Wednesday, October 14, 2015

Pope's Intimate: "Feels Revulsion" for the Publication of the Letterof Complaint

(Rome) Bishop of Albano, Marcello Semeraro, secretary of the  C9-Cardinal Advisors, expressed his disquiet that the complaint letter was published by 13 Cardinals.  I sense a feeling of revulsion about the publishing of the letter," said the Bishop.  He then corrected himself and spoke for the entire synod. "That is the general opinion." 
Bishop Semeraro belongs to a circle of confidants around the Pope. His outburst is difficult to separate from his job in the Synod. He belongs to that group of whom the Cardinals had been directly critical. Semeraro is a member of the ten member editing committee of the  Relatio finalis, whom Pope  Franziskus named publicly on the 2nd of October.
The Cardinals had criticized in their letter  that the membership of the committees gave a "decisive majority" to the  partisans of the "new mercy", as  Vaticanista  Sandro Magister noted. Cardinal  Napier, one of the signatories of the letter said, "We preferred not to see the same kind of person there, who had already caused us pain previously.“ What was meant were the passages on remarried divorced and homosexuality in the middle report and in the final report of the Synod of 2014.
Semeraro's  provided  evidence that the  Cardinal's criticism was understood. The bishop chose offense as the best defense and was encouraged to downplay the significance of the critique.  By showing disapproval of form and procedure, he  distracted from the vital content. 

Semeraros condemnation, really: "I don't understand this letter"

To make the complaint letter public had  "not been  proper," and did not "serve a noble purpose,"  says Semeraro. It really looked like a, "disruptive action." The critic pointed his finger at the Vaticanista  Sandro Magister, without naming him, but he really meant the signer of the complaint letter, no less than  Gerhard Müller, the Prefect of the CDF.  Despite the apodoctic condemnation, the bishop clarified himself in the next sentence. "I don't understand this letter." 
The composition of the editing committee he explained that the Pope intended it not be "too Eurocentric."  As to the onsidedly progressive composition of the editing committee, Semeraro had nothing to say.  Initially he disregarded the charge of onesidedness, just reintroduced  yesterday by  South African Cardinal Napier. The question if it were "Eurocentric" or not, was not addressed in the critique. Yet the Archbishop of South Africa expressed the fear that the voice of Africa should not be misaligned with a progressive inclination.  

Question of the Remarried Divorced "Open"

As to the question of Communion for the remarried divorced  Bishop  Semeraro considers it "open," but "there is really still no  answer yet."  A onesided party of papal intimates, for which the signers of the complaint letter is not an open question, because the changing of doctrines "is impossible."   It is a new question and the life of the Church will not be handled on a theoretical basis.  In the direction of the critics, he said: "Above all it is to be avoided to portray those, who don't think as I do, heretics." 
Finally he said: "There has to be more time to deepen the questions. The Church discussed for several centuries of the mother of God was conceived without sin […]. Moreover, there are dogmas, like the Immaculate Conception which are not as important to the concrete lives of people, about which we are talking in the Synod. This should make us more reluctant and concerned, if we take a position."
Text: Giuseppe Nardi
Bild: Vatican Insider
Trans: Tancred vekron99@hotmail.com
AMDG

21 comments:

  1. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  2. May God multiply the voice of the 13 faithful bishops .
    This Pope is trying to subvert the teachings of our Faith. He is destroying hope.
    Pray he be rebuked. We need divine intervention against this deceiver.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

      Delete
    2. Right ye be, Patrick.

      What is wanting here is an understanding of justice. The homosexualists seem to understand reciprocity, not justice. god grant all these to understand what id is to be a man.

      Delete
    3. Ol' Barnum parodied himself, eh? Please forgive the misspellings of "God" and "is."

      To England, or Canada south of the 401 be you, Gaybriel.

      Delete
    4. May ye embrace Fr. Rosica in Windsor (and the both of ye repent!)

      Delete
    5. Of course the emotion got away with me, eh! Not that there's anything wrong with Fr. Rosica or homosexuality or cacophagy, or these other Greek terms and such, mind ye. The Law of Canada is the Law of the World.

      Delete
    6. Revulsion ??????
      Disquiet ??????
      You arrogate "the general opinion?"

      That is how homosexuals speak. The only people who listen are their commie, for the nonce, enablers.

      Delete
    7. The inevitable implosion of the Invert.

      Delete
    8. Hey, Gaybriel, speaking of implosions:

      https://veneremurcernui.wordpress.com/2015/10/14/the-papaloters-are-coming-out-of-the-woodwork-now/

      Delete
    9. Not to mention your soulmate, Fr Krzszstof.

      Delete
  3. "Moreover, there are dogmas, like the Immaculate Conception which are not as important to the concrete lives of people, about which we are talking in the Synod."

    I wonder what dogmas he's referring to. This is the first I've heard that the synod is discussing "dogmas." And plural yet.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Like the Immaculate Conception?

      Delete
    2. DJR, They (the devil and his useful idiots) are, ultimately, after the thrice defined Dogma of the Faith, Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus (Outside the Faith There is No Salvation). All other dogmas must fall first. The whole reason for Vatican II was that these Modernists must not be constrained by "dogmas". There is no 'wiggle-room' there, whereby they can play their bleeding heart cards for the poor, the disaffected, the marginalized, the deliberate unrepentant sinner, etc. Be aware, EENS is the prize the devil is after. Quotquot

      Delete
  4. What about some Catholic, nay, simply natural, revulsion for the wicked filth put out by the Synod. The whole thing has been a monumental scandal and a disaster for souls. The bishops ought to have denounced and walked out ages ago. It's shameful that the faithful should have to petition them to do so. See petition at The Remnant.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The sheer contempt for souls. Jesus, Mary and Holy St Joseph. Mercy, mercy. St Michael the Archangel shield and protect us.
      The enormity of it all!

      Delete
  5. 'To make the complaint letter public had "not been proper," and did not "serve a noble purpose," says Semeraro. It really looked like a, "disruptive action."'

    What a joke! Semeraro and his entourage of crooks and stooges blatantly and shamelessly destroy the Church and injure the faithful - and then have the unmitigated gall to bellyache about what is "proper" and "noble". Ha! They wouldn't recognise what is "proper" and "noble" if it fell on them from a great height.

    St Michael defend us in the hour of battle against these crooks and charlatans!

    ReplyDelete
  6. This Synod is the a Reign of Terror to Vatican II as the French Revolution.

    ReplyDelete
  7. "May God multiply the voice of the 13 faithful bishops .
    This Pope is trying to subvert the teachings of our Faith. He is destroying hope.
    Pray he be rebuked. We need divine intervention against this deceiver."

    We will get it too, sooner than Francis and his thugs thing. Francis will literally be gone in a heartbeat some day soon.....and his hopes, dreams, schemes and plans, as well as his supporters, will be quickly gone too.
    Don't be too surprised to turn on CNN one morning and hear the shocking news that Francis is gone.
    WEhat joy and applause there will be among the true Catholics, and the good true Bishops of the Synod. We will have to pray very hard for mercy for Francis soul!

    Damian Malliapalli

    ReplyDelete
  8. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete