Saturday, October 30, 2021

Medical Bombshell: Pfizer Vax Attacks Human Blood Creating Clots Under Microscope



  1. Alternative news sources and (cancelled) medical experts have been sounding the alarm on this all year.

  2. If the putative vaccines had been derived from the brains of politicians whose heads had been bashed in by sand wedges would those shots have been approved for experimental use to say nothing about being mandated for millions of Americans?

    Would the Bishop of Rome support those putative vaccines and even mandate their use before he allowed you to worship God inside Saint Peter's Basiclia?

  3. Fake news. Get vaccinated.

  4. T....any idea what's happened to Dad29? He hasn't posted for answer to queries. Blogging world's pretty small; you have any idea if he's OK?

    1. Susan, I’m sorry. I’ve been swamped. I thought he posted a few days ago.

  5. Gaybrielle's Pro-Life Death-vaxx SalesmanOctober 30, 2021 at 6:08 PM

    Remember friends, taking injections developed from murder victims is pro-life. Totally logical.

  6. Vaccines for Shingles, Small pox, Polio, several Influenza strains and others to say nothing of consumables such as coffee creamers, taste enhancers, face creams and many more were developed using fetal stem cell technology. Too late chaps.
    Furthermore, the Catholic Church teaches that there should be no moral scruples in using them and especially today, COVID 19 vaccines that derive from the same stem cell technology.

  7. John Cunningham, I have a question. The point you seem to be making is that our secular society cleverly slipped a number of earlier vaccines (and commercial products) past us without our knowing that the stem cells of aborted babies were used in their manufacturing and/or testing processes.

    While I neither agree nor disagree with the accuracy of those facts you’ve alleged (I’ve never researched the issue), for the sake of discussion let me assume that you are correct. What then is your point?

    Is it that since we were fooled into believing we were not supporting abortion by uses abortion-related vaccines and products in the past that it’s now too late for us to reject a vaccine that we know for sure uses aborted babies in the manufacturing/testing process? If not, what is your point?

  8. John Cunningham, one other point that I should have mentioned in my earlier comment. You have confused the “Catholic Church” with the “Conciliar Church” of the modern popes and bishops. The Catholic Church has never suggested that there should be “no moral scruples” in using the abortion-related vaccines. It is only the followers of the Conciliar Church who profess what you are advocating.

    Indeed, many of the the same members of the hierarchy who have given the green light to the jab have also smiled approvingly at homosexual behavior, same sex unions, etc. etc. etc. They speak for themselves or the “Conciliar Church”, not the Catholic Church. Faithful Catholic leaders such as Archbishop Vigano and Bishop Schneider teach that the abortion-related vaccine should be rejected.

  9. For a clear, unambiguous statement of the Catholic Church's Magisterium on the morality of receiving COVIE-19 vaccines that some claim are 'ethically tainted' see:

    Neither Vigano nor Schneider are the Magisterium of the Catholic Church. You should know the difference.

  10. For the unambiguous approval of pharmakeia created by Frankenstein labs, see Frankenchurch.

  11. THIS is one of the most credible demonstrations I've seen of these jabs under them microscope.
    What these doctors saw is similar to what some German pathologists saw. Thank you for posting this!



    The first papers about this were in January. October BOMBSHELL!!! indeed