(Rome) The Vatican expert Andrea Tornielli published two sentences by Pope Benedict XVI., which were allegedly from a reply to a correspondence. In it he declared that his resignation was "valid", it had been for no other reason than his age. "Speculation” about this is "absurd." He also confirmed the authenticity of statements attributed to him, that was written to the heretical theologian Hans Küng. Does the Church have two popes? Benedict XVI. signed himself as pope and used paper with the letterhead “Pope Emeritus". Francis describes himself as "Bishop of Rome" and signs only with "Franciscus". The traditional blog "Chiesa e post concilio” looks beyond the alleged letter of Benedict XVI. and sees a transparent maneuver by the ruling Church leadership, to cause widespread doubts and discomfort and to silence the faithful. Tornielli has not printed the alleged the “letter”. Above all, it does not come to him to deny or correct the place of the Holy See. Least of all with things of such magnitude. But above all Tornielli is not to be confused with the Acta Apostolica Sedis. In short, the message is reminiscent of another media hoax last summer, reported as a “great mystery" of an alleged visit to Benedict XVI. and the fact that he was supposed to have said, the Holy Spirit advised him to resign (see separate report Benedict's resignation: "God told me" - Media Hoax of the “Great Mystery"? ). Tornielli was merely instrumental in this action, probably even the misused tool of others, said "Chiesa e post concilio". We document the comment as a contribution to the current debate in the Church.
.
Tornielli quotes Some Sentences of Benedict XVI., Which Belong to "a Letter"
Chiesa e post concilio
The news has already made the rounds around the world. Tornielli published a "letter" of Benedict XVI., in which the "Pope Emeritus" explains and confirms his resignation's validity that there is no other reason than "advanced age." He is also to have confirmed Hans Küng (!) with the oft-quoted words about the "identity of perception" and his wish to want to be until the end of his days nothing more than a "worshiper".
I'm Sorry for Orwellian Despotism
I'm really sorry. Sorry to be treated by the so-called "Catholic journalists", but above all by the hierarchy as an imbecile (in the literal sense of the word). I'm tired of being mistreated, judged to be (with "Mercy") and sentenced and to be impeded in the utterance of doubt by arrogant and constant aggression. I am sorry for this kind of "Orwellian despotism," in which only "war galleys" are included, that "dominate". For the "nice words" about "service and humility," they just sound like hot air.
Some believers, it may be that they are a minority, are simply ignored or attacked mercilessly. To them it seems to be permitted, what the "Pope Emeritus" said of himself to the reactions when he offered the bishops of the SSPX an act of justice: total and unjustified hatred. The hatred manifests itself in very different forms: one of these is the indifference (the highest form of detestation) compared to the spiritual life and the soul of the faithful. Whether it is a believer or a lot, does not matter. Shameful is the sound, the disgust and aggression are treated with the those who "doubt". The allegations go far beyond a normal judgment and generalizations about the exalted letters from "the despot" . Each argument is minimized, delegitimized, no matter who it submits. Arbitrary labels are missed, sometimes vile, just as it suits.
To Refresh The Memory: The Works of Mercy
Obviously, this "humble servant" have forgotten that in the church not important WHO says something, but WHAT he says. In addition, they seem to have forgotten just what the spiritual works of fashionably acclaimed mercy are:
- Teach the ignorant
- Encourage the doubtful
- Comfort the afflicted
- Rebuke the sinner
- Bear wrongs patiently
- To those who insult us, sincerely forgive
- To pray for the living and the dead
So if justified criticism and legitimate doubts are expressed, then this must be clearly and unambiguously be clarified and resolved. When the believers are in the confusion, it is really to serve the duty of the holy shepherds their salvation, and to restore the right path. Chatter is not enough.
What do the articles of Tornielli change in current situation? Nothing. The "Pope Emeritus" wrote him two lines that we do not want to call into question, from which he creates a message. The problem does not dissolve with a simple denial. The "Pope Emeritus" should clarify the doubts with the facts. In this sense, I make a pressing appeal to him.
Why did not Benedict XVI Pass the Papal Dignity?
If his resignation is valid, then he would do it again without any form of error which are sufficient to make him canonically invalid, then he renounces the papacy and the papal symbols and insignia, then it was abandoning but especially on being Pope , then he has resigned really and completely. If he really is in "full compliance" with Francis, then he officially denies his teaching position in relation to Tradition, including the Motu Proprio Summorum Pontificum , which has already proven to have done so much good in the Church and which is now being so openly rejected.
It's time to stop with the dictation. This seems to be a realm of chaos, instead of the Church. The despotism of the "galleys", the "you do not know who I am" and "you must blindly obey" is over. The shepherds shall feed the sheep entrusted to them. They must do them justice.
Text: Giuseppe Nardi
image: Chiesa e post concilio
Trans: Tancred vekron99@hotmail.com
Link to katholisches...
AMGD
image: Chiesa e post concilio
Trans: Tancred vekron99@hotmail.com
Link to katholisches...
AMGD