Friday, April 7, 2017

Pope Francis and the Roman Corpus Christi Procession -- A Difficult Relationship

(Rome) The Roman Eucharistic procession, does not seem particularly appealing to Pope Francis. At no other feast besides Holy Thursday does he engage in more and more revolutionary interventions.

750 years of Corpus Christi in Rome with Some Interruptions

After the celebration of the Holy Mass in front of the Lateran Basilica, the Eucharistic procession, the Eucharistic procession takes place on the evening of the Thursday after Holy Trinity Sunday to the papal Basilica of Santa Maria Maggiore.


Corpus Christi procession with Pope Alexander VII

The Corpus Christi festival and procession through the streets of Rome was introduced in 1264 by Pope Urban IV for the public worship of the Blessed Sacrament. As the most ancient representations show, the popes did not participate on foot, but allowed themselves and the Corpus Domini to be carried. In the process, they remained worshiping all the time before the Blessed Sacrament.The Feast of Corpus Christi developed, so that on the feast itself the Blessed Sacrament was led from St. Peter's through the streets and quarters around. On Sunday a procession follows from the Lateran Basilica and in the octave of the feast once again a procession in the Vatican. All three were personally led by the Popes.
The procession of Corpus Christi became the most important procession in papal Rome and at the same time the most controversial since the Enlightenment.
In 1798 and 1799 it could not take place because Napoleon had occupied Rome at the head of the French Revolutionary troops and had proclaimed a republic. Pope Pius VI. was declared dismissed, exiled, and finally deported to France, where he died in August 1799 in the dungeon of Valence. In 1800, under his successor, Pius VII, the procession could be resumed, until Napoleon also captured him in 1809 and annexed the church state to France. After the end of Napoleonic rule, the Pope was able to return to Rome and again solemnly commemorate the procession from 1816 onwards.
In 1849, Giuseppe Mazzini and his Radical Democratic and Masonic fellows prevented the procession. The pope was at Gaeta and the new gentlemen decreed that the Corpus Christi processions could only take place "in the churches". Processions on public streets and squares were forbidden, for "fools are the ones who believe in the Blessed Sacrament," as the Protestant weekly newspaper L'Eco della Verità wrote in Florence in 1865.
When Rome was conquered by Italian troops in 1870, the procession was again forbidden. The popes had become prisoners in the Vatican. It should remain more than half a century.

The resumption of 1929 and the return of John Paul II,



Corpus Christi procession with Pius XII.

In February 1929, the Lateran treaties were signed with which an international agreement between Italy and the Holy See could be found. In the same year Pope Pius XI. led the Corpus Christi procession, which now, however, limited itself to the St Peter's Square.
In 1964, on the occasion of the 700th anniversary of the introduction of the Feast of Corpus Christi, Pope Paul VI decided to lead it from the Vatican. In the following years, it was held in another of the numerous new Roman city districts. An attempt to get to the "margins."
In 1977, Italy celebrated Corpus Christi as a public holiday. Since then the feast has been celebrated on the Apennine peninsula on the following Sunday. The Vatican, however, adhered to the traditional liturgical calendar, and on Thursday after the Holy Trinity, the liturgy is celebrated in the evening.
It was Pope John Paul II, who, in 1982, returned the Corpus Christi procession to its original form, namely to the center of Rome and to the episcopal church. He had already fought successfully in Crakow in the years before and had succeeded in enforcing it with the communist state authorities. The Holy Mass was celebrated in front of the Lateran Basilica, followed by the procession through the streets of Rome to the Basilica of Santa Maria Maggiore, where the Eucharistic blessing was given.
"Through our participation in the procession of the Most Holy Body and Blood of Christ, we would like to testify in front of the city and the whole world. This is our liturgy of praise and thanksgiving, which we must not neglect before God and man. I will bring thee a sacrifice of thanksgiving, and I will call the name of the Lord. I will fulfill my vow unto the Lord / open before all his people" (Psalm 116, 17-18).
With these words, John Paul II reintroduced the Corpus Christi procession.

Pope Worships as a deputy for the people of God

After John Paul II had abolished the Sedia gestatoria for his assuming office, there was no longer any support with the reintroduction of the procession. It was replaced by a converted truck. It did not change the original attitude of the pope, as it had been for centuries. During the whole procession, the Pope knelt before the Blessed Sacrament and held worship. Although already very sick and strongly limited in his motor skills, Pope John Paul II took part annually up to his life's end, at last only with great effort.


Corpus Christi procession with Benedict XVI

The Corpus Christi procession of 2004, his last one, remains unforgettable. John Paul II could not go any further. Therefore, a chair was attached to the platform of the vehicle, before which stood the traditional prie dieu and above all the Blessed Sacrament. When the procession began, John Paul II turned to the master of ceremonies and asked to help him kneel down, which he was no longer able to do alone. He tried to explain to him that he was trying too hard, and that it was safer to sit. After a short while he repeated his request: "I want to kneel down." He was again consoled. John Paul II became serious because he did not seem to understand him. With reference to the Most Holy, he said vigorously: "There is Jesus ... please!" One could no longer be indifferent to such an insistent request.  The two ceremoniares helped the Pope to kneel down on the prie dieu. But as his legs would not lift him up, he had to be lifted back to the chair.
"How great was the deepest desire of Saint John Paul II to kneel before the Most Blessed Sacrament before Jesus. What an intensity, what a belief "in the real presence of Jesus Christ," said Alessandro Ginotta for Papaboys 3.0 in 2012.

The Pope as a pilgrim among tens of thousands - The denial

As early as 2013, Pope Francis took a first, apparently small, revolutionary change. He took part in the procession on foot. The most Blessed Sacrament was still transported on the vehicle. There, however, the Pope knelt was not there kneeling before the Corpus Christi, but just two deacons. The pope went behind the vehicle like thousands of other participants.The revolutionary is in the body. The pope is not some participant, any believer. He prayed for the sake of the Holy Liturgy, instead of the people of God. From the Pope's Mass all the masses go out.


Corpus Christi Procession 2013, deacon at the Blessed Sacrament, Pope Francis walking behind it

In 2014, he briefly dismissed his participation in the Eucharistic procession because, according to the official statement, he was to visit Bishop Nunzio Galantino's diocese in Cassano dell'Jonio two days later, who he had appointed as a general secretary of the Italian Bishops' Conference a few months earlier. A visit to a small diocese, whose date was fixed by the Pope himself, was not seen by observers as a sufficient reason not to participate in a procession of so great importance as to bypass the real Presence of Christ, which to the gentiles and the heathen is folly and annoyance .
Francis left the Basilica of Santa Maria Maggiore in a car from the Lateran Basilica, where he celebrated the Holy Mass, it was where he awaited the arrival of the procession with the Blessed Sacrament.

In the car to Santa Maria Maggiore - transfer to Sunday

What was excused in 2014 with the visit to Calabria, which was held a few days later, has since become the standard. Also in 2015, after Holy Mass he was brought by car and the procession began to move. Pope Francis waited on the altar until the Most Blessed Sacrament had disappeared behind the house, left the square, and took a drive through other streets to Santa Maria Maggiore where he awaited the arrival of the procession and gave the Eucharistic blessing.


Corpus Christi procession since 2014 without Pope: Francis offers the final blessing in Santa Maria Maggiore

Pope Francis then undertook a second deep intervention. On March 28th, it was announced that he would transfer the Roman Corpus Christi procession from Thursday to Sunday. The "historical" intervention was justified by the fact that Francis wanted to follow the Italian liturgical calendar. The Italian Episcopal Conference had postponed the Feast to Sunday to facilitate the participation of the faithful after the Republic of Italy abolished Corpus Christi as a legal holiday in 1977. The Vatican, on the other hand, continued to hold it on to the original day, which still applies to the world Church. With his decision, Francis emphasized the pre-eminence of the Bishop of Rome to the Pope, who is responsible for the world Church.
The pope, however, had a second intention with the transfer, as it was unofficially called. In recent years, the number of participants in Holy Mass at the Lateran basilica has declined. The transfer to Sunday should allow for a greater participation not only at the procession, but also at the Mass.

The speculation

The reasons for the papal intervention were speculated.
As is well known, the Pope does not worship kneeling before the Most Blessed Sacrament during the Consecration. There are also rare moments in which he kneels before Jesus in the sacrament of the altar. As a rule he stands, as the recent lenten exercises for the Roman Curia showed. Finally, on the 25th of March, he even sat before the Holy Eucharist in the Cathedral of Milan. An official reason for this like knee weakness, or some health problems, was never mentioned.
In any case, with the knee problems explained by well-meaning sites that Francis took part in the procession on foot in 2013 and, like everyone else, walked along behind the Blessed Sacrament.
When, in 2014, he completely canceled his participation in the procession, he was excused by the same kind of fond feeling, that the long walk was too strenuous for him.
Now the procession, less liturgical, was moved by him to Sunday. It can not, however, be confirmed whether he will again take part in the procession, neither kneeling nor walking.
Text: Giuseppe Nardi
Photo: Vatican.va/MiL/Wikicommons/RAI (Screenshots)
Trans: Tancred vekron99@hotmail.com
Link to Katholisches...
AMDG

18 comments:

  1. Sounds like atrophy of Faith. No surprise there. He's saving his knees for the Holy Thursday Mandatum so he can scrub those mozlem feet clean.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Exactly! We will see what happens on Holy Thursday........maybe. Rumor has it that he will be going to a prison but 'privately'. I'm wondering if we will see anything of his infamous 'foot washing' that has been so scandalous for the past 4 years. He may be looking to cut down on the complaints from the faithful and not publicize anything that goes on in that prison.

      Delete
  2. I bet Pope Francis in his heart would love to bow down and get down on his knees in a mosque when he visits Egypt at the end of this month. Then we'd see pictures of our "pope" kneeling as some Muslim chants:
    "Allah u Akbar! Allah u Akbar! Ash-hadu an-lā ilāha illā allāh" etc.

    Damian Malliapalli

    ReplyDelete
  3. I don't think there is evidence that Corpus Christi processions have been happening in Rome since 1264. Circa 1320 is a much more likely date.

    But I agree withyour view about this pope's behaviour!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Are you Anglican?

      Delete
    2. Father Hunwicke is a very learned and faithful Catholic priest who came to Rome via the Anglican church (as did Cardinal Newman). In my view, one can benefit greatly by reading his erudite blog liturgicalnotes.blogspot.ca.

      Delete
  4. This so-called pope, named by many "pope Borgia" 2 days ago called Jesus Christ "devil and a snake" in his homily from Santa Marta. http://lasalettejourney.blogspot.ca/2017/04/the-dark-church-emerges-as-francis.html

    http://novusordowatch.org/2017/04/francis-christ-made-himself-devil/

    I believe, that he deeply in his heart does not believe in Christ or actually hate him. However, he always assure Muslims that we are praying to the same God. SHAME!!! He suppose to removed from the Chair of Peter and called a heretic and anti-pope.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Caveat lector! That's a sedevacantist website.

      Margaret

      Delete
    2. I just read the complete text in English of the Pope's homily in question, and I think you are wrong....this time. I think Socci is wrong too.
      I dislike Francis as much as any good, traditional and faithful Catholic, but in speaking of Jesus as "sin", he was just repeating what the old-time nuns used to teach kids in school to emphasise the sacrifice Jesus Christ made for us on Good Friday and the Crucifixion.
      If I'm not wrong, I think wat Francis meant is that Jesus didn't become the evil of sin itself (that indeed would be blasphemy), but rather he took all the sins of humanity upon his shoulders...all the sins that had ever been...and carried the weight of these sins upon his shoulders for our sake, to please God the Father. He took the sins from us, carried them himself, and asked the Father to cancel them out for our sake....by his sacrifice on Calvary.
      At least that;s what the old nuns....the good sisters (not what we have today...the aged lay clothes whinning femminists). Jesus became sin, took the weights of the world's sins upon his shoulders and offered them to the Father to cancel them out.
      I hope this is what Francis meant. It would be in keeping with what I even heard about the sacrifice of the Crucifixion. The act of Jesus suffering and dying under the burden of our sins .
      If NOT, if he really did say that Jesus is the devil, etc. as I have read from Socci and other blogs and sites, then Bergoglio is a heretic, and should be thrown out....and his associates too.
      Damian Malliapalli

      Delete
    3. The Pope really did say that Jesus "made himself the Devil:" compare the English, word for word, with the original Italian (straight from the Vatican website):

      “But what is the cross for us?” is the question posed by Francis. “Yes, it is the sign of Christians, it is the symbol of Christians, and we make the sign of the cross, but we do not always do it well, sometimes we do it so so … because we do not have this faith in the cross,” emphasized the Pope. The cross, then, he stated, “for some people is a badge of belonging: ‘Yes, I carry the cross to show that I am a Christian.’ ” And “It’s fine,” but “not just as a badge, as if it were a team, the badge of a team’; but [rather], said Francis, “as the memory of the man who made himself sin, who made himself the devil, the serpent, for us; he debased himself up to the point of totally annihilating himself.” [emphasis added] (from onepeterfive dot com com/pope-francis-christ-made-himself-the-devil/)

      Ma cosa è la croce per noi?» è la questione posta da Francesco. «Sì, è il segno dei cristiani, è il simbolo dei cristiani, e noi facciamo il segno della croce ma non sempre lo facciamo bene, alle volte lo facciamo così... perché non abbiamo questa fede alla croce» ha evidenziato il Papa. La croce, poi, ha affermato, «per alcune persone è un distintivo di appartenenza: “Sì, io porto la croce per far vedere che sono cristiano”». E «sta bene», però «non solo come distintivo, come se fosse una squadra, il distintivo di una squadra»; ma, ha detto Francesco, «come memoria di colui che si è fatto peccato, che si è fatto DIAVOLO, (my emphasis) serpente, per noi; si è abbassato fino ad annientarsi totalmente». (From http://m.vatican.va/content/francescomobile/it/cotidie/2017/documents/papa-francesco-cotidie_20170404_nel-segno-della-croce.html)

      "Diavolo" in Italian is "Devil" in English: http://dictionary.reverso.net/italian-english/diavolo

      Delete
    4. If this translation is correct, he is saying Jesus was the devil, was sin. Not that he took it on, but was. Blasphemy! This man does not deserve the benefit of the doubt any longer, and apologists need to seriously consider what they are defending.

      Delete
  5. How long will Christ allow himself to be mocked like this, and by his very own vicar?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Not one nanosecond longer than He allows.

      Have mercy on us, O Lord, have mercy on us! Since we have no defense, we sinners offer this supplication to You, our Master: Have mercy on us!

      Troparion of General Intercession and Penitence, Tone 6

      Margaret

      Delete
  6. For this year, they should place a cardboard cutout of Bergoglio next to the blessed sacrament in procession. The level of adoration coming from it would be no different had he been physically present.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Francis said this week to Catholic Youth preparing for yet another WYD in 2019 that he might not be there to see it, but 'THE POPE" would be there. The kids were shocked, but Bergoglio then said that he was at the age when " people pass away at any time", and that "no one guarantees life".
    I think he is both trying to tell the Church and the world something about himself that's coming soon (he can feel it....you can tell in his words)....and to prepare them for it.
    Many people can actually tlel when their time is up. I think Francis senses it.....or he would never say what he did.
    Damian Malliapalli

    ReplyDelete
  8. This is very well written and taught me a lot I did not know.
    Thank you.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Agree,I'm buying a book about the actual history of the Catholic Church.
      There is so much I don't know.
      The SSPV recommends reading about the history of the church so we can understand what we're living through now has happened before. (Albeit different circumstances for different stages in history)

      Delete