica for publication.
Austen Ivereigh explains the encyclical Fratelli tutti for Jesuits Global
With the "control" of Benedict it did not work as well as the book by Cardinal Sarah showed. Archbishop of the Curia Georg Gänswein therefore lost his office as Prefect of the papal house, because he was supposed to ensure that Benedict distanced himself from the book project, which he did not. But a few days ago, Mario Grech, who had just been created cardinal, let the public know that Benedict XVI. was having difficulty in speaking. Gänswein denied this. If one takes some statements together, those of Ivereigh, of Cardinal Grech and of Eugenio Scalfari (on behalf of Pope Francis) and looks at the development of the past 18 months, one can understand why some draw the conclusion that Benedict XVI. has allowed himself little leeway and that which was left to him is to withdraw. Is it the aim that the voice of Benedict XVI. should no longer be heard as an independent voice?
It seems absurd to assume that Francis seriously intends to claim a double pontificate. However, it is he himself who, with this latest Scalfari move, has strengthened those who have already said that Benedict XVI. continues to be Pope. If Francis himself says this, even if only a Masonic voice in alliance with himself, why should Francis critics not, conversely, assert a papal authority of Benedict independent of Francis, when Benedict “theoretically still holds the papal functions that have continued for so long as his life will allow him, ”as long as he lives."
Did Francis consider this when he communicated his ideas to Scalfari?
Text: Giuseppe Nardi Image: La Repubblica / Wikicommons / Vatican.va (screenshots)
Edit: bvs asked how I was doing. I hate confessional blogs where people talk about themselves. Maybe there's a good reason for writing such a blog, I don't know. It's just not me. I'd rather spotlight people I love and respect, like E. Michael Jones or Roberto de Mattei (Who no doubt disagrees with me on Covid) In any event, my suffering through this disease should give me a little authority to speak about Covid and how the liberties of the West are being destroyed by efforts to respond to its mostly non-existent effects.
How am I? Horrible! I'm very slowly and painfully pushing my lungs to expand so I can keep them from getting more pneumonia and spit out the old stuff. Still on 0xygen. My family doctor is concerned it's taking so long. But so what, folks? I'm in middle age and while there are people who depend on me, if I die, would it be such a great loss?
In any case, obviously this has not changed my view on Covid. Just because it's affected me personally in such a severe, potentially lethal and horrible way, it's no reason to suppose it's a great threat to most people. The real threat are the Communists exploiting it to control people's lives and destroy independent businesses and freedom of speech!
Deaths from people who have preexisting donditions or are very elderly, do not justify putting millions of people out of work and destroying the livlihood of businesses while it enriches the usual suspects like Bezos, Soros, etc...
This disease has been awesome for me spiritually. If I had died, I might have spent thousands of years in Purgatorio, but I'd have gotten to Heaven eventually, barring any last minute lapses that were part of my own wickedness anyway. Maybe I'd have become more powerful than leftist progressives could ever imagine? I don't deserve salvation, but God's will, please don't let me die forever as I deserve, O' Lord.
Thank you God, for this trial and the opportunity to suffer and pray manfully through this pain!
Note: I'm also very grateful to God's creatures (like my cats) who gave me phone calls, consolations, prayers, had Masses said for me and offered up their own sufferings for my benefit. It's truly humbling.
Category:Description:
Michael J. Matt makes an impassioned plea for all Americans to come to the aid of our country. What's happening to the United States right now transcends political parties, religious affiliation, gender and race. If you love America, you must understand what going to happen to her in 2021.
Senator John Kerry (another apostate Catholic) told the World Economic Forum that Joe Biden, if sworn in, will make the Great Reset a top priority. But does Sen. Kerry even understand what that means? Do you?
In a gesture of support for Joe Biden, Pope Francis yesterday
quoted words that are central to Biden’s plan to remake America in the wake of
the COVID-19 “pandemic”, when he tweeted:
"To
help our society to ‘build back better’, inclusion of the vulnerable must also
entail efforts to promote their active participation.”
Biden last week launched his BuildBackBetter.gov website listing his radical priorities including forced
mask-wearing, climate change, and the creation of a “national police oversight commission” (scrutinizing police), which Francis in his tweet is backing.
The pope in his message said, “I find the expression ‘building back
better’ quite striking.” It is for reason he adulates this theme,
since it implies not a return to tradition but a return to rebellion against
any revival of tradition, i.e. to go back “better.” It indeed shows craft.
The “vulnerable” referenced by Francis in his tweet include homosexuals,
angered minorities, and Black Lives Matter members whom he has gone out
of his way to endorse, just as Biden has.
Two of a Kind
Clearly, Francis and Biden are two of a kind. Both violated electoral rules, both publicly endorse LGBT, both obey U.N. abortionists, and both promote a "Sustainable post-COVID-19 World" (Great Reset), so what does that tell us?
Biden is not "president elect" but a fake, so does Francis relate to this? Does he think that tearing down Christian morals, empowering U.N. globalists, locking down on Christian liberty and opening our borders to red insurgents are forms of 'building back better?' Apparently he does.
Biden and Francis are 'brothers' in a similar (though different)
way Benedict XVI and Trump are brothers. The former two are steeped in Marxist
deep-state agenda while the latter are smeared, detracted, and oppressed by
those of malice intent who have done everything in their power to oust them.
What the Gospel says concerning the ill treatment of Christ applies to Benedict
and Trump: "For he [Pilate] knew that the chief priests had delivered him
up out of envy." (Mark 15:10)
Why is Francis reposing hope in Biden? Does he think a
deep-state socialist is capable of good? Does he not realize that publicly
endorsing Biden makes one an accomplice to murder and crime in a similar way
that endorsing Hitler made the Nazis murderous collaborators?
What is interesting is that when we abbreviate Biden's theme of
'build back better' using the small case letters bbb, it looks like 666.
Is God providentially reminding us that Biden is an agent of Antichrist?
