Saturday, April 21, 2018

Pope Francis Does the Holy Liturgy

Pope Francis is to ordain 16 deacons to the priesthood on April 22
The Words of Consecration and the Pope

(Rome) The Holy See yesterday published the texts and chants for the Pope's Mass on the 4th Sunday after Easter, which Pope Francis will celebrate on April 22 in St. Peter's Basilica. On this occasion, the head of the Church will consecrate several candidates to the priesthood.


The priestly ordinations

Pope Francis will ordain sixteen deacons preparing for the priesthood as priests, sincethe 55th World Day of Prayer is celebrated  at the same time for priestly vocations.
Five of them come from the diocesan seminary of the Diocese of Rome. The number reflects the situation of priestly vocations in the Pope's own diocese.
The other eleven candidates come from other countries and continents. Six come from the Roman missionary college Redemptoris Mater of the Neocatechumenal Way; four from the Famiglia dei Discepoli (Family of the Disciples) and one from the Opera Don Orione. They come from Croatia, Madagascar, Vietnam, Myanmar, Colombia, San Salvador, Romania, India and Peru. Eleven of them, the five candidates of the diocese and the candidates of the seminary Redemptoris Mater,  are consecrated and incardinated for the diocese of Rome.


The words of consecration

According to the announcement, the III. Canon has been chosen. His predecessor Benedict XVI. preferred the Roman canon. [What else is there?] In contrast, Francis varies and also benefits from the new prayers, which were created ex novo only by the liturgical reform of the 60s. Since then, the Anaphora can be said in the vernacular, as will be the case on April 22nd. Benedict XVI. preferred Latin, the language of the Church, and not only at celebrations in the Patriarchal basilicas and in Rome, but also abroad. Conversely, Francis, who also uses the vernacular in St. Peter's Basilica in a solemn Papal Mass and not the Roman Canon.

On April 22, Pope Francis will use the words "for all" to reflect the Latin "pro multis". This contradicts the order of Benedict XVI, who had already prescribed in 2006 binding for the whole world Church as the more appropriate, because closer to the original translation "for many".
The majority of Italian bishops had in prounced for the retention of "for all" in 2010. Benedict XVI. patiently conducted persuasion seemed to bear fruit in early 2013. One of the most persistent opponents, Archbishop Bruno Forte, had assailed Benedict's camp with waving flags defending the "pro multis / for many."


The rebels

Shortly thereafter, Benedict XVI. made his  surprising resignation known. Since then, there has been a standstill in the rebellious states. Although at that time the Vatican Recognition of the new version of the Italian translation of the Missale was almost complete, it has not been published until today.

Pro multis
Pro multis
The opponents of Benedict XVI.s mandated translation immediately raised their voices after the election of Pope Francis,  especially in the linguistic areas, including the German one, which had already delayed, denied, and boycotted the order under the German Pope, and therefore the new translations had not yet been printed.
Cardinal Karl Lehrmann (Mainz) and Archbishop Alois Kothgasser (Salzburg) complained of Vatican "interference". In April 2013, one month after the election of Pope Francis, the Austrian bishops published a "clarification" that the only admissible translation was "for all" because the only approved German translation of the Missal was that of 1975. The admonition was addressed to the liturgically most sensitive part of the clergy, who began to complain that seven years after Benedict's change, nothing had yet happened.
Pope Francis sent out contradictory signals. From them one could read a supposed support of every position and also the opposite. Most appropriately, his attitude is likely to be reflected in a both-and-also, as he showed it in 2015 within a few days at the Mass celebrations in Cuba and in the US. In both countries he celebrated in Spanish. In Cuba, because it is the national language, in the US once for the large number of Spanish-speaking immigrants. In Cuba he used the words of change "for all" (por todos), in the US the words of change "for many" (por muchos).

The same pope, the same Spanish language, and yet such a difference?

The reason is that the English translation of the Missal was already published at that time, and for pro multis that of Benedict XVI. wanted "for many", while the new Spanish translation was not available at that time and in the old formula the pro-multis was still presented as " for all".


Everyone after his Façon ...?

In other words, every country and its episcopal conference should decide for themselves. A similar instruction was issued by Francis in September 2017. Shortly before he declared the Liturgy reform of 1969 as "irreversible."
His words can be seen at the memorial mass for the deceased cardinals on 3 November 2017 as a confirmation of the position of Benedict XVI. In his sermon , Francis said:
"The 'many who awaken to eternal life are to be understood as the 'many' for whom the blood of Christ was shed. It is the great number of those who, thanks to God's merciful goodness, may experience the reality of eternal life, the perfect victory over death achieved through the resurrection."
But even the Pope does not abide by the law, because in his celebration of April 22, Francis is opposed to the order of Benedict XVI. will say not "many", but "all." An anachronism. The Pope, by virtue of his authority, declares that the words of change are to be pronounced "for many" - that was 2006 -, and 2018, twelve years later, even the Pope does not abide by it, because the responsible Episcopal Conference has not yet re-translated and published the Missal? Absurd.
Francis, however, behaves this way and signals that the question is rather unimportant to him. There would be another way. Those whom Benedict XVI, by deferring to Church Latin, which is unique and includes both "for many" and "for all". But for that, Francis, according to Roman insiders, obviously lacks the necessary liturgical sensitivity. In addition, severe prejudices prevent him from consistently considering such a step.



Regardless of this, the Office of the Liturgical Celebrations of the Pope is adamant that the pamphlets for the consecration should state that the pope "shows the consecrated host to the people and kneels adoringly" and "shows and adores the chalice to the people performing a genuflection."
It is well known that the adoring genuflections have not occurred since the election of Pope Francis. As is well known, it should be known that this is due to knee problems. The fact is that neither Pope Francis nor the Vatican Press Office has made a statement in more than five years of this pontificate. And that despite the importance of the question. The assumptions, allegations or even well-intentioned explanations of individual Vaticanists can not replace an official opinion. However, such is not forthcoming, which is why the Pope standing before the Blessed Sacrament will remain an ambivalent picture of this pontificate.
Text: Giuseppe Nardi
Trans: Tancred


Anonymous said...

He loves the neocats. They are heretics like him.
I strongly doubt the validity of these ordinations.

Anonymous said...

The sorry ass can get on his knees to wash Muslim feet.

Who cares if he's ordaining priests to fill new order pews? They ain't Catholic...yawn.

Anonymous said...

What KNEE PROBLEM... Somehow, miraculously he never has "knee problem" when he has to kneel on each and every of the HOLY THURSDAYS in front of women, unfaithful, lesbians, non-Catholics, Muslims and atheists or criminals... However, he ALWAYS has a "knee problem" when you have to kneel in front of HOLY EUCHARIST... I think, the devil has exactly the same problem...

JBQ said...

Catholic churches have always been a holy respite from the storm of evil. The reason would be the real presence of Christ in the Eucharist kept in the tabernacle. If we have a pontiff who does not believe in the Real Presence, then we have an absolute nightmare where Communion is only bread and a symbol of Christ's unity with His Church which now includes all mankind as the "children of God".---When my Irish mother passed on, I went to the Munich born German rector of the traditional church and asked him to let me pray in front of the tabernacle. He graciously unlocked the church which resides in a poor and unruly neighborhood. I was able to listen to the Lord's words of comfort.--As a side issue, I had donated 12k which my mother had left me in stock to the church. This stock came from the blood of her father who worked for Western Electric which evolved into Southwestern Bell.---I was horrified to find out that this church spends that amount every weekend for heating and cooling from Saturday evening through the Sunday High Mass. This was disheartening to say the least. The sacrifice of my grandfather and mother were "p----d" down the toilet in one half weekend. There was no help for the poor. ----I then found out that this church is the one that the mafia in the City used to educate their children and that there is still a mafia presence in bars owned around the church. The corporation which handles among other issues the heating and cooling is evidently controlled by the mafia. I did not want to learn any more and have given this parish up as a center of my Christianity.----It must also be reminded that I attended a High Mass in 2008, where the preacher called then Senator Obama to task for his unlimited support for abortion. He called him a "modern day King Herod for his killing of the innocent". All 'ell broke out and the bishop administrator who replaced the exiled Archbishop Burke went storming into the Oratory for a one week visitation. This was a so called violation of separation of Church and State. --- At the end of the week, the rector was sent packing (Schmitz) back to Germany and replaced with another from Munich. The offending preacher was exiled to Kansas City.---I would relate this incident with a quotation from Clint Eastwood's "The Outlaw Josie Wales" aimed at Senator Obama. "Don't p--s down my back, Senator, and tell me it's raining".

Chad R said...


Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.