Sunday, February 4, 2024

The Political Engagement of Jorge Mario Bergoglio ad maiorum Soros gloriam


By José Arturo Quarracino*

Criticizing the current pontiff as a Peronist and overlooking his undignified commitment to and connections to the predatory and genocidal plutocracy is not only a grave mistake. It also leads to the spiritual, religious and political impotence of trying to make the Catholic Church missionary and evangelizing by tolerating the fact that the “homoaffective” prelates (Tucho Fernández dixit) are a bunch of Satanists and not shepherds of the flock Jesus Christ entrusted to them.

In his recent, excellent article “El proceso sinodal, la temible 'caja de Pandora' ” (“ The Synodal Process and the Dreaded Pandora's Box” ) 1 , Argentine Archbishop Emeritus Héctor Rubén Aguer  argues it is like an inverted pyramid: all Church institutions should remain connected to the people and always start from the bottom.”  As an Argentinian, I see in these papal inclinations the ideological matrix of Peronism (to clarify: I refer to the thinking of Juan Domingo Perón, three-time president of Argentina).

I repeat the excellent remarks of Msgr. Aguer in the above-mentioned text, which no believer interested in the current affairs of the Catholic Church should miss. Except for one caveat, which leads me, for the first time, to disagree with the prelate's claim about the Peronist "ideological matrix" underlying the Bergoglian conception of the "people."

This belief in the image of a “Peronist Bergoglio” is not limited to the archbishop. Whenever the various forms of political behavior of Jorge Mario Bergoglio are analyzed, various authors resort to this image, but it is completely distorted and unreal, since strictly speaking the current Bishop of Rome was never a Peronist and did not rely on one concept and ideology to formulate his ecclesiological doctrine.

This distorted image was fueled by the fact that in the early 1970s, when Jorge Mario Bergoglio had just been elected provincial superior of the Society of Jesus in Argentina, he managed to establish a political connection with a Peronist organization of the time - the Iron Guard. It was a connection that enabled the then Jesuit Provincial to place the administration and management of the famous Universidad del Salvador, originally founded by the Jesuit Order in 1958, in the hands of that organization in 1975. It was a tactical alliance of convenience that dissolved within a few years, severing Bergoglio's connection with the group's leadership. 2

To understand Bergoglio's attitude and behavior in the position he has held since 2013, we must look at, on the one hand, his Jesuitism and, on the other hand, his subordination to the globalism promoted by the Rothschild dynasty and the political strategies of George Soros, a political actor in the aforementioned banking family.

As to the first point, it is typical of his Jesuitism to act formally as the superiors general of the Society of Jesus did, including St. Ignatius of Loyola himself, often exercising absolute and brutal command in the manner of a military commander , e.g. by dismissing bishops without cause and without observing canonical administrative procedures. Another example of Jesuitism is also the methodology and dynamics applied in the Synodality Synod that Jesuits exercise in the famous Ignatian Exercises. And the recourse to the mental reservations that have characterized the nefarious and hypocritical actions of various Jesuits throughout history - the case of Mirko Ivan Rupnik being the most recent of these - is highlighted in a recent well explained article by Augustinus Hipponensis, “ Joseph Ratzinger, Jesuitism and Saint Peter: Questions of Coherence ” 3

Bergoglio's recent intervention in defense of the sacrilegious and blasphemous declaration Fiducia supplicans, in which he justifies the "non-liturgical and non-ritual" blessing of same-sex couples by stating: "(...) when a couple spontaneously asks for the blessing, It is not the connection that is blessed, but simply the people who asked for it together. "Not the covenant, but the persons" 4, in a very clear example of this hypocritical exercise of the mental reservations so dear to Jesuitism: what is implied and "thought" by this argument is that the couple comes to ask for a blessing, but at the very moment of the blessing their union falls apart and after the blessing they are reunited.

As for the second point, Bergoglio's Peronist populism, this characterization is unfortunately not accurate, because it overlooks a fact: Bergoglio's "devotion" to the people does not come from his late approach to Peronism, but from the strategy of the Jesuit order, which was outlined by the then Superior General Pedro Arrupe (1965–1983) and in the XXXI. and XXXII. General Congregation of the Society of Jesus (1965-1966 and 1974-1975) in order to inculturate the Jesuit order in the life of the people and to identify with it.

That is, Bergoglio adopts the term “people” not because of his proximity to Peronism – the largest Argentine popular movement of the 20th century – but because of his membership in the Society of Jesus .

Why is it important to clarify this confusion? Because what Bergoglio promoted during his pontificate is not “Peronist populism”, but the divisive, multifaceted and progressive politics that George Soros has promoted in the hearts of nations over the past decades, in order to create “new” concepts and ideas among peoples, to spread practices that are in direct contradiction to the great humanistic and Christian tradition that has shaped the souls and feelings of the peoples of the earth throughout history. Something very similar to what Bergoglio is doing in the Office of St. Peter: abolition of the liturgical and doctrinal tradition, veneration of Pachamama, criticism of “indietrism,” new “doctrinal pastoral developments,” neutralization of the two-thousand-year-old ecclesiastical magisterium, priority of “pastoral charity” over that doctrinal truth, etc.

Already in December 2020, Father Jorge Mario, together with Cardinal Peter Turkson, formalized the Vatican's alliance with the Council for Inclusive Capitalism , promoted, institutionalized and led by Baroness Lynn Forester de Rothschild. 5

And last year, the Bishop of Rome placed control of the teaching, research, promotion and dissemination of the Church's social teachings in the hands of the Soros family 's Open Society Foundations and rejected the evangelization of America as part of Catholic teaching. 6  For this purpose, Pan-American Committee of Judges for Social Rights and Franciscan Doctrine was incorporated into the Vatican structure as a private association of believers with an international character and the Fray Bartolomé de las Casas Institute was founded to research and promote the social rights for academic, teaching and training purposes on the topics of social rights, migration and colonialism, whose board members are affiliated with the Open Society Foundations .7 The Bishop of Rome has thus placed control of the social teaching of the Catholic Church in the hands of one of the political arms of the Rothschild family, distancing true Catholics from this social apostolate.

In other words, Father Jorge Mario Bergoglio acts in his pontificate not as a pontiff, but as a political agent of George Soros, the front man of one of the families that own the world. This is the essence of Bergoglio's papal practice: transforming the Church of Christ into a hybrid, ad maiorem Soros' gloriam.

In this sense, the Bishop of Rome neither commits a mistake nor exercises a heterodox papacy: rather, he implements a political plan to colonize and neutralize the missionary and evangelizing work of the Church.

Criticizing him as a “Peronist,” which he never was and is not, and ignoring his progressive anti-Catholic work is a grave mistake that leads to spiritual, religious and political impotence, which is exactly what the great enemy of God wants and intends for humanity.

When King Antiochus Epiphanes in the 2nd century B.C. when the “abomination of desolation” was carried out in the Temple of Jerusalem in the 1st century BC, Judas Maccabee and his brothers led the rebellion against the blasphemous crime.8 Where is the Catholic rebellion today in the face of the “abomination of desolation” being committed in the bosom of the Church of Christ?

*José Arturo Quarracino, Professor Emeritus of Philosophy at the Universidad del Salvador in Buenos Aires.

Image: Wikicommons/Flickr/ by Michael Wuertenberg

1 Héctor Rubén Aguer: El processo sinodal, la temible 'caja de Pandora'.

2 Details about this connection and the myth of the “Peronist Bergoglio” can be found in the interview “ Bergoglio is not a Peronist . ”

3 Augustinus Hipponensis: Joseph Ratzinger, il gesuitismo e S. Pietro: questioni di coerenza , January 23, 2024 .

Address of the Holy Father Francis to the participants in the general assembly of the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith, January 26, 2024; see also: Francis officially commented on Fiducia supplicans for the first time, January 29, 2024.

5 José Arturo Quarracino: The 30 Monedas de Plata al Concejo para el Capitalismo Inclusivo, March 16, 2021 ; see also: Mel Gibson: The Vatican is a wolf in sheep's clothing. Francis, the agenda of the globalists and 'monsters with miters' , September 15, 2021.

Joint Statement of the Dicasteries for Culture and Education and for Promoting Integral Human Development on the “Doctrine of Discovery” , March 30, 2023.

Quirógrafo del Santo Padre por el cual erige el “Comité Panamericano de Juezas y Jueces por los Derechos Sociales y la Doctrina Franciscana (COPAJU) como Asociación privada de Falles with character internacional, y creat bajo su dependencia el “Instituto de Investigaciones jurídicas Fray Bartolomé de las Casas , August 15, 2023; see also: “Inexplicable appointments” by Pope Francis, September 4, 2023 .

8 1 Mac 1:57; Deuteronomy 9:27; cf. Mt 24:15.


  1. Hey Tucker:

    Great job cut & pasting. Most of your kind can’t figure that out.

  2. This piece of contrived informed commentary wrapped up in a package of turgid verbiage is typical of the approach of the Barons of the right wing 'catholic' press and keenly lapped up by Tucker. Free association, baseless inferred guilt, gossip, ideology posing as serious critique and sheer lies are all put through the blender and served up as Gospel true.

    No wonder the dribblers and bedwetters love it.

  3. Talk about turgid verbiage with a vast gulf of meaninglessness. Is this what AIDS does to your brain, Gaybrielle?

    “This piece of contrived informed commentary wrapped up in a package of turgid verbiage is typical of the approach of the Barons of the right wing 'catholic' press and keenly lapped up by Tucker. Free association, baseless inferred guilt, gossip, ideology posing as serious critique and sheer lies are all put through the blender and served up as Gospel true.

    No wonder the dribblers and bedwetters love it.”

  4. Vatican II "catholicism", like evangelical christianity, is a creation of the American state as is the term judeo-christianity. Your federal tax dollars at work.

  5. "turgid verbiage"

    Stop! I'm getting excited.

  6. ""turgid verbiage"

    Stop! I'm getting excited."

    Ata boy. Keep studying that dictionary. It's full of words you may not have heard before. Soon you will be making full sentences.

  7. No need.
    I am fascinated by your turgidity.

  8. Would that Nemo 3:13 PM demonstrated utter disgust at the ongoing nagging hostility against Francis as demonstrated in the thread of lies and malevolence in this post.

  9. Flatfooted Gaybrielle brings back memories of the rotting Andy Rooney confronted with Ali G.