Sunday, September 5, 2021

Stalin’s Jews

 Edit: ironically, providentially, many of them got what they had coming to them.

[ynetnews] Here's a particularly forlorn historical date: Almost 90 years ago, between the 19th and 20th of December 1917, in the midst of the Bolshevik revolution and civil war, Lenin signed a decree calling for the establishment of The All-Russian Extraordinary Commission for Combating Counter-Revolution and Sabotage, also known as Cheka. 

 

Within a short period of time, Cheka became the largest and cruelest state security organization. Its organizational structure was changed every few years, as were its names: From Cheka to GPU, later to NKVD, and later to KGB. 

 

We cannot know with certainty the number of deaths Cheka was responsible for in its various manifestations, but the number is surely at least 20 million, including victims of the forced collectivization, the hunger, large purges, expulsions, banishments, executions, and mass death at Gulags. 

 

Whole population strata were eliminated: Independent farmers, ethnic minorities, members of the bourgeoisie, senior officers, intellectuals, artists, labor movement activists, "opposition members" who were defined completely randomly, and countless members of the Communist party itself.

 

In his new, highly praised book "The War of the World, "Historian Niall Ferguson writes that no revolution in the history of mankind devoured its children with the same unrestrained appetite as did the Soviet revolution. In his book on the Stalinist purges, Tel Aviv University's Dr. Igal Halfin writes that Stalinist violence was unique in that it was directed internally. 

 

Lenin, Stalin, and their successors could not have carried out their deeds without wide-scale cooperation of disciplined "terror officials," cruel interrogators, snitches, executioners, guards, judges, perverts, and many bleeding hearts who were members of the progressive Western Left and were deceived by the Soviet regime of horror and even provided it with a kosher certificate. 

 

All these things are well-known to some extent or another, even though the former Soviet Union's archives have not yet been fully opened to the public. But who knows about this? Within Russia itself, very few people have been brought to justice for their crimes in the NKVD's and KGB's service. The Russian public discourse today completely ignores the question of "How could it have happened to us?" As opposed to Eastern European nations, the Russians did not settle the score with their Stalinist past.

 

And us, the Jews? An Israeli student finishes high school without ever hearing the name "Genrikh Yagoda," the greatest Jewish murderer of the 20th Century, the GPU's deputy commander and the founder and commander of the NKVD. Yagoda diligently implemented Stalin's collectivization orders and is responsible for the deaths of at least 10 million people. His Jewish deputies established and managed the Gulag system. After Stalin no longer viewed him favorably, Yagoda was demoted and executed, and was replaced as chief hangman in 1936 by Yezhov, the "bloodthirsty dwarf."

 

Yezhov was not Jewish but was blessed with an active Jewish wife. In his Book "Stalin: Court of the Red Star", Jewish historian Sebag Montefiore writes that during the darkest period of terror, when the Communist killing machine worked in full force, Stalin was surrounded by beautiful, young Jewish women.

 

Stalin's close associates and loyalists included member of the Central Committee and Politburo Lazar Kaganovich. Montefiore characterizes him as the "first Stalinist" and adds that those starving to death in Ukraine, an unparalleled tragedy in the history of human kind aside from the Nazi horrors and Mao's terror in China, did not move Kaganovich. 

 

Many Jews sold their soul to the devil of the Communist revolution and have blood on their hands for eternity. We'll mention just one more: Leonid Reichman, head of the NKVD's special department and the organization's chief interrogator, who was a particularly cruel sadist. 

 

In 1934, according to published statistics, 38.5 percent of those holding the most senior posts in the Soviet security apparatuses were of Jewish origin. They too, of course, were gradually eliminated in the next purges. In a fascinating lecture at a Tel Aviv University convention this week, Dr. Halfin described the waves of soviet terror as a "carnival of mass murder," "fantasy of purges", and "essianism of evil." Turns out that Jews too, when they become captivated by messianic ideology, can become great murderers, among the greatest known by modern history. 

 

The Jews active in official communist terror apparatuses (In the Soviet Union and abroad) and who at times led them, did not do this, obviously, as Jews, but rather, as Stalinists, communists, and "Soviet people." Therefore, we find it easy to ignore their origin and "play dumb": What do we have to do with them? But let's not forget them. My own view is different. I find it unacceptable that a person will be considered a member of the Jewish people when he does great things, but not considered part of our people when he does amazingly despicable things. 

 

Even if we deny it, we cannot escape the Jewishness of "our hangmen," who served the Red Terror with loyalty and dedication from its establishment. After all, others will always remind us of their origin.

 

https://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3342999,00.html


AMDG


26 comments:

  1. So, according to this, Hitler was correct about Je**sh influence over Stalin.
    I was always told that this was a myth.

    ReplyDelete
  2. There wouldn’t have been a Soviet Union without Jewish money coming from big bankers.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Are you still warming up to Stalin !

      Delete
    2. Are you still incapable of understanding irony?

      Delete
    3. No, I thought it was very low grade and in very bad taste.....whether you were being Ironic or not.

      Delete
  3. Amen to that, Tancred.

    Scratch the surface of big money, big power, big control over people and you will find a *ew.

    ReplyDelete
  4. That Jewish influence centered around Lazar Kaganovich: Jewish mass murderer of Slavs. Also among the inner circle encompassing Stalin was his concubine, Lazar's sister, Roza Kaganovich.

    https://www.jewishpress.com/sections/features/features-on-jewish-world/the-anti-semitism-of-khrushchev-and-kaganovich/2019/12/25/

    Kaganovich was the Jew behind the curtain of the Soviet murder machine dating back to the early 1920s. Between his split tenures as the Secretary of the Central Committee, he personally oversaw grain confiscations that led to the starvation of millioins of Ukrainian Kulaks. http://unitedarmedforcesofnovorossiya2014.blogspot.com/2016/07/the-wolf-of-kremlin-lazar-kaganovich-22.html

    Jewish myth-makers (a.k.a. historians) tell us that Kaganovich was removed from power by Khrushchev during "de-Stalinization."

    However, de-Stalinization itself was debunked by authentic defector Anatoly Golitsyn, as an official Soviet, strategic disinformation campaign. Khrushchev was no less brutal to Russians than Stalin. What is noteworthy is the fact that Jew Kaganovich was mysteriously "purge-proof," as he outlived not only Khrushchev and Stalin, but also Breshnev, Andropov, and Chernenko. Most interesting of all is that the year of Kaganovich's death coincided with the internally planned demolition of the USSR, 1991.

    ReplyDelete
  5. There is a theory that Stalin was from a "conversos" line of descent. There is also evidence that he intentionally infiltrated an Orthodox seminary in order to find out "how they ticked". The allegation is that he knew from an early age that he was going to "bring down Christianity" as a form of Jewish revenge.----The seminary that he attended is interesting because of a subsequent attendee who became a cardinal and participated in Vatican II. The individual had a name like Agagianian. In fact, he was actually a contender for pope in his day and time.---Once it was known that he attended the same seminary as Stalin, that ship "quickly sailed". He was of an Armenian background. Really wild story to be sure.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Stalin wasn't Jewish, by blood, culture, or religion. One of his grandsons, who kept the original family name, DNA was tested several years ago. His DNA results showed he was Georgian.But, even before the DNAwas tested, no competent history of Stalin ever claimed he was Jewish.

      Delete
    2. Stalin wasn't Jewish. Nobody in the Soviet hierarchy ever said he was Jewish, not even Trotsky, who would have trumpeted the fact if he was Jewish.

      Stalin always identified as Georgian. A few years ago, a FTDNA test was run on one of Stalin's grandsons who kept the original family name. His results showed he was Georgian, not Jewish.

      Delete

  6. WHAT ABOUT VATICAN COUNCIL II AND FATIMA ?

    When Jessica Gregori met St. Lucia and told Pope John Paul II about the Third Secret of Fatima the whole Church was already in apostasy interpreting Vatican Council II with a false premise to make Tradition obsolete.
    Archbishop Carlo Vigano has stated according to Life Site News (Sep 3, 2021) that Our Lady warned of a great apostasy in the Church.
    Our Lady spoke to the Gregori family, after their statue of Mary had started to shed tears of blood on February 2, 1995. She made clear that this apparition is linked to her apparitions in Fatima. She stated: “My children, the darkness of Satan is now obscuring the whole world and it is also obscuring the Church of God. Prepare to live what I had revealed to my little daughters of Fatima”…
    It is important to know that Jessica Gregori, the daughter of the family who witnessed these apparitions and supernatural events, was given by Our Lady the content of the third secret of Fatima and that this message was then passed on to Pope John Paul II at the time. She herself was able to meet, in 1996, with Sister Lucia of Fatima and to compare with her the messages they received concerning the third secret. They matched. 1
    The original interview of Archbishop Vigano was with a Portugese publication and was translated into English for the magazine Vatican Insider.2
    Vigano refers often to Vatican Council II in the original interview and draws from a book by Father Flavio Ubodi,the vice-president of the diocesan commission which approved the apparitions at Civitavecchia, Italy, and so the miraculous statue was placed in a church for veneration. Ubodi has recently published a book, in Italian, called Civitavecchia- 25 years with Mary.
    But Vigano has not said that the apostasy is already there in the Church from the pope to the parish priest and that he is also part of the problem.
    Peter Kwasniewski’s books and articles in general are written , for example, interpreting Vatican Council II and Magisterial documents deceptively with a false premise.In this way he does not have to affirm Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS).He is not ‘racist’ or ‘extremist’.So the Left allows him to speak at conferences and write his books with the error.
    They are free to write and speak re-intepreting Vatican Council II with the fake premise.It means Kwasniewski and Vigano are rejecting the Athanasius Creed which says all need faith and baptism of salvation. Imaginary cases are politcally projected as exceptions to EENS and the Syllabus of Errors too.So these traditionalists are not really interested in proclaiming the truths of the Faith.
    CONTINUED

    ReplyDelete

  7. WHAT ABOUT VATICAN COUNCIL II AND FATIMA ?

    When Jessica Gregori met St. Lucia and told Pope John Paul II about the Third Secret of Fatima the whole Church was already in apostasy interpreting Vatican Council II with a false premise to make Tradition obsolete.
    Archbishop Carlo Vigano has stated according to Life Site News (Sep 3, 2021) that Our Lady warned of a great apostasy in the Church.
    Our Lady spoke to the Gregori family, after their statue of Mary had started to shed tears of blood on February 2, 1995. She made clear that this apparition is linked to her apparitions in Fatima. She stated: “My children, the darkness of Satan is now obscuring the whole world and it is also obscuring the Church of God. Prepare to live what I had revealed to my little daughters of Fatima”…
    It is important to know that Jessica Gregori, the daughter of the family who witnessed these apparitions and supernatural events, was given by Our Lady the content of the third secret of Fatima and that this message was then passed on to Pope John Paul II at the time. She herself was able to meet, in 1996, with Sister Lucia of Fatima and to compare with her the messages they received concerning the third secret. They matched. 1
    The original interview of Archbishop Vigano was with a Portugese publication and was translated into English for the magazine Vatican Insider.2
    Vigano refers often to Vatican Council II in the original interview and draws from a book by Father Flavio Ubodi,the vice-president of the diocesan commission which approved the apparitions at Civitavecchia, Italy, and so the miraculous statue was placed in a church for veneration. Ubodi has recently published a book, in Italian, called Civitavecchia- 25 years with Mary.
    But Vigano has not said that the apostasy is already there in the Church from the pope to the parish priest and that he is also part of the problem.
    Peter Kwasniewski’s books and articles in general are written , for example, interpreting Vatican Council II and Magisterial documents deceptively with a false premise.In this way he does not have to affirm Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS).He is not ‘racist’ or ‘extremist’.So the Left allows him to speak at conferences and write his books with the error.
    They are free to write and speak re-intepreting Vatican Council II with the fake premise.It means Kwasniewski and Vigano are rejecting the Athanasius Creed which says all need faith and baptism of salvation. Imaginary cases are politcally projected as exceptions to EENS and the Syllabus of Errors too.So these traditionalists are not really interested in proclaiming the truths of the Faith.
    CONTINUED

    ReplyDelete
  8. CONTINUED

    Vigano criticizes the great apostasy but he knows that he must interpret Vatican Council II with the irrational premise, since it would be a break with the liberals and ecclesiastics – but also with his traditionalist friends.
    With the rational premise, there is no New Theology and when there is no New Theology,there is no New Ecumenism, New Evangelisation, New Ecclesiology etc. There is no new schism and heresy.
    I ask myself, how can the authenticity of apparitions like Medugorje be evaluated based upon faithfulness to Church doctrine, when the doctrines have been changed with an irrational premise and the popes are no more following the old Magisterium of the Catholic Church ?
    Eric Sammons has written a book titled Deadly Indifference on how the Church has lost its mission and how we can re-claim it.In the book Sammons could not affirm the absolutist interpretation of outside the Church there is no salvation. The false premise was used by him to create what he called the Salvation Spectrum. He was denying the Faith with his irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II and of course did connect his error with the title of the book.He was going along with the New Theology of the liberals that creates the Salvation Spectrum and religious indifferentism...So they appointed him Editor in Chief of Crisis Magazine.
    We see the apostasy when John Salza refuses to interpret Vatican Council II with the rational premise and so have to theologically affirm the absolutist interpretation of EENS.This would not help his career as a lawyer.So in an article on the blog 1Peter5 he calls on Catholics to not join sedevacantist communities.Instead he wants them to stay with his apostasy in the Church. Some choice.
    When Pope Benedict and Cardinal Bertone closed the Fatima apparitions,they did not tell the world that all the books on Vatican Council II, were written with a fake premise to produce a fake rupture with Tradition, which would contribute to the existing apostasy which Our Lady predicted at Fatima.
    Their interpretation of Vatican Council II and EENS was political and not honest.Their interpretation of the Third Secret could also be political and not honest.
    CONTINUED

    ReplyDelete
  9. CONTINUED

    THIRD SECRET OF FATIMA HIDDEN
    Pope Benedict kept the Third Secret of Fatima-apostasy- hidden since he was part of the apostasy with his irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II.It is political and not Magisterial.
    If the Third Secret of Fatima was about apostasy in the Church how could he say it .Since he was actively interpreting the Creeds, Catechisms, EENS, Vatican Council II and the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 with the false premise.He had approved the non traditional and schismatic premise, inference and conclusion of Church documents.
    Recently Bishop Athanasius Schneider told Dr. Taylor Marshall in an interview, that there are no literal cases of the baptism of desire. This would be explosive for Pope Benedict. Since Schneider is saying that we do not need the New Theology. LG 14( baptism of desire) is not an example of an objective exception to EENS.There could be an EENS with no known exceptions. The Council in LG 14 etc does not contradict the understanding of EENS, according to the missionaries of the 16th century.So he was also telling Cardinal Marx that he and Taylor Marshall, do not interpret the Council like Marx and the German Bishops and Pope Benedict.There is no theological basis today for the German Synodal Path, when the New Theology is put aside.
    With that statement Bishop Schneider is putting on hold the two popes interpretation of the Council and the spread of apostasy.-Lionel Andrades

    1
    https://www.lifesitenews.com/blogs/archbishop-vigano-our-lady-warned-of-great-apostasy-in-church-followed-by-risk-of-world-war-iii/
    2.
    https://insidethevatican.com/news/newsflash/letter-8-vigano-on-the-unrevealed-third-secret-of-fatima/


    ReplyDelete
  10. Never mind Stalin's Jews more relevant is How about Biden's Jews? his entire family and his cabinet and ambassadors?

    ReplyDelete
  11. Sounds like Revenge pogroms. Makes sense. Jews are largely atheist. But even Ultra Orthodox religious Jews have a satanic level of hatred for everyone, Jews included, outside their clique.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Elija, pray for the people you will convert

    ReplyDelete

  13. Corporations such as Arm and Hammer supported Stalin or it would have fallen in 1920s

    https://www.rbth.com/history/327129-armand-hammer-ties-with-the-ussr


    However, this went on for decades a Vet swore that in England he had seen a USA ship

    full of grain being loaded onto another ship (foreign) and than the grain pumped

    into another different ship that would carry it to USSR at the same port.

    ReplyDelete

  14. Stalin did not have a monopoly on hate

    https://gloria.tv/post/iDzDFskPhwuT3jAwi7idG9fwj

    ReplyDelete
  15. Jews killed by Nazis = 6 million*
    Ukrainians killed by Jews = 12 million*

    *all estimates are somewhat inflated

    ReplyDelete
  16. 1/2 million unarmed Catholic Polish civilians killed by "Catholic" Ukrainians(non OrthodoxChristians), 1942-45. (of course, estimates may be inflated)
    The Jews are just better at doing what they do. They may even have better genes, given their physical blood ties to their very own Jesus Christ. But evil intentions are found everywhere in our fallen nature. While considering the danger found in giving equal rights and democratic voice to those of all religions in public, it is worthwhile to keep in mind that the most basic "checks and balances" start inside ourselves, and not in any search for a "more perfect union".

    ReplyDelete
  17. @Phinnpoy: I am betting that there are a number of Jews in Georgia even if it is not Atlanta. What does Jewish DNA look like? Is it the same method that is used to differentiate between Protestant and Catholic Irish?

    ReplyDelete