Wednesday, May 26, 2021

 Pope Francis gave the opening address at the spring assembly of the Italian Bishops' Conference.

(Rome) Excluding the public opening of the 74th General A3ssembly of took place on Monday Italian bishop-kon-fe-ence instead. Pope Francis had not only addressed personnel issues in his opening speech improvised, so participants, but also a "reinterpretation" of the Motu proprio Summorum Pon-ti-fi-cum announced.

display

The first message concerns the statements of Pope Francis to the New-be-set-ton-gen of the prefect item of Got-tes-service-kon-gre-ga-ti-on . The second message refers to the improvised opening speech of Francis and concerns the liquidation of the Motu proprio Summorum Pon-ti-fi-cum . Corresponding Gerüch th have long been in circulation. Above all, Italian bishops is the most significant legacy of the pontificate of Pope Benedict XVI. a thorn in the sideUnderstanding of the tradition was never pronounced among the bishops of the Apennine peninsula. The movement of tradition in the “land of the Pope” is not a phenomenon of popular piety, but of intellectuals.

What was said behind closed doors on Monday, reported the traditional French portal Paix Liturgique as follows :

"After the journalists had left the assembly hall, the Pope raised a subject that unites many bishops on the peninsula: the execution of Summorum Pontificum."

And further:

“Francis confirmed the imminent publication of a document that he would write to revise the motu proprio of Benedict XVI. 'to be reinterpreted'. "

The publication of this document was delayed because of objections, said Francis. Especially Cardinal Luis Ladaria SJ, prefect of Glau-ben-kon-gre-ga-ti-on , have raised concerns. Cardinal Ladaria has been responsible for the so-called Ecclesia Dei communities since June 20197 . First as chairman of the Pontifical Commission Ecclesia Dei and since January 19, 2019 as Prefect of the Faith, after Pope Francis dissolved this commission and incorporated it as a department of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith .

Cardinal Ladaria and other church representatives argue, according to Pope Francis, that a restriction of Summorum Pontificum would provoke "a worldwide malaise" and an "uncontrollable opposition".

Cardinal Secretary of State Pietro Parolin, however, is promoting the document of a "reinterpretation". Francis named as the cornerstone:

  • Communities that already celebrate in the traditional form could continue to do so;
  • Diocesan priests, on the other hand, should receive special permission.

This would give general permission for Pope Benedict XVI. granted to all priests, withdrawn. The "reinterpretation" would be, despite all the lack of clarity in the details, a step backwards to the status of the Motu proprio Ecclesia Dei from 1988, as a traditional diocesan priest of a northern Italian archdiocese commented. It also remains unclear what hurdles new communities of tradition will face in the future in order to gain recognition and the intended special permit. It was seen as a bad sign in traditionalist circles that one of Pope Francis' closest confidants, the then newly appointed Archbishop of La Plata, Msgr. Victor Manuel Fernández, in 2019Summorum Pon-ti-fi-cum in his archdiocese eli-mi-te-neer . In the past three years, Andrea Grillo, the progressive Italian liturgist referred to as the “liturgist of the Pope”, has struck the same note several times.

"Reform for the worse"

According to the tradition also affiliated website Messa in Lati no Pope Francis got the Italian bishops, an "imminent reform" of Summorum Pontificum announced "for the worse".

“After his umpteenth warning against admitting 'rigid young people' (i.e. those who are faithful to the doctrine of the faith) in seminars, Francis announced to the bishops that he had reached the third draft of a text, the restrictive measures for celebration by Catholic priests the extraordinary form of the mass provided by Benedict XVI. has been released. "

Francis to the bishops:

"Benedict XVI. only wanted to meet the Lefebvrians with Summorum Pontificum, but today it is mainly the young priests who want to celebrate the Tridentine Mass, although they may not even understand Latin ”.

With "Lefebvrianer" Francis meant the Society of St. Pius X. (FSSPX), which was founded in 1970 by Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre. Msgr. Lefebvre was excommunicated in 1988 for unauthorized episcopal ordinations. He died in Switzerland in 1991. The excommunication has not been lifted by Rome to this day. A few days later, the episcopal ordinations resulted in the Motu proprio Ecclesia Dei of Pope John Paul II, with which Rome priests and believers met tradition and granted them a right to exist in the Church. However, the framework was tight. It was not until Pope Benedict XVI. expanded this framework in 2007 with the Motu proprio Summorum Pontificum generously with the intention of keeping the church oxygenated to make it more sustainable.

According to Messa in Latino, Francis told on Monday the case of a bishop, “to whom a young priest had turned and announced his intention to celebrate in the extraordinary form. When asked if he knew Latin, the young priest told him that he was learning it. The bishop replied that it would be better if he learned Spanish or Vietnamese because there were many Latin Americans and Vietnamese in the diocese. "

Also Messa in Lati no concrete that the reintroduction would be a special permission for the celebration of the traditional rite a "step backwards". It is also unclear whether the indult mentioned by Francis should be obtained by the local bishop or even by the Vatican. This "reform" of Francis would involve a renewed "ghettoization" of priests and faithful who are connected to the traditional rite, so Messa in Lati-no :

"After Moses the Liberator, Pharaoh would return."

Messa in Lati-no also contradicts emphatically that Benedict XVI. Summorum Pon-ti-fi-cum had granted "only" to the Pius-bru-the-economy "to meet". There are a number of clear statements by the German Pope that testify otherwise. As he himself emphasized, it was his main concern that “the Church should maintain internal continuity with its past”. That is why he also said that what was previously "sacred" cannot suddenly be wrong.

Messa in Lati no quotes a priest with the words:

"It does not seem surprising to me that the bishops attack Summorum Pontificum, after all, the question of the traditional liturgy is the most serious, serious and topical problem of the Church."

As Francis spoke of a "third draft" for the said document, it is established so Messa in Lati-no , "that they are working seriously (and more recently) to limit Summorum Pontificum and de facto repeal".

“Therefore there is really cause for concern and prayer: Will Benedict XVI. say something about it? "

Text: Giuseppe di Nar-
image: Avvenire (screenshot)


Bishop Strickland Angers Powers and Principalities

 May 25, 2021 (LifeSiteNews) — In this episode of The Bishop Strickland Show, His Excellency explains how people in every area of society, including politics, must stand for the truth. He encourages listeners to realize that Jesus Christ protects all who promote and stand up for His teachings.

More specifically, Strickland notes that believers should be unwavering in their pushing for laws based on natural law and “reflect Christian” principles. He also states that society is heading on a path “to our destruction” by ignoring God’s teachings,

AMDG


Saturday, May 22, 2021

Clown Planet News 5.22.21

Tuesday, May 18, 2021

Bishop Condemns “Israel” for Bombing Nuns and Christian Families


JERUSALEM (ChurchMilitant.com) - The former patriarchal vicar of Jerusalem is condemning Israel for bombing nuns and Christian families.

Bishop Emeritus Giacinto-Boulos Marcuzzo of the patriarchate of Jerusalem for Palestine and the Holy City on Friday beat back some mainstream media claims that Israel is properly handling its bombing runs on the Gaza Strip.

Marcuzzo outlined, "The Israeli raids take place after the launching of missiles by Hamas on the territory of Israel, but according to what we see, the considerations of those who, in the United States, described the military reaction of the Jewish state as 'proportionate' are completely unfounded. They bomb from afar."

AMDG

Tuesday, May 11, 2021

Still think it was worth it?

Moderna
Pfizer  


Biden's Fairy Tale from way back.

Monday, May 10, 2021

Scam!

Saturday, May 8, 2021

Vatican Hosts 'Pro-Vax Propaganda' Conference

‘Don’t underestimate’ the number of people with a ‘vested interest’ in COVID-19's longevity

Friday, May 7, 2021

A Serious Man

Is the Liberal dyke starting to crack?

It should come as no surprise that YouTube would pull this video, but even Faux News won't let you see it. 
This son of spooks (who tried to join the Company himself) even seems to be in favor of getting the Covid-19 "vaccine."   But, sometimes, you're just not allowed to ask any questions.   Or, maybe Tucker is a plant and this is all part of a really broad scam. https://www.podomatic.com/podcasts/tkelly6785757/episodes/2021-05-08T05_46_27-07_00

https://citizenfreepress.com/breaking/tucker-carlson-shatters-media-silence-why-are-thousands-of-people-dying-from-covid-vaccine/


https://www.lewrockwell.com/2021/05/gary-g-kohls/no-jab-for-me-and-here-are-35-reasons-why/ Remember when Sleepy Joe's female dog made a little sense?  


 Canadian Nurse breaks her silence. https://vladtepesblog.com/2021/05/03/canadian-nurse-speaks-out-on-her-view-of-the-pandemic-from-her-research-and-experience/ 


  MUST WATCH! If you really want to understand what these COVID “vaccines” do in YOUR body, pull up a chair and watch this video at least 2 or 3 times, as Dr. Tenpenny makes so many “clarifications” that it is hard to keep up with her. These are NOT VACCINES -- they are EXPERIMENTS -- and scientifically grossly inaccurately designed “experiments” at that -- and everyone including the media must STOP calling them “vaccines”. They bear absolutely NO resemblance to the traditional vaccines! Time to call a spade a spade (otherwise, no “informed consent”!). Even as experiments, they clearly do NOT follow the genuine Scientific Method; there are so many major assumptions, claims, inaccuracies, unknowns, and internal contradictions with NO documentations to back them up that it is clear that even the producers of these “experiments” could never really know what these “experiments” are doing inside your body!! And they must know this!! So WHY are they doing it???????? Think about that one for a while ... As a scientist I'm pleading for genuine solid academically qualified scientists to come out of the woodwork and publicly CHALLENGE all this fake "science" ASAP! This video should be sent to all acquaintances, all local officials and medical personnel, all state and federal officials, and everyone in the U.S. Congress -- and such deadly “experiments” on the American people must be STOPPED and the producers must be held to LEGAL ACCOUNTABILITY ... NOW! -- DNI] https://vimeo.com/544366368/056dedf320 

 Do yourself a favor and stay away from anyone who has received the DeathVaxx














Note too that the reports to VAERS are estimated to consist of only about 10% of the real numbers ... and precisely who is it at the FDA that is continuously involved in promoting everything “pandemic”????????  DNI]

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/vaers-vaccine-injuries-climb-pfizer-seeks-full-approval/

Children’s Health Defense

May 7, 2021

Reported Vaccine Injuries Continue to Climb, Pfizer Seeks Full Approval for COVID Vaccine

VAERS data released today showed 157,277 reports of adverse events following COVID vaccines, including 3,837 deaths and 16,014 serious injuries between Dec. 14, 2020 and April 30, 2021.

by Megan Redshaw

The number of reports of injuries and deaths following COVID vaccines continues to rise, according to data released today by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). The data comes directly from reports submitted to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS).

VAERS is the primary government-funded system for reporting adverse vaccine reactions in the U.S. Reports submitted to VAERS require further investigation before a causal relationship can be confirmed.

Every Friday, VAERS makes public all vaccine injury reports received as of a specified date, usually about a week prior to the release date. Today’s data show that between Dec. 14, 2020 and April 30, a total of 157,277 total adverse events were reported to VAERS, including 3,837 deaths — an increase of 293 over the previous week — and 16,014 serious injuries, up 2,467 since last week.




In the U.S., 240.2 million COVID vaccine doses had been administered as of April 30. This includes 105 million doses of Moderna’s vaccine, 127 million doses of Pfizer and 8 million doses of the Johnson &Johnson (J&J) COVID vaccine.

Of the 3,837 deaths reported as of April 30, 24% occurred within 48 hours of vaccination, 16% occurred within 24 hours and 39% occurred in people who became ill within 48 hours of being vaccinated.

This week’s VAERS data show:

FDA set to authorize Pfizer vaccine for young teens

On May 4, The Defender reported the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is preparing to authorize use of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID vaccine in adolescents 12 to 15 years old by early next week.

The company said it also plans to ask the FDA to expand Emergency Use Authorization for its vaccine for children ages 2 to 11 in September.

According to CDC data, the death rate among adolescents ages 0 to 17 who get COVID and are subsequently hospitalized is 0.7%, with many experiencing either mild or no symptoms at all. The COVID death rate in all adolescent age categories is less than 0.1%, leading some experts to question whether vaccines should be targeted to an age group that so far appears to be mostly spared from severe COVID.

As CNN reported Friday, Pfizer filed for full FDA approval for its COVID vaccine for people ages 16 and up. The FDA requires vaccine manufacturers submit data on manufacturing processes, facilities and additional information that demonstrates the vaccine can be produced reliably and consistently.

Once all the required information is submitted, a goal date will be set for a decision by the FDA. Pfizer requested priority review, which asks the FDA to take action within six months, compared to 10 months designated under standard review.

Third U.S. male diagnosed with vaccine-induced blood clots, woman dies from brain hemorrhage after J&J vaccine

On May 6, The Defender reported doctors at University of Utah Health treated the third male to develop vaccine-induced thrombotic thrombocytopenia in the U.S.

The man, under age 50, received J&J’s vaccine in early April. Ten days later he experienced pain in his toes, which then progressed to his thighs. He later began experiencing chest pain. A CT scan revealed a bilateral pulmonary embolism. Physicians discovered low platelets and blood clots in his legs and lungs, leading them to suspect VITT was the cause.

On May 4, The Defender reported a 35-year-old Michigan woman died from complications 11 days after receiving J&J’s vaccine. The woman’s family said her headache started on April 16 — eight days after being vaccinated. She died three days later. Her death certificate notes a natural death, specifically from an acute subarachnoid hemorrhage, or bleeding between the brain and tissue around the brain.

The attending physician filed a report to VAERS. In an email to the family, the CDC confirmed her death had been reported to VAERS, but said the system is not designed to determine whether a reported adverse event was caused by the vaccine.

Children’s Health Defense queried the VAERS data for adverse events associated with the formation of clotting disorders and other related conditions and found 2,808 reports for all three vaccines from Dec. 14, 2020, through April 30.

Of the 2,808 cases reported, there were 1043 reports attributed to Pfizer, 893 reports to Moderna and 860 reports to J&J — 847 cases more than U.S. health officials acknowledged during the April 23 meeting where it was recommended the pause be lifted on J&J’s vaccine.

Denmark ditches J&J vaccine

On May 3, The Defender reported Denmark became the first country to exclude J&J’s COVID vaccine from its vaccination program over a potential link to blood clotting disorders.

The Danish Health Authority said in a statement it had concluded “the benefits of using the COVID-19 vaccine from J&J do not outweigh the risk of causing the possible adverse effect in those who receive the vaccine.”

“Taking the present situation in Denmark into account, what we are currently losing in our effort to prevent severe illness from COVID-19 cannot outweigh the risk of causing possible side effects in the form of severe blood clots in those we vaccinate,” the health authority said.

Denmark stopped using AstraZeneca’s vaccine last month after European regulators found a possible link between the vaccine and “very rare” blood clots.

CDC ignores The Defender, no response after two months

According to the CDC website, “the CDC follows up on any report of death to request additional information and learn more about what occurred and to determine whether the death was a result of the vaccine or unrelated.”

The Defender reached out to the CDC on March 8 with a written list of questions about reported deaths and injuries related to COVID vaccines, the status of ongoing investigations reported in the media, if autopsies are being done, the standard for determining whether an injury is causally connected to a vaccine, and education initiatives to encourage and facilitate proper and accurate reporting.

We have made numerous attempts to contact the CDC via phone and email. As of May 7, 60 days after our initial inquiry, we still have yet to receive answers to our questions.

Children’s Health Defense asks anyone who has experienced an adverse reaction, to any vaccine, to file a report following these three steps.