Edit: this aberrosexual enabler is beside himself with glee.
[National Catholic Reporter] think that the truth is that Communion was not mentioned because that was the only way the paragraphs could get a two-thirds majority. Like the Second Vatican Council, the synod achieved consensus through ambiguity. This means that they are leaving Pope Francis free to do whatever he thinks best.
Hats off to the drafting committee that found exactly the right language to achieve consensus even if it does not give a definitive answer to our questions.
Josh McElwee also reports that the document touches on artificial contraception, quoting Pope Paul VI’s 1968 encyclical Humanae Vitae that prohibited the practice. But the Synod document also calls for a "consensual dialog" between spouses when considering children.
http://ncronline.org/blogs/faith-and-justice/synod-remarried-catholics-consensus-ambiguity
Let you yeah be yeah ,and your nay be nay ,all else comes from the devil ,so much for ambiguity .
ReplyDeleteDamian Thompson is ambiguous if you know what I mean.
DeleteMaybe so, but at least he is man enough to know it is a sin that cries out to Heaven, is perverted, and doesn't claim it normative.
Delete178 v 80 is clear not ambiguous.
DeleteAgreed. Here is Pat Buchanan with clarity:
ReplyDeletehttp://www.wnd.com/2015/10/is-the-pope-toying-with-heresy/
The first agenda item for the next pope (hopefully Pius XIII) should be the dissolution and destruction of the Jesuit order.
ReplyDeleteHeresy is a devil's toy, deadly....up to 2017 with this BoR, and then, He will come, estote parati.
ReplyDelete